KVM: x86: selftests: test simultaneous uses of V_IRQ from L1 and L0

Test that if:

* L1 disables virtual interrupt masking, and INTR intercept.

* L1 setups a virtual interrupt to be injected to L2 and enters L2 with
  interrupts disabled, thus the virtual interrupt is pending.

* Now an external interrupt arrives in L1 and since
  L1 doesn't intercept it, it should be delivered to L2 when
  it enables interrupts.

  to do this L0 (abuses) V_IRQ to setup an
  interrupt window, and returns to L2.

* L2 enables interrupts.
  This should trigger the interrupt window,
  injection of the external interrupt and delivery
  of the virtual interrupt that can now be done.

* Test that now L2 gets those interrupts.

This is the test that demonstrates the issue that was
fixed in the previous patch.

Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210914154825.104886-3-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

3 files changed, 130 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
index 618bf9bc7f3f..b8dbabe24ac2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
 /x86_64/smm_test
 /x86_64/state_test
 /x86_64/svm_vmcall_test
+/x86_64/svm_int_ctl_test
 /x86_64/sync_regs_test
 /x86_64/tsc_msrs_test
 /x86_64/userspace_msr_exit_test
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
index 9ac325cfc94a..d1774f461393 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/smm_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/state_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_preemption_timer_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/svm_vmcall_test
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/svm_int_ctl_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/sync_regs_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/userspace_msr_exit_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_apic_access_test
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_int_ctl_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_int_ctl_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..df04f56ce859
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_int_ctl_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * svm_int_ctl_test
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2021, Red Hat, Inc.
+ *
+ * Nested SVM testing: test simultaneous use of V_IRQ from L1 and L0.
+ */
+
+#include "test_util.h"
+#include "kvm_util.h"
+#include "processor.h"
+#include "svm_util.h"
+#include "apic.h"
+
+#define VCPU_ID		0
+
+static struct kvm_vm *vm;
+
+bool vintr_irq_called;
+bool intr_irq_called;
+
+#define VINTR_IRQ_NUMBER 0x20
+#define INTR_IRQ_NUMBER 0x30
+
+static void vintr_irq_handler(struct ex_regs *regs)
+{
+	vintr_irq_called = true;
+}
+
+static void intr_irq_handler(struct ex_regs *regs)
+{
+	x2apic_write_reg(APIC_EOI, 0x00);
+	intr_irq_called = true;
+}
+
+static void l2_guest_code(struct svm_test_data *svm)
+{
+	/* This code raises interrupt INTR_IRQ_NUMBER in the L1's LAPIC,
+	 * and since L1 didn't enable virtual interrupt masking,
+	 * L2 should receive it and not L1.
+	 *
+	 * L2 also has virtual interrupt 'VINTR_IRQ_NUMBER' pending in V_IRQ
+	 * so it should also receive it after the following 'sti'.
+	 */
+	x2apic_write_reg(APIC_ICR,
+		APIC_DEST_SELF | APIC_INT_ASSERT | INTR_IRQ_NUMBER);
+
+	__asm__ __volatile__(
+		"sti\n"
+		"nop\n"
+	);
+
+	GUEST_ASSERT(vintr_irq_called);
+	GUEST_ASSERT(intr_irq_called);
+
+	__asm__ __volatile__(
+		"vmcall\n"
+	);
+}
+
+static void l1_guest_code(struct svm_test_data *svm)
+{
+	#define L2_GUEST_STACK_SIZE 64
+	unsigned long l2_guest_stack[L2_GUEST_STACK_SIZE];
+	struct vmcb *vmcb = svm->vmcb;
+
+	x2apic_enable();
+
+	/* Prepare for L2 execution. */
+	generic_svm_setup(svm, l2_guest_code,
+			  &l2_guest_stack[L2_GUEST_STACK_SIZE]);
+
+	/* No virtual interrupt masking */
+	vmcb->control.int_ctl &= ~V_INTR_MASKING_MASK;
+
+	/* No intercepts for real and virtual interrupts */
+	vmcb->control.intercept &= ~(1ULL << INTERCEPT_INTR | INTERCEPT_VINTR);
+
+	/* Make a virtual interrupt VINTR_IRQ_NUMBER pending */
+	vmcb->control.int_ctl |= V_IRQ_MASK | (0x1 << V_INTR_PRIO_SHIFT);
+	vmcb->control.int_vector = VINTR_IRQ_NUMBER;
+
+	run_guest(vmcb, svm->vmcb_gpa);
+	GUEST_ASSERT(vmcb->control.exit_code == SVM_EXIT_VMMCALL);
+	GUEST_DONE();
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+	vm_vaddr_t svm_gva;
+
+	nested_svm_check_supported();
+
+	vm = vm_create_default(VCPU_ID, 0, (void *) l1_guest_code);
+
+	vm_init_descriptor_tables(vm);
+	vcpu_init_descriptor_tables(vm, VCPU_ID);
+
+	vm_install_exception_handler(vm, VINTR_IRQ_NUMBER, vintr_irq_handler);
+	vm_install_exception_handler(vm, INTR_IRQ_NUMBER, intr_irq_handler);
+
+	vcpu_alloc_svm(vm, &svm_gva);
+	vcpu_args_set(vm, VCPU_ID, 1, svm_gva);
+
+	struct kvm_run *run = vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID);
+	struct ucall uc;
+
+	vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);
+	TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO,
+		    "Got exit_reason other than KVM_EXIT_IO: %u (%s)\n",
+		    run->exit_reason,
+		    exit_reason_str(run->exit_reason));
+
+	switch (get_ucall(vm, VCPU_ID, &uc)) {
+	case UCALL_ABORT:
+		TEST_FAIL("%s", (const char *)uc.args[0]);
+		break;
+		/* NOT REACHED */
+	case UCALL_DONE:
+		goto done;
+	default:
+		TEST_FAIL("Unknown ucall 0x%lx.", uc.cmd);
+	}
+done:
+	kvm_vm_free(vm);
+	return 0;
+}