diff options
| author | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2018-01-12 03:27:54 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2018-01-12 04:13:42 +0100 |
| commit | 19d28fbd306e7ae7c1acf05c3e6968b56f0d196b (patch) | |
| tree | 0584a3a4639424733bad7714796f858aa7addee7 /tools | |
| parent | Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next (diff) | |
| parent | Merge tag 'ceph-for-4.15-rc8' of git://github.com/ceph/ceph-client (diff) | |
| download | linux-19d28fbd306e7ae7c1acf05c3e6968b56f0d196b.tar.xz linux-19d28fbd306e7ae7c1acf05c3e6968b56f0d196b.zip | |
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net
BPF alignment tests got a conflict because the registers
are output as Rn_w instead of just Rn in net-next, and
in net a fixup for a testcase prohibits logical operations
on pointers before using them.
Also, we should attempt to patch BPF call args if JIT always on is
enabled. Instead, if we fail to JIT the subprogs we should pass
an error back up and fail immediately.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c | 22 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c index fe916d29e166..e19b410125eb 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c @@ -474,27 +474,7 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { .result = REJECT, .matches = { {4, "R5_w=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=0,imm=0)"}, - /* ptr & 0x40 == either 0 or 0x40 */ - {5, "R5_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=64,var_off=(0x0; 0x40))"}, - /* ptr << 2 == unknown, (4n) */ - {7, "R5_w=inv(id=0,smax_value=9223372036854775804,umax_value=18446744073709551612,var_off=(0x0; 0xfffffffffffffffc))"}, - /* (4n) + 14 == (4n+2). We blow our bounds, because - * the add could overflow. - */ - {8, "R5=inv(id=0,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffffffffffc))"}, - /* Checked s>=0 */ - {10, "R5=inv(id=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, - /* packet pointer + nonnegative (4n+2) */ - {12, "R6_w=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, - {14, "R4=pkt(id=1,off=4,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, - /* NET_IP_ALIGN + (4n+2) == (4n), alignment is fine. - * We checked the bounds, but it might have been able - * to overflow if the packet pointer started in the - * upper half of the address space. - * So we did not get a 'range' on R6, and the access - * attempt will fail. - */ - {16, "R6=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, + /* R5 bitwise operator &= on pointer prohibited */ } }, { |