summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/sched/act_api.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>2018-07-30 14:30:42 +0200
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2018-07-30 18:31:13 +0200
commit802bfb19152c0fb4137c6ba72bcf042ee023e743 (patch)
tree0330695824cf2ca9a5f5d270e4a161f7df857abf /net/sched/act_api.c
parentliquidio: remove redundant function cn23xx_dump_iq_regs (diff)
downloadlinux-802bfb19152c0fb4137c6ba72bcf042ee023e743.tar.xz
linux-802bfb19152c0fb4137c6ba72bcf042ee023e743.zip
net/sched: user-space can't set unknown tcfa_action values
Currently, when initializing an action, the user-space can specify and use arbitrary values for the tcfa_action field. If the value is unknown by the kernel, is implicitly threaded as TC_ACT_UNSPEC. This change explicitly checks for unknown values at action creation time, and explicitly convert them to TC_ACT_UNSPEC. No functional changes are introduced, but this will allow introducing tcfa_action values not exposed to user-space in a later patch. Note: we can't use the above to hide TC_ACT_REDIRECT from user-space, as the latter is already part of uAPI. v3 -> v4: - use an helper to check for action validity (JiriP) - emit an extack for invalid actions (JiriP) v4 -> v5: - keep messages on a single line, drop net_warn (Marcelo) Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/sched/act_api.c')
-rw-r--r--net/sched/act_api.c14
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/net/sched/act_api.c b/net/sched/act_api.c
index b43df1e25c6d..229d63c99be2 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_api.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_api.c
@@ -786,6 +786,15 @@ static struct tc_cookie *nla_memdup_cookie(struct nlattr **tb)
return c;
}
+static bool tcf_action_valid(int action)
+{
+ int opcode = TC_ACT_EXT_OPCODE(action);
+
+ if (!opcode)
+ return action <= TC_ACT_VALUE_MAX;
+ return opcode <= TC_ACT_EXT_OPCODE_MAX || action == TC_ACT_UNSPEC;
+}
+
struct tc_action *tcf_action_init_1(struct net *net, struct tcf_proto *tp,
struct nlattr *nla, struct nlattr *est,
char *name, int ovr, int bind,
@@ -895,6 +904,11 @@ struct tc_action *tcf_action_init_1(struct net *net, struct tcf_proto *tp,
}
}
+ if (!tcf_action_valid(a->tcfa_action)) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "invalid action value, using TC_ACT_UNSPEC instead");
+ a->tcfa_action = TC_ACT_UNSPEC;
+ }
+
return a;
err_mod: