diff options
| author | Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com> | 2019-07-18 13:39:06 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> | 2019-07-20 09:00:45 +0200 |
| commit | d73eb57b80b98ae147e4e6a7d9877c2ba175f972 (patch) | |
| tree | ccba1f1c06ddf700c7985bed379550541e31a80c /virt | |
| parent | KVM: selftests: Remove superfluous define from vmx.c (diff) | |
| download | linux-d73eb57b80b98ae147e4e6a7d9877c2ba175f972.tar.xz linux-d73eb57b80b98ae147e4e6a7d9877c2ba175f972.zip | |
KVM: Boost vCPUs that are delivering interrupts
Inspired by commit 9cac38dd5d (KVM/s390: Set preempted flag during
vcpu wakeup and interrupt delivery), we want to also boost not just
lock holders but also vCPUs that are delivering interrupts. Most
smp_call_function_many calls are synchronous, so the IPI target vCPUs
are also good yield candidates. This patch introduces vcpu->ready to
boost vCPUs during wakeup and interrupt delivery time; unlike s390 we do
not reuse vcpu->preempted so that voluntarily preempted vCPUs are taken
into account by kvm_vcpu_on_spin, but vmx_vcpu_pi_put is not affected
(VT-d PI handles voluntary preemption separately, in pi_pre_block).
Testing on 80 HT 2 socket Xeon Skylake server, with 80 vCPUs VM 80GB RAM:
ebizzy -M
vanilla boosting improved
1VM 21443 23520 9%
2VM 2800 8000 180%
3VM 1800 3100 72%
Testing on my Haswell desktop 8 HT, with 8 vCPUs VM 8GB RAM, two VMs,
one running ebizzy -M, the other running 'stress --cpu 2':
w/ boosting + w/o pv sched yield(vanilla)
vanilla boosting improved
1570 4000 155%
w/ boosting + w/ pv sched yield(vanilla)
vanilla boosting improved
1844 5157 179%
w/o boosting, perf top in VM:
72.33% [kernel] [k] smp_call_function_many
4.22% [kernel] [k] call_function_i
3.71% [kernel] [k] async_page_fault
w/ boosting, perf top in VM:
38.43% [kernel] [k] smp_call_function_many
6.31% [kernel] [k] async_page_fault
6.13% libc-2.23.so [.] __memcpy_avx_unaligned
4.88% [kernel] [k] call_function_interrupt
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'virt')
| -rw-r--r-- | virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 12 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c index b4ab59dd6846..887f3b0c2b60 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c @@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ int kvm_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm *kvm, unsigned id) kvm_vcpu_set_in_spin_loop(vcpu, false); kvm_vcpu_set_dy_eligible(vcpu, false); vcpu->preempted = false; + vcpu->ready = false; r = kvm_arch_vcpu_init(vcpu); if (r < 0) @@ -2387,6 +2388,7 @@ bool kvm_vcpu_wake_up(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) wqp = kvm_arch_vcpu_wq(vcpu); if (swq_has_sleeper(wqp)) { swake_up_one(wqp); + WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->ready, true); ++vcpu->stat.halt_wakeup; return true; } @@ -2500,7 +2502,7 @@ void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *me, bool yield_to_kernel_mode) continue; } else if (pass && i > last_boosted_vcpu) break; - if (!READ_ONCE(vcpu->preempted)) + if (!READ_ONCE(vcpu->ready)) continue; if (vcpu == me) continue; @@ -4203,8 +4205,8 @@ static void kvm_sched_in(struct preempt_notifier *pn, int cpu) { struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = preempt_notifier_to_vcpu(pn); - if (vcpu->preempted) - vcpu->preempted = false; + vcpu->preempted = false; + WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->ready, false); kvm_arch_sched_in(vcpu, cpu); @@ -4216,8 +4218,10 @@ static void kvm_sched_out(struct preempt_notifier *pn, { struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = preempt_notifier_to_vcpu(pn); - if (current->state == TASK_RUNNING) + if (current->state == TASK_RUNNING) { vcpu->preempted = true; + WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->ready, true); + } kvm_arch_vcpu_put(vcpu); } |