summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/security
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRoberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>2019-08-05 18:44:27 +0200
committerJarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>2019-08-13 18:59:23 +0200
commit2d6c25215ab26bb009de3575faab7b685f138e92 (patch)
treec741ea6dc1f2b7040be70696eb10e3717aabdd3d /security
parentLinux 5.3-rc4 (diff)
downloadlinux-2d6c25215ab26bb009de3575faab7b685f138e92.tar.xz
linux-2d6c25215ab26bb009de3575faab7b685f138e92.zip
KEYS: trusted: allow module init if TPM is inactive or deactivated
Commit c78719203fc6 ("KEYS: trusted: allow trusted.ko to initialize w/o a TPM") allows the trusted module to be loaded even if a TPM is not found, to avoid module dependency problems. However, trusted module initialization can still fail if the TPM is inactive or deactivated. tpm_get_random() returns an error. This patch removes the call to tpm_get_random() and instead extends the PCR specified by the user with zeros. The security of this alternative is equivalent to the previous one, as either option prevents with a PCR update unsealing and misuse of sealed data by a user space process. Even if a PCR is extended with zeros, instead of random data, it is still computationally infeasible to find a value as input for a new PCR extend operation, to obtain again the PCR value that would allow unsealing. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 240730437deb ("KEYS: trusted: explicitly use tpm_chip structure...") Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com> Suggested-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'security')
-rw-r--r--security/keys/trusted.c13
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/security/keys/trusted.c b/security/keys/trusted.c
index 9a94672e7adc..ade699131065 100644
--- a/security/keys/trusted.c
+++ b/security/keys/trusted.c
@@ -1228,24 +1228,11 @@ hashalg_fail:
static int __init init_digests(void)
{
- u8 digest[TPM_MAX_DIGEST_SIZE];
- int ret;
- int i;
-
- ret = tpm_get_random(chip, digest, TPM_MAX_DIGEST_SIZE);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
- if (ret < TPM_MAX_DIGEST_SIZE)
- return -EFAULT;
-
digests = kcalloc(chip->nr_allocated_banks, sizeof(*digests),
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!digests)
return -ENOMEM;
- for (i = 0; i < chip->nr_allocated_banks; i++)
- memcpy(digests[i].digest, digest, TPM_MAX_DIGEST_SIZE);
-
return 0;
}