diff options
author | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2015-01-12 22:47:13 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2015-01-12 22:47:13 +0100 |
commit | d0d2cc53a058cc3768e3dc0d6e5e3fae0d944363 (patch) | |
tree | 21c9371b647f80c8d632f721b6b9e4f721240c98 /net/xfrm/xfrm_algo.c | |
parent | drivers: net: xen-netfront: remove residual dead code (diff) | |
parent | bridge: new function to pack vlans into ranges during gets (diff) | |
download | linux-d0d2cc53a058cc3768e3dc0d6e5e3fae0d944363.tar.xz linux-d0d2cc53a058cc3768e3dc0d6e5e3fae0d944363.zip |
Merge branch 'bridge_vlan_ranges'
Roopa Prabhu says:
====================
bridge: support for vlan range in setlink/dellink
This series adds new flags in IFLA_BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO to indicate
vlan range.
Will post corresponding iproute2 patches if these get accepted.
v1-> v2
- changed patches to use a nested list attribute
IFLA_BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_LIST as suggested by scott feldman
- dropped notification changes from the series. Will post them
separately after this range message is accepted.
v2 -> v3
- incorporated some review feedback
- include patches to fill vlan ranges during getlink
- Dropped IFLA_BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_LIST. I think it may get
confusing to userspace if we introduce yet another way to
send lists. With getlink already sending nested
IFLA_BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO in IFLA_AF_SPEC, It seems better to
use the existing format for lists and just use the flags from v2
to mark vlan ranges
====================
Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wilson Kok <wkok@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/xfrm/xfrm_algo.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions