summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/security/integrity/ima
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>2018-08-16 22:13:03 +0200
committerJason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>2018-08-16 22:21:29 +0200
commit0a3173a5f09bc58a3638ecfd0a80bdbae55e123c (patch)
treed6c0bc84863cca54dfbde3b7463e5d49c82af9f1 /security/integrity/ima
parentRevert "net/smc: Replace ib_query_gid with rdma_get_gid_attr" (diff)
parentMerge tag 'for-linus-4.19-ofs1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/... (diff)
downloadlinux-0a3173a5f09bc58a3638ecfd0a80bdbae55e123c.tar.xz
linux-0a3173a5f09bc58a3638ecfd0a80bdbae55e123c.zip
Merge branch 'linus/master' into rdma.git for-next
rdma.git merge resolution for the 4.19 merge window Conflicts: drivers/infiniband/core/rdma_core.c - Use the rdma code and revise with the new spelling for atomic_fetch_add_unless drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c - Replace max_sge with max_send_sge in new blk code drivers/nvme/target/rdma.c - Use the blk code and revise to use NULL for ib_post_recv when appropriate - Replace max_sge with max_recv_sge in new blk code net/rds/ib_send.c - Use the net code and revise to use NULL for ib_post_recv when appropriate Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'security/integrity/ima')
-rw-r--r--security/integrity/ima/Kconfig59
-rw-r--r--security/integrity/ima/ima.h7
-rw-r--r--security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c4
-rw-r--r--security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c4
-rw-r--r--security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c16
-rw-r--r--security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c84
-rw-r--r--security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c57
-rw-r--r--security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c4
8 files changed, 187 insertions, 48 deletions
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
index 6a8f67714c83..13b446328dda 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ config IMA
select TCG_TIS if TCG_TPM && X86
select TCG_CRB if TCG_TPM && ACPI
select TCG_IBMVTPM if TCG_TPM && PPC_PSERIES
+ select INTEGRITY_AUDIT if AUDIT
help
The Trusted Computing Group(TCG) runtime Integrity
Measurement Architecture(IMA) maintains a list of hash
@@ -156,6 +157,64 @@ config IMA_APPRAISE
<http://linux-ima.sourceforge.net>
If unsure, say N.
+config IMA_APPRAISE_BUILD_POLICY
+ bool "IMA build time configured policy rules"
+ depends on IMA_APPRAISE && INTEGRITY_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS
+ default n
+ help
+ This option defines an IMA appraisal policy at build time, which
+ is enforced at run time without having to specify a builtin
+ policy name on the boot command line. The build time appraisal
+ policy rules persist after loading a custom policy.
+
+ Depending on the rules configured, this policy may require kernel
+ modules, firmware, the kexec kernel image, and/or the IMA policy
+ to be signed. Unsigned files might prevent the system from
+ booting or applications from working properly.
+
+config IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_FIRMWARE_SIGS
+ bool "Appraise firmware signatures"
+ depends on IMA_APPRAISE_BUILD_POLICY
+ default n
+ help
+ This option defines a policy requiring all firmware to be signed,
+ including the regulatory.db. If both this option and
+ CFG80211_REQUIRE_SIGNED_REGDB are enabled, then both signature
+ verification methods are necessary.
+
+config IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_KEXEC_SIGS
+ bool "Appraise kexec kernel image signatures"
+ depends on IMA_APPRAISE_BUILD_POLICY
+ default n
+ help
+ Enabling this rule will require all kexec'ed kernel images to
+ be signed and verified by a public key on the trusted IMA
+ keyring.
+
+ Kernel image signatures can not be verified by the original
+ kexec_load syscall. Enabling this rule will prevent its
+ usage.
+
+config IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_MODULE_SIGS
+ bool "Appraise kernel modules signatures"
+ depends on IMA_APPRAISE_BUILD_POLICY
+ default n
+ help
+ Enabling this rule will require all kernel modules to be signed
+ and verified by a public key on the trusted IMA keyring.
+
+ Kernel module signatures can only be verified by IMA-appraisal,
+ via the finit_module syscall. Enabling this rule will prevent
+ the usage of the init_module syscall.
+
+config IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_POLICY_SIGS
+ bool "Appraise IMA policy signature"
+ depends on IMA_APPRAISE_BUILD_POLICY
+ default n
+ help
+ Enabling this rule will require the IMA policy to be signed and
+ and verified by a key on the trusted IMA keyring.
