diff options
| author | Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> | 2020-09-28 04:38:26 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> | 2020-11-24 00:36:21 +0100 |
| commit | 3df98d79215ace13d1e91ddfc5a67a0f5acbd83f (patch) | |
| tree | 3e0db692f0d85f9a73ec0e2dd4298bda62f57b8b /security/security.c | |
| parent | selinux: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang (diff) | |
| download | linux-3df98d79215ace13d1e91ddfc5a67a0f5acbd83f.tar.xz linux-3df98d79215ace13d1e91ddfc5a67a0f5acbd83f.zip | |
lsm,selinux: pass flowi_common instead of flowi to the LSM hooks
As pointed out by Herbert in a recent related patch, the LSM hooks do
not have the necessary address family information to use the flowi
struct safely. As none of the LSMs currently use any of the protocol
specific flowi information, replace the flowi pointers with pointers
to the address family independent flowi_common struct.
Reported-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Acked-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'security/security.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | security/security.c | 17 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c index a28045dc9e7f..c08e0eec8b9e 100644 --- a/security/security.c +++ b/security/security.c @@ -2207,15 +2207,16 @@ void security_sk_clone(const struct sock *sk, struct sock *newsk) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_sk_clone); -void security_sk_classify_flow(struct sock *sk, struct flowi *fl) +void security_sk_classify_flow(struct sock *sk, struct flowi_common *flic) { - call_void_hook(sk_getsecid, sk, &fl->flowi_secid); + call_void_hook(sk_getsecid, sk, &flic->flowic_secid); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_sk_classify_flow); -void security_req_classify_flow(const struct request_sock *req, struct flowi *fl) +void security_req_classify_flow(const struct request_sock *req, + struct flowi_common *flic) { - call_void_hook(req_classify_flow, req, fl); + call_void_hook(req_classify_flow, req, flic); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_req_classify_flow); @@ -2407,7 +2408,7 @@ int security_xfrm_policy_lookup(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx, u32 fl_secid, u8 dir) int security_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(struct xfrm_state *x, struct xfrm_policy *xp, - const struct flowi *fl) + const struct flowi_common *flic) { struct security_hook_list *hp; int rc = LSM_RET_DEFAULT(xfrm_state_pol_flow_match); @@ -2423,7 +2424,7 @@ int security_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(struct xfrm_state *x, */ hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.xfrm_state_pol_flow_match, list) { - rc = hp->hook.xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(x, xp, fl); + rc = hp->hook.xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(x, xp, flic); break; } return rc; @@ -2434,9 +2435,9 @@ int security_xfrm_decode_session(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 *secid) return call_int_hook(xfrm_decode_session, 0, skb, secid, 1); } -void security_skb_classify_flow(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl) +void security_skb_classify_flow(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi_common *flic) { - int rc = call_int_hook(xfrm_decode_session, 0, skb, &fl->flowi_secid, + int rc = call_int_hook(xfrm_decode_session, 0, skb, &flic->flowic_secid, 0); BUG_ON(rc); |