diff options
author | Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> | 2017-06-14 00:52:13 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2017-06-14 20:56:25 +0200 |
commit | 31fd85816dbe3a714bcc3f67c17c3dd87011f79e (patch) | |
tree | d8c694e4997605254ea96a76c5d633f60ee091cf /tools | |
parent | macvlan: propagate the mac address change status for lowerdev (diff) | |
download | linux-31fd85816dbe3a714bcc3f67c17c3dd87011f79e.tar.xz linux-31fd85816dbe3a714bcc3f67c17c3dd87011f79e.zip |
bpf: permits narrower load from bpf program context fields
Currently, verifier will reject a program if it contains an
narrower load from the bpf context structure. For example,
__u8 h = __sk_buff->hash, or
__u16 p = __sk_buff->protocol
__u32 sample_period = bpf_perf_event_data->sample_period
which are narrower loads of 4-byte or 8-byte field.
This patch solves the issue by:
. Introduce a new parameter ctx_field_size to carry the
field size of narrower load from prog type
specific *__is_valid_access validator back to verifier.
. The non-zero ctx_field_size for a memory access indicates
(1). underlying prog type specific convert_ctx_accesses
supporting non-whole-field access
(2). the current insn is a narrower or whole field access.
. In verifier, for such loads where load memory size is
less than ctx_field_size, verifier transforms it
to a full field load followed by proper masking.
. Currently, __sk_buff and bpf_perf_event_data->sample_period
are supporting narrowing loads.
. Narrower stores are still not allowed as typical ctx stores
are just normal stores.
Because of this change, some tests in verifier will fail and
these tests are removed. As a bonus, rename some out of bound
__sk_buff->cb access to proper field name and remove two
redundant "skb cb oob" tests.
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools')
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 92 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 79 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 4ee4708b0d60..13341700930c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -1073,44 +1073,22 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = ACCEPT, }, { - "check cb access: byte, oob 1", + "__sk_buff->hash, offset 0, byte store not permitted", .insns = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, - offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + 4), + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, hash)), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", .result = REJECT, }, { - "check cb access: byte, oob 2", + "__sk_buff->tc_index, offset 3, byte store not permitted", .insns = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, - offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0]) - 1), - BPF_EXIT_INSN(), - }, - .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", - .result = REJECT, - }, - { - "check cb access: byte, oob 3", - .insns = { - BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), - BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, - offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + 4), - BPF_EXIT_INSN(), - }, - .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", - .result = REJECT, - }, - { - "check cb access: byte, oob 4", - .insns = { - BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), - BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, - offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0]) - 1), + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_index) + 3), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", @@ -1188,44 +1166,22 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = REJECT, }, { - "check cb access: half, oob 1", + "check __sk_buff->hash, offset 0, half store not permitted", .insns = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, - offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + 4), + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, hash)), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", .result = REJECT, }, { - "check cb access: half, oob 2", + "check __sk_buff->tc_index, offset 2, half store not permitted", .insns = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, - offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0]) - 2), - BPF_EXIT_INSN(), - }, - .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", - .result = REJECT, - }, - { - "check cb access: half, oob 3", - .insns = { - BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), - BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, - offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + 4), - BPF_EXIT_INSN(), - }, - .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", - .result = REJECT, - }, - { - "check cb access: half, oob 4", - .insns = { - BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), - BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, - offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0]) - 2), + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_index) + 2), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", @@ -1368,28 +1324,6 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { "check cb access: double, oob 2", .insns = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), - BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, - offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + 8), - BPF_EXIT_INSN(), - }, - .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", - .result = REJECT, - }, - { - "check cb access: double, oob 3", - .insns = { - BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), - BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, - offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0]) - 8), - BPF_EXIT_INSN(), - }, - .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", - .result = REJECT, - }, - { - "check cb access: double, oob 4", - .insns = { - BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4])), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), @@ -1398,22 +1332,22 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = REJECT, }, { - "check cb access: double, oob 5", + "check __sk_buff->ifindex dw store not permitted", .insns = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), - BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, - offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + 8), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, ifindex)), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", .result = REJECT, }, { - "check cb access: double, oob 6", + "check __sk_buff->ifindex dw load not permitted", .insns = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, - offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0]) - 8), + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, ifindex)), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", |