+
config IMA_APPRAISE_BOOTPARAM
bool "ima_appraise boot parameter"
depends on IMA_APPRAISE
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
index 354bb5716ce3..67db9d9454ca 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
@@ -53,9 +53,9 @@ enum tpm_pcrs { TPM_PCR0 = 0, TPM_PCR8 = 8 };
extern int ima_policy_flag;
/* set during initialization */
-extern int ima_used_chip;
extern int ima_hash_algo;
extern int ima_appraise;
+extern struct tpm_chip *ima_tpm_chip;
/* IMA event related data */
struct ima_event_data {
@@ -232,13 +232,14 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v);
#define IMA_APPRAISE_MODULES 0x08
#define IMA_APPRAISE_FIRMWARE 0x10
#define IMA_APPRAISE_POLICY 0x20
+#define IMA_APPRAISE_KEXEC 0x40
#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE
int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func,
struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename,
struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value,
- int xattr_len, int opened);
+ int xattr_len);
int ima_must_appraise(struct inode *inode, int mask, enum ima_hooks func);
void ima_update_xattr(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file);
enum integrity_status ima_get_cache_status(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
@@ -254,7 +255,7 @@ static inline int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func,
struct file *file,
const unsigned char *filename,
struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value,
- int xattr_len, int opened)
+ int xattr_len)
{
return INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
}
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
index 8bd7a0733e51..deec1804a00a 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func,
struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename,
struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value,
- int xattr_len, int opened)
+ int xattr_len)
{
static const char op[] = "appraise_data";
const char *cause = "unknown";
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func,
cause = iint->flags & IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED ?
"IMA-signature-required" : "missing-hash";
status = INTEGRITY_NOLABEL;
- if (opened & FILE_CREATED)
+ if (file->f_mode & FMODE_CREATED)
iint->flags |= IMA_NEW_FILE;
if ((iint->flags & IMA_NEW_FILE) &&
(!(iint->flags & IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED) ||
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c
index 4e085a17124f..7e7e7e7c250a 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c
@@ -631,10 +631,10 @@ int ima_calc_buffer_hash(const void *buf, loff_t len,
static void __init ima_pcrread(int idx, u8 *pcr)
{
- if (!ima_used_chip)
+ if (!ima_tpm_chip)
return;
- if (tpm_pcr_read(NULL, idx, pcr) != 0)
+ if (tpm_pcr_read(ima_tpm_chip, idx, pcr) != 0)
pr_err("Error Communicating to TPM chip\n");
}
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c
index 29b72cd2502e..faac9ecaa0ae 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
/* name for boot aggregate entry */
static const char *boot_aggregate_name = "boot_aggregate";
-int ima_used_chip;
+struct tpm_chip *ima_tpm_chip;
/* Add the boot aggregate to the IMA measurement list and extend
* the PCR register.
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static int __init ima_add_boot_aggregate(void)
iint->ima_hash->algo = HASH_ALGO_SHA1;
iint->ima_hash->length = SHA1_DIGEST_SIZE;
- if (ima_used_chip) {
+ if (ima_tpm_chip) {
result = ima_calc_boot_aggregate(&hash.hdr);
if (result < 0) {
audit_cause = "hashing_error";
@@ -106,17 +106,11 @@ void __init ima_load_x509(void)
int __init ima_init(void)
{
- u8 pcr_i[TPM_DIGEST_SIZE];
int rc;
- ima_used_chip = 0;
- rc = tpm_pcr_read(NULL, 0, pcr_i);
- if (rc == 0)
- ima_used_chip = 1;
-
- if (!ima_used_chip)
- pr_info("No TPM chip found, activating TPM-bypass! (rc=%d)\n",
- rc);
+ ima_tpm_chip = tpm_default_chip();
+ if (!ima_tpm_chip)
+ pr_info("No TPM chip found, activating TPM-bypass!\n");
rc = integrity_init_keyring(INTEGRITY_KEYRING_IMA);
if (rc)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index dca44cf7838e..2d31921fbda4 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ void ima_file_free(struct file *file)
static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred,
u32 secid, char *buf, loff_t size, int mask,
- enum ima_hooks func, int opened)
+ enum ima_hooks func)
{
struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
struct integrity_iint_cache *iint = NULL;
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred,
if (rc == 0 && (action & IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK)) {
inode_lock(inode);
rc = ima_appraise_measurement(func, iint, file, pathname,
- xattr_value, xattr_len, opened);
+ xattr_value, xattr_len);
inode_unlock(inode);
}
if (action & IMA_AUDIT)
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ int ima_file_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long prot)
if (file && (prot & PROT_EXEC)) {
security_task_getsecid(current, &secid);
return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), secid, NULL,
- 0, MAY_EXEC, MMAP_CHECK, 0);
+ 0, MAY_EXEC, MMAP_CHECK);
}
return 0;
@@ -364,13 +364,13 @@ int ima_bprm_check(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
security_task_getsecid(current, &secid);
ret = process_measurement(bprm->file, current_cred(), secid, NULL, 0,
- MAY_EXEC, BPRM_CHECK, 0);
+ MAY_EXEC, BPRM_CHECK);
if (ret)
return ret;
security_cred_getsecid(bprm->cred, &secid);
return process_measurement(bprm->file, bprm->cred, secid, NULL, 0,
- MAY_EXEC, CREDS_CHECK, 0);
+ MAY_EXEC, CREDS_CHECK);
}
/**
@@ -383,14 +383,14 @@ int ima_bprm_check(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
* On success return 0. On integrity appraisal error, assuming the file
* is in policy and IMA-appraisal is in enforcing mode, return -EACCES.
