diff options
| author | Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> | 2016-10-06 15:40:14 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> | 2016-10-17 17:25:23 +0200 |
| commit | 1b203c138c5a0d78aa34d1c4346ff6b32ac74869 (patch) | |
| tree | 99870d3fe1eb6268bfcd13afead032d55c2d727f /net | |
| parent | strparser: Propagate correct error code in strp_recv() (diff) | |
| download | linux-1b203c138c5a0d78aa34d1c4346ff6b32ac74869.tar.xz linux-1b203c138c5a0d78aa34d1c4346ff6b32ac74869.zip | |
netfilter: xt_hashlimit: Add missing ULL suffixes for 64-bit constants
On 32-bit (e.g. with m68k-linux-gnu-gcc-4.1):
net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c: In function ‘user2credits’:
net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c:476: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘long’ type
...
net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c:478: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘long’ type
...
net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c:480: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘long’ type
...
net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c: In function ‘rateinfo_recalc’:
net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c:513: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘long’ type
Fixes: 11d5f15723c9f39d ("netfilter: xt_hashlimit: Create revision 2 to support higher pps rates")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Acked-by: Vishwanath Pai <vpai@akamai.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c b/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c index 2fab0c65aa94..b89b688e9d01 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static void htable_put(struct xt_hashlimit_htable *hinfo) CREDITS_PER_JIFFY*HZ*60*60*24 < 2^32 ie. */ #define MAX_CPJ_v1 (0xFFFFFFFF / (HZ*60*60*24)) -#define MAX_CPJ (0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF / (HZ*60*60*24)) +#define MAX_CPJ (0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFULL / (HZ*60*60*24)) /* Repeated shift and or gives us all 1s, final shift and add 1 gives * us the power of 2 below the theoretical max, so GCC simply does a @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ static u64 user2credits(u64 user, int revision) return div64_u64(user * HZ * CREDITS_PER_JIFFY_v1, XT_HASHLIMIT_SCALE); } else { - if (user > 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF / (HZ*CREDITS_PER_JIFFY)) + if (user > 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFULL / (HZ*CREDITS_PER_JIFFY)) return div64_u64(user, XT_HASHLIMIT_SCALE_v2) * HZ * CREDITS_PER_JIFFY; |