Merge branch 'libnvdimm-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nvdimm/nvdimm

Pull libnvdimm fixes from Dan Williams:
 "A fix and regression test case for nvdimm namespace label
  compatibility.

  Details:

   - An "nvdimm namespace label" is metadata on an nvdimm that
     provisions dimm capacity into a "namespace" that can host a block
     device / dax-filesytem, or a device-dax character device.

     A namespace is an object that other operating environment and
     platform firmware needs to comprehend for capabilities like booting
     from an nvdimm.

     The label metadata contains a checksum that Linux was not
     calculating correctly leading to other environments rejecting the
     Linux label.

   These have received a build success notification from the kbuild
   robot, and a positive test result from Nick who reported the problem"

* 'libnvdimm-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nvdimm/nvdimm:
  nfit, libnvdimm: fix interleave set cookie calculation
  tools/testing/nvdimm: make iset cookie predictable

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
index 45be8b55a663..798f17655433 100644
--- a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
+++ b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
@@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	memdev->range_index = 0+1;
 	memdev->region_index = 4+1;
 	memdev->region_size = SPA0_SIZE/2;
-	memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[0];
+	memdev->region_offset = 1;
 	memdev->address = 0;
 	memdev->interleave_index = 0;
 	memdev->interleave_ways = 2;
@@ -902,7 +902,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	memdev->range_index = 0+1;
 	memdev->region_index = 5+1;
 	memdev->region_size = SPA0_SIZE/2;
-	memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[0] + SPA0_SIZE/2;
+	memdev->region_offset = (1 << 8);
 	memdev->address = 0;
 	memdev->interleave_index = 0;
 	memdev->interleave_ways = 2;
@@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	memdev->range_index = 1+1;
 	memdev->region_index = 4+1;
 	memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4;
-	memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1];
+	memdev->region_offset = (1 << 16);
 	memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2;
 	memdev->interleave_index = 0;
 	memdev->interleave_ways = 4;
@@ -932,7 +932,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	memdev->range_index = 1+1;
 	memdev->region_index = 5+1;
 	memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4;
-	memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1] + SPA1_SIZE/4;
+	memdev->region_offset = (1 << 24);
 	memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2;
 	memdev->interleave_index = 0;
 	memdev->interleave_ways = 4;
@@ -947,7 +947,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	memdev->range_index = 1+1;
 	memdev->region_index = 6+1;
 	memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4;
-	memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1] + 2*SPA1_SIZE/4;
+	memdev->region_offset = (1ULL << 32);
 	memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2;
 	memdev->interleave_index = 0;
 	memdev->interleave_ways = 4;
@@ -962,7 +962,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	memdev->range_index = 1+1;
 	memdev->region_index = 7+1;
 	memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4;
-	memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1] + 3*SPA1_SIZE/4;
+	memdev->region_offset = (1ULL << 40);
 	memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2;
 	memdev->interleave_index = 0;
 	memdev->interleave_ways = 4;
@@ -1380,7 +1380,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 		memdev->range_index = 11+1;
 		memdev->region_index = 9+1;
 		memdev->region_size = SPA0_SIZE;
-		memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[2];
+		memdev->region_offset = (1ULL << 48);
 		memdev->address = 0;
 		memdev->interleave_index = 0;
 		memdev->interleave_ways = 1;