*/
-int ima_file_check(struct file *file, int mask, int opened)
+int ima_file_check(struct file *file, int mask)
{
u32 secid;
security_task_getsecid(current, &secid);
return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), secid, NULL, 0,
mask & (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_EXEC |
- MAY_APPEND), FILE_CHECK, opened);
+ MAY_APPEND), FILE_CHECK);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ima_file_check);
@@ -429,16 +429,14 @@ void ima_post_path_mknod(struct dentry *dentry)
*/
int ima_read_file(struct file *file, enum kernel_read_file_id read_id)
{
- bool sig_enforce = is_module_sig_enforced();
-
- if (!file && read_id == READING_MODULE) {
- if (!sig_enforce && (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_MODULES) &&
- (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE)) {
- pr_err("impossible to appraise a module without a file descriptor. sig_enforce kernel parameter might help\n");
- return -EACCES; /* INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN */
- }
- return 0; /* We rely on module signature checking */
- }
+ /*
+ * READING_FIRMWARE_PREALLOC_BUFFER
+ *
+ * Do devices using pre-allocated memory run the risk of the
+ * firmware being accessible to the device prior to the completion
+ * of IMA's signature verification any more than when using two
+ * buffers?
+ */
return 0;
}
@@ -472,14 +470,13 @@ int ima_post_read_file(struct file *file, void *buf, loff_t size,
if (!file && read_id == READING_FIRMWARE) {
if ((ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_FIRMWARE) &&
- (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE))
+ (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE)) {
+ pr_err("Prevent firmware loading_store.\n");
return -EACCES; /* INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN */
+ }
return 0;
}
- if (!file && read_id == READING_MODULE) /* MODULE_SIG_FORCE enabled */
- return 0;
-
/* permit signed certs */
if (!file && read_id == READING_X509_CERTIFICATE)
return 0;
@@ -493,7 +490,50 @@ int ima_post_read_file(struct file *file, void *buf, loff_t size,
func = read_idmap[read_id] ?: FILE_CHECK;
security_task_getsecid(current, &secid);
return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), secid, buf, size,
- MAY_READ, func, 0);
+ MAY_READ, func);
+}
+
+/**
+ * ima_load_data - appraise decision based on policy
+ * @id: kernel load data caller identifier
+ *
+ * Callers of this LSM hook can not measure, appraise, or audit the
+ * data provided by userspace. Enforce policy rules requring a file
+ * signature (eg. kexec'ed kernel image).
+ *
+ * For permission return 0, otherwise return -EACCES.
