sched: add new attr TCA_EXT_WARN_MSG to report tc extact message

We will report extack message if there is an error via netlink_ack(). But
if the rule is not to be exclusively executed by the hardware, extack is not
passed along and offloading failures don't get logged.

In commit 81c7288b170a ("sched: cls: enable verbose logging") Marcelo
made cls could log verbose info for offloading failures, which helps
improving Open vSwitch debuggability when using flower offloading.

It would also be helpful if userspace monitor tools, like "tc monitor",
could log this kind of message, as it doesn't require vswitchd log level
adjusment. Let's add a new tc attributes to report the extack message so
the monitor program could receive the failures. e.g.

  # tc monitor
  added chain dev enp3s0f1np1 parent ffff: chain 0
  added filter dev enp3s0f1np1 ingress protocol all pref 49152 flower chain 0 handle 0x1
    ct_state +trk+new
    not_in_hw
          action order 1: gact action drop
           random type none pass val 0
           index 1 ref 1 bind 1

  Warning: mlx5_core: matching on ct_state +new isn't supported.

In this patch I only report the extack message on add/del operations.
It doesn't look like we need to report the extack message on get/dump
operations.

Note this message not only reporte to multicast groups, it could also
be reported unicast, which may affect the current usersapce tool's behaivor.

Suggested-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230113034353.2766735-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 10 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/net/sched/act_api.c b/net/sched/act_api.c
index 5b3c0ac495be..cd09ef49df22 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_api.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_api.c
@@ -1582,7 +1582,7 @@ errout:
 
 static int tca_get_fill(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tc_action *actions[],
 			u32 portid, u32 seq, u16 flags, int event, int bind,
-			int ref)
+			int ref, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
 {
 	struct tcamsg *t;
 	struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
@@ -1606,7 +1606,12 @@ static int tca_get_fill(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tc_action *actions[],
 
 	nla_nest_end(skb, nest);
 
+	if (extack && extack->_msg &&
+	    nla_put_string(skb, TCA_EXT_WARN_MSG, extack->_msg))
+		goto out_nlmsg_trim;
+
 	nlh->nlmsg_len = skb_tail_pointer(skb) - b;
+
 	return skb->len;
 
 out_nlmsg_trim:
@@ -1625,7 +1630,7 @@ tcf_get_notify(struct net *net, u32 portid, struct nlmsghdr *n,
 	if (!skb)
 		return -ENOBUFS;
 	if (tca_get_fill(skb, actions, portid, n->nlmsg_seq, 0, event,
-			 0, 1) <= 0) {
+			 0, 1, NULL) <= 0) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Failed to fill netlink attributes while adding TC action");
 		kfree_skb(skb);
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -1799,7 +1804,7 @@ tcf_reoffload_del_notify(struct net *net, struct tc_action *action)
 	if (!skb)
 		return -ENOBUFS;
 
-	if (tca_get_fill(skb, actions, 0, 0, 0, RTM_DELACTION, 0, 1) <= 0) {
+	if (tca_get_fill(skb, actions, 0, 0, 0, RTM_DELACTION, 0, 1, NULL) <= 0) {
 		kfree_skb(skb);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -1886,7 +1891,7 @@ tcf_del_notify(struct net *net, struct nlmsghdr *n, struct tc_action *actions[],
 		return -ENOBUFS;
 
 	if (tca_get_fill(skb, actions, portid, n->nlmsg_seq, 0, RTM_DELACTION,
-			 0, 2) <= 0) {
+			 0, 2, extack) <= 0) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Failed to fill netlink TC action attributes");
 		kfree_skb(skb);
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -1965,7 +1970,7 @@ tcf_add_notify(struct net *net, struct nlmsghdr *n, struct tc_action *actions[],
 		return -ENOBUFS;
 
 	if (tca_get_fill(skb, actions, portid, n->nlmsg_seq, n->nlmsg_flags,
-			 RTM_NEWACTION, 0, 0) <= 0) {
+			 RTM_NEWACTION, 0, 0, extack) <= 0) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Failed to fill netlink attributes while adding TC action");
 		kfree_skb(skb);
 		return -EINVAL;