summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/x25/x25_facilities.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorShaun Pereira <spereira@tusc.com.au>2005-06-23 07:16:17 +0200
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2005-06-23 07:16:17 +0200
commitebc3f64b864fc16a594c2e63bf55a55c7d42084b (patch)
tree95040f32ad5902051527b91966118e565d48865b /net/x25/x25_facilities.c
parent[X25]: Selective sub-address matching with call user data. (diff)
downloadlinux-ebc3f64b864fc16a594c2e63bf55a55c7d42084b.tar.xz
linux-ebc3f64b864fc16a594c2e63bf55a55c7d42084b.zip
[X25]: Fast select with no restriction on response
This patch is a follow up to patch 1 regarding "Selective Sub Address matching with call user data". It allows use of the Fast-Select-Acceptance optional user facility for X.25. This patch just implements fast select with no restriction on response (NRR). What this means (according to ITU-T Recomendation 10/96 section 6.16) is that if in an incoming call packet, the relevant facility bits are set for fast-select-NRR, then the called DTE can issue a direct response to the incoming packet using a call-accepted packet that contains call-user-data. This patch allows such a response. The called DTE can also respond with a clear-request packet that contains call-user-data. However, this feature is currently not implemented by the patch. How is Fast Select Acceptance used? By default, the system does not allow fast select acceptance (as before). To enable a response to fast select acceptance, After a listen socket in created and bound as follows socket(AF_X25, SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0); bind(call_soc, (struct sockaddr *)&locl_addr, sizeof(locl_addr)); but before a listen system call is made, the following ioctl should be used. ioctl(call_soc,SIOCX25CALLACCPTAPPRV); Now the listen system call can be made listen(call_soc, 4); After this, an incoming-call packet will be accepted, but no call-accepted packet will be sent back until the following system call is made on the socket that accepts the call ioctl(vc_soc,SIOCX25SENDCALLACCPT); The network (or cisco xot router used for testing here) will allow the application server's call-user-data in the call-accepted packet, provided the call-request was made with Fast-select NRR. Signed-off-by: Shaun Pereira <spereira@tusc.com.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/x25/x25_facilities.c')
-rw-r--r--net/x25/x25_facilities.c34
1 files changed, 29 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/net/x25/x25_facilities.c b/net/x25/x25_facilities.c
index a21bdb95f9a8..54278b962f4c 100644
--- a/net/x25/x25_facilities.c
+++ b/net/x25/x25_facilities.c
@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
* X.25 001 Split from x25_subr.c
* mar/20/00 Daniela Squassoni Disabling/enabling of facilities
* negotiation.
+ * apr/14/05 Shaun Pereira - Allow fast select with no restriction
+ * on response.
*/
#include <linux/kernel.h>
@@ -43,9 +45,31 @@ int x25_parse_facilities(struct sk_buff *skb,
case X25_FAC_CLASS_A:
switch (*p) {
case X25_FAC_REVERSE:
- facilities->reverse = p[1] & 0x01;
- *vc_fac_mask |= X25_MASK_REVERSE;
- break;
+ if((p[1] & 0x81) == 0x81) {
+ facilities->reverse = p[1] & 0x81;
+ *vc_fac_mask |= X25_MASK_REVERSE;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if((p[1] & 0x01) == 0x01) {
+ facilities->reverse = p[1] & 0x01;
+ *vc_fac_mask |= X25_MASK_REVERSE;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if((p[1] & 0x80) == 0x80) {
+ facilities->reverse = p[1] & 0x80;
+ *vc_fac_mask |= X25_MASK_REVERSE;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if(p[1] == 0x00) {
+ facilities->reverse
+ = X25_DEFAULT_REVERSE;
+ *vc_fac_mask |= X25_MASK_REVERSE;
+ break;
+ }
+
case X25_FAC_THROUGHPUT:
facilities->throughput = p[1];
*vc_fac_mask |= X25_MASK_THROUGHPUT;
@@ -122,7 +146,7 @@ int x25_create_facilities(unsigned char *buffer,
if (facilities->reverse && (facil_mask & X25_MASK_REVERSE)) {
*p++ = X25_FAC_REVERSE;
- *p++ = !!facilities->reverse;
+ *p++ = facilities->reverse;
}
if (facilities->throughput && (facil_mask & X25_MASK_THROUGHPUT)) {
@@ -171,7 +195,7 @@ int x25_negotiate_facilities(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk,
/*
* They want reverse charging, we won't accept it.
*/
- if (theirs.reverse && ours->reverse) {
+ if ((theirs.reverse & 0x01 ) && (ours->reverse & 0x01)) {
SOCK_DEBUG(sk, "X.25: rejecting reverse charging request");
return -1;
}