diff options
author | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2019-05-03 04:14:21 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2019-05-03 04:14:21 +0200 |
commit | ff24e4980a68d83090a02fda081741a410fe8eef (patch) | |
tree | 4d874dfcaf2bb8c3abc2446af9447a983402c0ae /tools | |
parent | net: ll_temac: Fix typo bug for 32-bit (diff) | |
parent | Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net (diff) | |
download | linux-ff24e4980a68d83090a02fda081741a410fe8eef.tar.xz linux-ff24e4980a68d83090a02fda081741a410fe8eef.zip |
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net
Three trivial overlapping conflicts.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools')
-rw-r--r-- | tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c | 3 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/lib/bpf/.gitignore | 1 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c | 25 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c | 22 | ||||
-rwxr-xr-x | tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_rule_tests.sh | 10 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 34 |
6 files changed, 84 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c index e951d45c0131..3ec82904ccec 100644 --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c @@ -1163,6 +1163,9 @@ static int do_create(int argc, char **argv) return -1; } NEXT_ARG(); + } else { + p_err("unknown arg %s", *argv); + return -1; } } diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/.gitignore b/tools/lib/bpf/.gitignore index 7d9e182a1f51..d9e9dec04605 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/.gitignore +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/.gitignore @@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ libbpf_version.h libbpf.pc FEATURE-DUMP.libbpf test_libbpf +libbpf.so.* diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c index fb11240b758b..9093a8f64dc6 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c @@ -375,6 +375,31 @@ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { + "calls: ptr null check in subprog", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 3), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_6, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr_unpriv = "function calls to other bpf functions are allowed for root only", + .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 }, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 0, +}, +{ "calls: two calls with args", .insns = { BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 1), diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c index e3fc22e672c2..d5c596fdc4b9 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c @@ -631,3 +631,25 @@ .errstr = "invalid access to packet", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, +{ + "direct packet access: test29 (reg > pkt_end in subprog)", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_6), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_3, 8), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 4), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_6, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2, 1), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, +}, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_rule_tests.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_rule_tests.sh index d4cfb6a7a086..4b7e107865bf 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_rule_tests.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_rule_tests.sh @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ log_test() nsuccess=$((nsuccess+1)) printf "\n TEST: %-50s [ OK ]\n" "${msg}" else + ret=1 nfail=$((nfail+1)) printf "\n TEST: %-50s [FAIL]\n" "${msg}" if [ "${PAUSE_ON_FAIL}" = "yes" ]; then @@ -147,8 +148,8 @@ fib_rule6_test() fib_check_iproute_support "ipproto" "ipproto" if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then - match="ipproto icmp" - fib_rule6_test_match_n_redirect "$match" "$match" "ipproto icmp match" + match="ipproto ipv6-icmp" + fib_rule6_test_match_n_redirect "$match" "$match" "ipproto ipv6-icmp match" fi } @@ -245,4 +246,9 @@ setup run_fibrule_tests cleanup +if [ "$TESTS" != "none" ]; then + printf "\nTests passed: %3d\n" ${nsuccess} + printf "Tests failed: %3d\n" ${nfail} +fi + exit $ret diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c index f69d2ee29742..5019cdae5d0b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c @@ -2166,11 +2166,14 @@ TEST(detect_seccomp_filter_flags) SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_LOG, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_SPEC_ALLOW, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER }; - unsigned int flag, all_flags; + unsigned int exclusive[] = { + SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC, + SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER }; + unsigned int flag, all_flags, exclusive_mask; int i; long ret; - /* Test detection of known-good filter flags */ + /* Test detection of individual known-good filter flags */ for (i = 0, all_flags = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(flags); i++) { int bits = 0; @@ -2197,16 +2200,29 @@ TEST(detect_seccomp_filter_flags) all_flags |= flag; } - /* Test detection of all known-good filter flags */ - ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, all_flags, NULL); - EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); - EXPECT_EQ(EFAULT, errno) { - TH_LOG("Failed to detect that all known-good filter flags (0x%X) are supported!", - all_flags); + /* + * Test detection of all known-good filter flags combined. But + * for the exclusive flags we need to mask them out and try them + * individually for the "all flags" testing. + */ + exclusive_mask = 0; + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(exclusive); i++) + exclusive_mask |= exclusive[i]; + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(exclusive); i++) { + flag = all_flags & ~exclusive_mask; + flag |= exclusive[i]; + + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flag, NULL); + EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); + EXPECT_EQ(EFAULT, errno) { + TH_LOG("Failed to detect that all known-good filter flags (0x%X) are supported!", + flag); + } } - /* Test detection of an unknown filter flag */ + /* Test detection of an unknown filter flags, without exclusives. */ flag = -1; + flag &= ~exclusive_mask; ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flag, NULL); EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno) { |