+ */
+int ima_load_data(enum kernel_load_data_id id)
+{
+ bool sig_enforce;
+
+ if ((ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE) != IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE)
+ return 0;
+
+ switch (id) {
+ case LOADING_KEXEC_IMAGE:
+ if (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_KEXEC) {
+ pr_err("impossible to appraise a kernel image without a file descriptor; try using kexec_file_load syscall.\n");
+ return -EACCES; /* INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN */
+ }
+ break;
+ case LOADING_FIRMWARE:
+ if (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_FIRMWARE) {
+ pr_err("Prevent firmware sysfs fallback loading.\n");
+ return -EACCES; /* INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN */
+ }
+ break;
+ case LOADING_MODULE:
+ sig_enforce = is_module_sig_enforced();
+
+ if (!sig_enforce && (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_MODULES)) {
+ pr_err("impossible to appraise a module without a file descriptor. sig_enforce kernel parameter might help\n");
+ return -EACCES; /* INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN */
+ }
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ return 0;
}
static int __init init_ima(void)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index cdcc9a7b4e24..8c9499867c91 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
int ima_policy_flag;
static int temp_ima_appraise;
+static int build_ima_appraise __ro_after_init;
#define MAX_LSM_RULES 6
enum lsm_rule_types { LSM_OBJ_USER, LSM_OBJ_ROLE, LSM_OBJ_TYPE,
@@ -162,6 +163,25 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry default_appraise_rules[] __ro_after_init = {
#endif
};
+static struct ima_rule_entry build_appraise_rules[] __ro_after_init = {
+#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_MODULE_SIGS
+ {.action = APPRAISE, .func = MODULE_CHECK,
+ .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED},
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_FIRMWARE_SIGS
+ {.action = APPRAISE, .func = FIRMWARE_CHECK,
+ .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED},
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_KEXEC_SIGS
+ {.action = APPRAISE, .func = KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK,
+ .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED},
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_POLICY_SIGS
+ {.action = APPRAISE, .func = POLICY_CHECK,
+ .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED},
+#endif
+};
+
static struct ima_rule_entry secure_boot_rules[] __ro_after_init = {
{.action = APPRAISE, .func = MODULE_CHECK,
.flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED},
@@ -435,7 +455,7 @@ void ima_update_policy_flag(void)
ima_policy_flag |= entry->action;
}
- ima_appraise |= temp_ima_appraise;
+ ima_appraise |= (build_ima_appraise | temp_ima_appraise);
if (!ima_appraise)
ima_policy_flag &= ~IMA_APPRAISE;
}
@@ -448,6 +468,8 @@ static int ima_appraise_flag(enum ima_hooks func)
return IMA_APPRAISE_FIRMWARE;
else if (func == POLICY_CHECK)
return IMA_APPRAISE_POLICY;
+ else if (func == KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK)
+ return IMA_APPRAISE_KEXEC;
return 0;
}
@@ -486,8 +508,8 @@ void __init ima_init_policy(void)
}
/*
- * Insert the appraise rules requiring file signatures, prior to
- * any other appraise rules.
+ * Insert the builtin "secure_boot" policy rules requiring file
+ * signatures, prior to any other appraise rules.
*/
for (i = 0; i < secure_boot_entries; i++) {
list_add_tail(&secure_boot_rules[i].list, &ima_default_rules);
@@ -495,6 +517,26 @@ void __init ima_init_policy(void)
ima_appraise_flag(secure_boot_rules[i].func);
}
+ /*
+ * Insert the build time appraise rules requiring file signatures
+ * for both the initial and custom policies, prior to other appraise
+ * rules.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(build_appraise_rules); i++) {
+ struct ima_rule_entry *entry;
+
+ if (!secure_boot_entries)
+ list_add_tail(&build_appraise_rules[i].list,
+ &ima_default_rules);
+
+ entry = kmemdup(&build_appraise_rules[i], sizeof(*entry),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (entry)
+ list_add_tail(&entry->list, &ima_policy_rules);
+ build_ima_appraise |=
+ ima_appraise_flag(build_appraise_rules[i].func);
+ }
+
for (i = 0; i < appraise_entries; i++) {
list_add_tail(&default_appraise_rules[i].list,
&ima_default_rules);
@@ -615,14 +657,16 @@ static int ima_lsm_rule_init(struct ima_rule_entry *entry,
static void ima_log_string_op(struct audit_buffer *ab, char *key, char *value,
bool (*rule_operator)(kuid_t, kuid_t))
{
+ if (!ab)
+ return;
+
if (rule_operator == &uid_gt)
audit_log_format(ab, "%s>", key);
else if (rule_operator == &uid_lt)
audit_log_format(ab, "%s<", key);
else
audit_log_format(ab, "%s=", key);
- audit_log_untrustedstring(ab, value);
- audit_log_format(ab, " ");
+ audit_log_format(ab, "%s ", value);
}
static void ima_log_string(struct audit_buffer *ab, char *key, char *value)
{
@@ -637,7 +681,8 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
bool uid_token;
int result = 0;
- ab = audit_log_start(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_INTEGRITY_RULE);
+ ab = integrity_audit_log_start(audit_context(), GFP_KERNEL,
+ AUDIT_INTEGRITY_POLICY_RULE);
entry->uid = INVALID_UID;
entry->fowner = INVALID_UID;
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c
index 418f35e38015..b186819bd5aa 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c
@@ -142,10 +142,10 @@ static int ima_pcr_extend(const u8 *hash, int pcr)
{
int result = 0;
- if (!ima_used_chip)
+ if (!ima_tpm_chip)
return result;
- result = tpm_pcr_extend(NULL, pcr, hash);
+ result = tpm_pcr_extend(ima_tpm_chip, pcr, hash);
if (result != 0)
pr_err("Error Communicating to TPM chip, result: %d\n", result);
return result;