diff options
author | Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> | 2008-01-12 03:02:18 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2008-01-12 03:02:18 +0100 |
commit | 2948d2ebbb98747b912ac6d0c864b4d02be8a6f5 (patch) | |
tree | 64e0eec6a3a2c91345d5eb7a00193e94782c2db9 /net | |
parent | [NETFILTER]: xt_helper: Do not bypass RCU (diff) | |
download | linux-2948d2ebbb98747b912ac6d0c864b4d02be8a6f5.tar.xz linux-2948d2ebbb98747b912ac6d0c864b4d02be8a6f5.zip |
[NETFILTER]: bridge: fix double POST_ROUTING invocation
The bridge code incorrectly causes two POST_ROUTING hook invocations
for DNATed packets that end up on the same bridge device. This
happens because packets with a changed destination address are passed
to dst_output() to make them go through the neighbour output function
again to build a new destination MAC address, before they will continue
through the IP hooks simulated by bridge netfilter.
The resulting hook order is:
PREROUTING (bridge netfilter)
POSTROUTING (dst_output -> ip_output)
FORWARD (bridge netfilter)
POSTROUTING (bridge netfilter)
The deferred hooks used to abort the first POST_ROUTING invocation,
but since the only thing bridge netfilter actually really wants is
a new MAC address, we can avoid going through the IP stack completely
by simply calling the neighbour output function directly.
Tested, reported and lots of data provided by: Damien Thebault <damien.thebault@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net')
-rw-r--r-- | net/bridge/br_netfilter.c | 18 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c b/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c index c1757c79dfbb..5d8b939eded1 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c @@ -247,8 +247,9 @@ static void __br_dnat_complain(void) * Let us first consider the case that ip_route_input() succeeds: * * If skb->dst->dev equals the logical bridge device the packet - * came in on, we can consider this bridging. We then call - * skb->dst->output() which will make the packet enter br_nf_local_out() + * came in on, we can consider this bridging. The packet is passed + * through the neighbour output function to build a new destination + * MAC address, which will make the packet enter br_nf_local_out() * not much later. In that function it is assured that the iptables * FORWARD chain is traversed for the packet. * @@ -285,12 +286,17 @@ static int br_nf_pre_routing_finish_bridge(struct sk_buff *skb) skb->nf_bridge->mask ^= BRNF_NF_BRIDGE_PREROUTING; skb->dev = bridge_parent(skb->dev); - if (!skb->dev) - kfree_skb(skb); - else { + if (skb->dev) { + struct dst_entry *dst = skb->dst; + nf_bridge_pull_encap_header(skb); - skb->dst->output(skb); + + if (dst->hh) + return neigh_hh_output(dst->hh, skb); + else if (dst->neighbour) + return dst->neighbour->output(skb); } + kfree_skb(skb); return 0; } |