summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/samples
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2019-10-08 05:16:34 +0200
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2019-10-08 05:16:34 +0200
commit72ccd9200f218a7eb2933a93e69a79a1ac984d83 (patch)
treea20d775996eee47d44f32888ab7cece80a115885 /samples
parentsamples/bpf: Trivial - fix spelling mistake in usage (diff)
parentselftests/bpf: add test for BPF flow dissector in the root namespace (diff)
downloadlinux-72ccd9200f218a7eb2933a93e69a79a1ac984d83.tar.xz
linux-72ccd9200f218a7eb2933a93e69a79a1ac984d83.zip
Merge branch 'enforce-global-flow-dissector'
Stanislav Fomichev says: ==================== While having a per-net-ns flow dissector programs is convenient for testing, security-wise it's better to have only one vetted global flow dissector implementation. Let's have a convention that when BPF flow dissector is installed in the root namespace, child namespaces can't override it. The intended use-case is to attach global BPF flow dissector early from the init scripts/systemd. Attaching global dissector is prohibited if some non-root namespace already has flow dissector attached. Also, attaching to non-root namespace is prohibited when there is flow dissector attached to the root namespace. v3: * drop extra check and empty line (Andrii Nakryiko) v2: * EPERM -> EEXIST (Song Liu) * Make sure we don't have dissector attached to non-root namespaces when attaching the global one (Andrii Nakryiko) ==================== Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'samples')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions