diff options
author | Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> | 2022-05-06 18:08:19 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> | 2022-05-23 13:27:51 +0200 |
commit | eba39ca4b155c54adf471a69e91799cc1727873f (patch) | |
tree | ee3063cc1acbe6bf317cda7d459cb1323e3514cb /security | |
parent | landlock: Change landlock_add_rule(2) argument check ordering (diff) | |
download | linux-eba39ca4b155c54adf471a69e91799cc1727873f.tar.xz linux-eba39ca4b155c54adf471a69e91799cc1727873f.zip |
landlock: Change landlock_restrict_self(2) check ordering
According to the Landlock goal to be a security feature available to
unprivileges processes, it makes more sense to first check for
no_new_privs before checking anything else (i.e. syscall arguments).
Merge inval_fd_enforce and unpriv_enforce_without_no_new_privs tests
into the new restrict_self_checks_ordering. This is similar to the
previous commit checking other syscalls.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220506160820.524344-10-mic@digikod.net
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'security')
-rw-r--r-- | security/landlock/syscalls.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/security/landlock/syscalls.c b/security/landlock/syscalls.c index a7396220c9d4..507d43827afe 100644 --- a/security/landlock/syscalls.c +++ b/security/landlock/syscalls.c @@ -405,10 +405,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(landlock_restrict_self, const int, ruleset_fd, const __u32, if (!landlock_initialized) return -EOPNOTSUPP; - /* No flag for now. */ - if (flags) - return -EINVAL; - /* * Similar checks as for seccomp(2), except that an -EPERM may be * returned. @@ -417,6 +413,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(landlock_restrict_self, const int, ruleset_fd, const __u32, !ns_capable_noaudit(current_user_ns(), CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) return -EPERM; + /* No flag for now. */ + if (flags) + return -EINVAL; + /* Gets and checks the ruleset. */ ruleset = get_ruleset_from_fd(ruleset_fd, FMODE_CAN_READ); if (IS_ERR(ruleset)) |