diff options
author | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2019-12-19 23:20:47 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2019-12-19 23:20:47 +0100 |
commit | 0fd260056ef84ede8f444c66a3820811691fe884 (patch) | |
tree | 0d0085f3791dc71f9aef31287c162a946229e01c /tools | |
parent | Merge branch 'stmmac-fixes' (diff) | |
parent | bpf: Add further test_verifier cases for record_func_key (diff) | |
download | linux-0fd260056ef84ede8f444c66a3820811691fe884.tar.xz linux-0fd260056ef84ede8f444c66a3820811691fe884.zip |
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf 2019-12-19
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net* tree.
We've added 10 non-merge commits during the last 8 day(s) which contain
a total of 21 files changed, 269 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Fix lack of synchronization between xsk wakeup and destroying resources
used by xsk wakeup, from Maxim Mikityanskiy.
2) Fix pruning with tail call patching, untrack programs in case of verifier
error and fix a cgroup local storage tracking bug, from Daniel Borkmann.
3) Fix clearing skb->tstamp in bpf_redirect() when going from ingress to
egress which otherwise cause issues e.g. on fq qdisc, from Lorenz Bauer.
4) Fix compile warning of unused proc_dointvec_minmax_bpf_restricted() when
only cBPF is present, from Alexander Lobakin.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools')
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 43 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c | 6 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/runtime_jit.c | 151 |
3 files changed, 176 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index d27fd929abb9..87eaa49609a0 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -408,10 +408,10 @@ static void update_map(int fd, int index) assert(!bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &index, &value, 0)); } -static int create_prog_dummy1(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type) +static int create_prog_dummy_simple(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type, int ret) { struct bpf_insn prog[] = { - BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, ret), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }; @@ -419,14 +419,15 @@ static int create_prog_dummy1(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type) ARRAY_SIZE(prog), "GPL", 0, NULL, 0); } -static int create_prog_dummy2(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type, int mfd, int idx) +static int create_prog_dummy_loop(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type, int mfd, + int idx, int ret) { struct bpf_insn prog[] = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, idx), BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_2, mfd), BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_tail_call), - BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 41), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, ret), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }; @@ -435,10 +436,9 @@ static int create_prog_dummy2(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type, int mfd, int idx) } static int create_prog_array(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type, uint32_t max_elem, - int p1key) + int p1key, int p2key, int p3key) { - int p2key = 1; - int mfd, p1fd, p2fd; + int mfd, p1fd, p2fd, p3fd; mfd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY, sizeof(int), sizeof(int), max_elem, 0); @@ -449,23 +449,24 @@ static int create_prog_array(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type, uint32_t max_elem, return -1; } - p1fd = create_prog_dummy1(prog_type); - p2fd = create_prog_dummy2(prog_type, mfd, p2key); - if (p1fd < 0 || p2fd < 0) - goto out; + p1fd = create_prog_dummy_simple(prog_type, 42); + p2fd = create_prog_dummy_loop(prog_type, mfd, p2key, 41); + p3fd = create_prog_dummy_simple(prog_type, 24); + if (p1fd < 0 || p2fd < 0 || p3fd < 0) + goto err; if (bpf_map_update_elem(mfd, &p1key, &p1fd, BPF_ANY) < 0) - goto out; + goto err; if (bpf_map_update_elem(mfd, &p2key, &p2fd, BPF_ANY) < 0) - goto out; + goto err; + if (bpf_map_update_elem(mfd, &p3key, &p3fd, BPF_ANY) < 0) { +err: + close(mfd); + mfd = -1; + } + close(p3fd); close(p2fd); close(p1fd); - return mfd; -out: - close(p2fd); - close(p1fd); - close(mfd); - return -1; } static int create_map_in_map(void) @@ -684,7 +685,7 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_prog_type prog_type, } if (*fixup_prog1) { - map_fds[4] = create_prog_array(prog_type, 4, 0); + map_fds[4] = create_prog_array(prog_type, 4, 0, 1, 2); do { prog[*fixup_prog1].imm = map_fds[4]; fixup_prog1++; @@ -692,7 +693,7 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_prog_type prog_type, } if (*fixup_prog2) { - map_fds[5] = create_prog_array(prog_type, 8, 7); + map_fds[5] = create_prog_array(prog_type, 8, 7, 1, 2); do { prog[*fixup_prog2].imm = map_fds[5]; fixup_prog2++; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c index ebcbf154c460..604b46151736 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c @@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 7), /* bpf_tail_call() */ - BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 3), BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_2, 0), BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_7), BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_tail_call), @@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1), BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_release), /* bpf_tail_call() */ - BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 3), BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_2, 0), BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_7), BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_tail_call), @@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ BPF_SK_LOOKUP(sk_lookup_tcp), /* bpf_tail_call() */ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0), - BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 3), BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_2, 0), BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_7), BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_tail_call), diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/runtime_jit.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/runtime_jit.c index a9a8f620e71c..94c399d1faca 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/runtime_jit.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/runtime_jit.c @@ -27,6 +27,19 @@ { "runtime/jit: tail_call within bounds, no prog", .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 3), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_tail_call), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_prog1 = { 1 }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 1, +}, +{ + "runtime/jit: tail_call within bounds, key 2", + .insns = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 2), BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_2, 0), BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_tail_call), @@ -35,9 +48,147 @@ }, .fixup_prog1 = { 1 }, .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 24, +}, +{ + "runtime/jit: tail_call within bounds, key 2 / key 2, first branch", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 13), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0])), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0])), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 13, 4), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 2), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 3), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 2), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_tail_call), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_prog1 = { 5, 9 }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 24, +}, +{ + "runtime/jit: tail_call within bounds, key 2 / key 2, second branch", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 14), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0])), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0])), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 13, 4), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 2), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 3), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 2), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_tail_call), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_prog1 = { 5, 9 }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 24, +}, +{ + "runtime/jit: tail_call within bounds, key 0 / key 2, first branch", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 13), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0])), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0])), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 13, 4), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 3), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 2), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_tail_call), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_prog1 = { 5, 9 }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 24, +}, +{ + "runtime/jit: tail_call within bounds, key 0 / key 2, second branch", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 14), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0])), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0])), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 13, 4), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 3), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 2), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_tail_call), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_prog1 = { 5, 9 }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 42, +}, +{ + "runtime/jit: tail_call within bounds, different maps, first branch", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 13), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0])), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0])), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 13, 4), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 3), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_tail_call), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_prog1 = { 5 }, + .fixup_prog2 = { 9 }, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .errstr_unpriv = "tail_call abusing map_ptr", + .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 1, }, { + "runtime/jit: tail_call within bounds, different maps, second branch", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 14), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0])), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0])), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 13, 4), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 3), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_tail_call), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_prog1 = { 5 }, + .fixup_prog2 = { 9 }, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .errstr_unpriv = "tail_call abusing map_ptr", + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 42, +}, +{ "runtime/jit: tail_call out of bounds", .insns = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 256), |