summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/samples/bpf
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>2014-10-28 23:11:42 +0100
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2014-10-30 20:44:37 +0100
commit342ded409608f84fe929216efe0ca2d45e2656be (patch)
tree5af9807e4493d1a8d5cb46f53a87ede0d9b0bfa8 /samples/bpf
parentbpf: reduce verifier memory consumption (diff)
downloadlinux-342ded409608f84fe929216efe0ca2d45e2656be.tar.xz
linux-342ded409608f84fe929216efe0ca2d45e2656be.zip
samples: bpf: add a verifier test and summary line
- add a test specifically targeting verifier state pruning. It checks state propagation between registers, storing that state into stack and state pruning algorithm recognizing equivalent stack and register states. - add summary line to spot failures easier Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'samples/bpf')
-rw-r--r--samples/bpf/test_verifier.c46
1 files changed, 45 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/samples/bpf/test_verifier.c b/samples/bpf/test_verifier.c
index eb4bec0ad8af..63402742345e 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -602,6 +602,45 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = ACCEPT,
},
+ {
+ "jump test 5",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3, -8),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 2),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3, -8),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 2),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3, -8),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 2),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3, -8),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 2),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3, -8),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 2),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ },
};
static int probe_filter_length(struct bpf_insn *fp)
@@ -630,7 +669,7 @@ static int create_map(void)
static int test(void)
{
- int prog_fd, i;
+ int prog_fd, i, pass_cnt = 0, err_cnt = 0;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) {
struct bpf_insn *prog = tests[i].insns;
@@ -657,21 +696,25 @@ static int test(void)
printf("FAIL\nfailed to load prog '%s'\n",
strerror(errno));
printf("%s", bpf_log_buf);
+ err_cnt++;
goto fail;
}
} else {
if (prog_fd >= 0) {
printf("FAIL\nunexpected success to load\n");
printf("%s", bpf_log_buf);
+ err_cnt++;
goto fail;
}
if (strstr(bpf_log_buf, tests[i].errstr) == 0) {
printf("FAIL\nunexpected error message: %s",
bpf_log_buf);
+ err_cnt++;
goto fail;
}
}
+ pass_cnt++;
printf("OK\n");
fail:
if (map_fd >= 0)
@@ -679,6 +722,7 @@ fail:
close(prog_fd);
}
+ printf("Summary: %d PASSED, %d FAILED\n", pass_cnt, err_cnt);
return 0;
}