diff options
author | D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> | 2023-02-02 09:26:42 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2023-02-04 10:48:19 +0100 |
commit | aff7bfed9097435ea38de919befbe2d7771a3e87 (patch) | |
tree | c16906013868a13495e55a16f63946d7d4f5f4bc /net/smc/smc_llc.c | |
parent | net/smc: reduce unnecessary blocking in smcr_lgr_reg_rmbs() (diff) | |
download | linux-aff7bfed9097435ea38de919befbe2d7771a3e87.tar.xz linux-aff7bfed9097435ea38de919befbe2d7771a3e87.zip |
net/smc: replace mutex rmbs_lock and sndbufs_lock with rw_semaphore
It's clear that rmbs_lock and sndbufs_lock are aims to protect the
rmbs list or the sndbufs list.
During connection establieshment, smc_buf_get_slot() will always
be invoked, and it only performs read semantics in rmbs list and
sndbufs list.
Based on the above considerations, we replace mutex with rw_semaphore.
Only smc_buf_get_slot() use down_read() to allow smc_buf_get_slot()
run concurrently, other part use down_write() to keep exclusive
semantics.
Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/smc/smc_llc.c')
-rw-r--r-- | net/smc/smc_llc.c | 16 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_llc.c b/net/smc/smc_llc.c index c0e73e436e98..a0840b8c935b 100644 --- a/net/smc/smc_llc.c +++ b/net/smc/smc_llc.c @@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ static int smc_llc_fill_ext_v2(struct smc_llc_msg_add_link_v2_ext *ext, prim_lnk_idx = link->link_idx; lnk_idx = link_new->link_idx; - mutex_lock(&lgr->rmbs_lock); + down_write(&lgr->rmbs_lock); ext->num_rkeys = lgr->conns_num; if (!ext->num_rkeys) goto out; @@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ static int smc_llc_fill_ext_v2(struct smc_llc_msg_add_link_v2_ext *ext, } len += i * sizeof(ext->rt[0]); out: - mutex_unlock(&lgr->rmbs_lock); + up_write(&lgr->rmbs_lock); return len; } @@ -889,7 +889,7 @@ static int smc_llc_cli_rkey_exchange(struct smc_link *link, int rc = 0; int i; - mutex_lock(&lgr->rmbs_lock); + down_write(&lgr->rmbs_lock); num_rkeys_send = lgr->conns_num; buf_pos = smc_llc_get_first_rmb(lgr, &buf_lst); do { @@ -916,7 +916,7 @@ static int smc_llc_cli_rkey_exchange(struct smc_link *link, break; } while (num_rkeys_send || num_rkeys_recv); - mutex_unlock(&lgr->rmbs_lock); + up_write(&lgr->rmbs_lock); return rc; } @@ -999,14 +999,14 @@ static void smc_llc_save_add_link_rkeys(struct smc_link *link, ext = (struct smc_llc_msg_add_link_v2_ext *)((u8 *)lgr->wr_rx_buf_v2 + SMC_WR_TX_SIZE); max = min_t(u8, ext->num_rkeys, SMC_LLC_RKEYS_PER_MSG_V2); - mutex_lock(&lgr->rmbs_lock); + down_write(&lgr->rmbs_lock); for (i = 0; i < max; i++) { smc_rtoken_set(lgr, link->link_idx, link_new->link_idx, ext->rt[i].rmb_key, ext->rt[i].rmb_vaddr_new, ext->rt[i].rmb_key_new); } - mutex_unlock(&lgr->rmbs_lock); + up_write(&lgr->rmbs_lock); } static void smc_llc_save_add_link_info(struct smc_link *link, @@ -1313,7 +1313,7 @@ static int smc_llc_srv_rkey_exchange(struct smc_link *link, int rc = 0; int i; - mutex_lock(&lgr->rmbs_lock); + down_write(&lgr->rmbs_lock); num_rkeys_send = lgr->conns_num; buf_pos = smc_llc_get_first_rmb(lgr, &buf_lst); do { @@ -1338,7 +1338,7 @@ static int smc_llc_srv_rkey_exchange(struct smc_link *link, smc_llc_flow_qentry_del(&lgr->llc_flow_lcl); } while (num_rkeys_send || num_rkeys_recv); out: - mutex_unlock(&lgr->rmbs_lock); + up_write(&lgr->rmbs_lock); return rc; } |