diff options
| author | Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> | 2019-05-10 19:12:33 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> | 2019-05-21 03:46:02 +0200 |
| commit | 05174c95b83f8aca0c47b87115abb7a6387aafa5 (patch) | |
| tree | aaade5942a3d2f9f4406355207da7db63ae1913e /security/selinux/hooks.c | |
| parent | proc: prevent changes to overridden credentials (diff) | |
| download | linux-05174c95b83f8aca0c47b87115abb7a6387aafa5.tar.xz linux-05174c95b83f8aca0c47b87115abb7a6387aafa5.zip | |
selinux: do not report error on connect(AF_UNSPEC)
calling connect(AF_UNSPEC) on an already connected TCP socket is an
established way to disconnect() such socket. After commit 68741a8adab9
("selinux: Fix ltp test connect-syscall failure") it no longer works
and, in the above scenario connect() fails with EAFNOSUPPORT.
Fix the above explicitly early checking for AF_UNSPEC family, and
returning success in that case.
Reported-by: Tom Deseyn <tdeseyn@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 68741a8adab9 ("selinux: Fix ltp test connect-syscall failure")
Suggested-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'security/selinux/hooks.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | security/selinux/hooks.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c index c61787b15f27..3ec702cf46ca 100644 --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c @@ -4637,6 +4637,14 @@ static int selinux_socket_connect_helper(struct socket *sock, err = sock_has_perm(sk, SOCKET__CONNECT); if (err) return err; + if (addrlen < offsetofend(struct sockaddr, sa_family)) + return -EINVAL; + + /* connect(AF_UNSPEC) has special handling, as it is a documented + * way to disconnect the socket + */ + if (address->sa_family == AF_UNSPEC) + return 0; /* * If a TCP, DCCP or SCTP socket, check name_connect permission @@ -4657,8 +4665,6 @@ static int selinux_socket_connect_helper(struct socket *sock, * need to check address->sa_family as it is possible to have * sk->sk_family = PF_INET6 with addr->sa_family = AF_INET. */ - if (addrlen < offsetofend(struct sockaddr, sa_family)) - return -EINVAL; switch (address->sa_family) { case AF_INET: addr4 = (struct sockaddr_in *)address; |