diff options
author | Pardha Saradhi K <pardha.saradhi.kesapragada@intel.com> | 2017-05-15 16:14:29 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> | 2017-05-24 19:25:12 +0200 |
commit | 5cd1f5c32132101955d7f0e1955249a84f9b6fd9 (patch) | |
tree | 49661588fbe3b0e3b083b45bda00e654f21c6e5c /sound | |
parent | ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Move i915 registration to worker thread (diff) | |
download | linux-5cd1f5c32132101955d7f0e1955249a84f9b6fd9.tar.xz linux-5cd1f5c32132101955d7f0e1955249a84f9b6fd9.zip |
ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Fix IPC rx_list corruption
In SKL+ platforms, all IPC commands are serialised, i.e. the driver sends
a new IPC to DSP, only after receiving a reply from the firmware for the
current IPC.
Hence it seems apparent that there is only a single modifier of the IPC RX
List. However, during an IPC timeout case in a multithreaded environment,
there is a possibility of the list element being deleted two times if not
properly protected.
So, use spin lock save/restore to prevent rx_list corruption.
Signed-off-by: Pardha Saradhi K <pardha.saradhi.kesapragada@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Subhransu S. Prusty <subhransu.s.prusty@intel.com>
Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'sound')
-rw-r--r-- | sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-sst-ipc.c | 5 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-sst-ipc.c b/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-sst-ipc.c index 58c525096a7c..498b15345b1a 100644 --- a/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-sst-ipc.c +++ b/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-sst-ipc.c @@ -413,8 +413,11 @@ static void skl_ipc_process_reply(struct sst_generic_ipc *ipc, u32 reply = header.primary & IPC_GLB_REPLY_STATUS_MASK; u64 *ipc_header = (u64 *)(&header); struct skl_sst *skl = container_of(ipc, struct skl_sst, ipc); + unsigned long flags; + spin_lock_irqsave(&ipc->dsp->spinlock, flags); msg = skl_ipc_reply_get_msg(ipc, *ipc_header); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ipc->dsp->spinlock, flags); if (msg == NULL) { dev_dbg(ipc->dev, "ipc: rx list is empty\n"); return; @@ -456,8 +459,10 @@ static void skl_ipc_process_reply(struct sst_generic_ipc *ipc, } } + spin_lock_irqsave(&ipc->dsp->spinlock, flags); list_del(&msg->list); sst_ipc_tx_msg_reply_complete(ipc, msg); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ipc->dsp->spinlock, flags); } irqreturn_t skl_dsp_irq_thread_handler(int irq, void *context) |