diff options
| author | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> | 2018-01-06 00:02:00 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> | 2018-01-07 00:10:32 +0100 |
| commit | 2b36047e7889b7efee22c11e17f035f721855731 (patch) | |
| tree | 0d7ec4ba60ccb884e26837f97a0ff476e2a02e9e /tools | |
| parent | bpf: sockmap missing NULL psock check (diff) | |
| download | linux-2b36047e7889b7efee22c11e17f035f721855731.tar.xz linux-2b36047e7889b7efee22c11e17f035f721855731.zip | |
selftests/bpf: fix test_align
since commit 82abbf8d2fc4 the verifier rejects the bit-wise
arithmetic on pointers earlier.
The test 'dubious pointer arithmetic' now has less output to match on.
Adjust it.
Fixes: 82abbf8d2fc4 ("bpf: do not allow root to mangle valid pointers")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c | 22 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c index 8591c89c0828..471bbbdb94db 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c @@ -474,27 +474,7 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { .result = REJECT, .matches = { {4, "R5=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=0,imm=0)"}, - /* ptr & 0x40 == either 0 or 0x40 */ - {5, "R5=inv(id=0,umax_value=64,var_off=(0x0; 0x40))"}, - /* ptr << 2 == unknown, (4n) */ - {7, "R5=inv(id=0,smax_value=9223372036854775804,umax_value=18446744073709551612,var_off=(0x0; 0xfffffffffffffffc))"}, - /* (4n) + 14 == (4n+2). We blow our bounds, because - * the add could overflow. - */ - {8, "R5=inv(id=0,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffffffffffc))"}, - /* Checked s>=0 */ - {10, "R5=inv(id=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, - /* packet pointer + nonnegative (4n+2) */ - {12, "R6=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, - {14, "R4=pkt(id=1,off=4,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, - /* NET_IP_ALIGN + (4n+2) == (4n), alignment is fine. - * We checked the bounds, but it might have been able - * to overflow if the packet pointer started in the - * upper half of the address space. - * So we did not get a 'range' on R6, and the access - * attempt will fail. - */ - {16, "R6=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, + /* R5 bitwise operator &= on pointer prohibited */ } }, { |