diff options
| author | Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> | 2024-03-20 01:15:41 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> | 2024-04-08 22:20:24 +0200 |
| commit | 5c9ca4ed890889a2b7c300c4f63f3baf3f63383f (patch) | |
| tree | a7a1b880d823624a478b3454c562cb13104d65fd /virt | |
| parent | KVM: Add helpers to consolidate gfn_to_pfn_cache's page split check (diff) | |
| download | linux-5c9ca4ed890889a2b7c300c4f63f3baf3f63383f.tar.xz linux-5c9ca4ed890889a2b7c300c4f63f3baf3f63383f.zip | |
KVM: Check validity of offset+length of gfn_to_pfn_cache prior to activation
When activating a gfn_to_pfn_cache, verify that the offset+length is sane
and usable before marking the cache active. Letting __kvm_gpc_refresh()
detect the problem results in a cache being marked active without setting
the GPA (or any other fields), which in turn results in KVM trying to
refresh a cache with INVALID_GPA.
Attempting to refresh a cache with INVALID_GPA isn't functionally
problematic, but it runs afoul of the sanity check that exactly one of
GPA or userspace HVA is valid, i.e. that a cache is either GPA-based or
HVA-based.
Reported-by: syzbot+106a4f72b0474e1d1b33@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0000000000005fa5cc0613f1cebd@google.com
Fixes: 721f5b0dda78 ("KVM: pfncache: allow a cache to be activated with a fixed (userspace) HVA")
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>
Reviewed-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240320001542.3203871-3-seanjc@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'virt')
| -rw-r--r-- | virt/kvm/pfncache.c | 16 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/virt/kvm/pfncache.c b/virt/kvm/pfncache.c index 8f2121b5f2a0..91b0e329006b 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/pfncache.c +++ b/virt/kvm/pfncache.c @@ -245,8 +245,7 @@ out_error: return -EFAULT; } -static int __kvm_gpc_refresh(struct gfn_to_pfn_cache *gpc, gpa_t gpa, unsigned long uhva, - unsigned long len) +static int __kvm_gpc_refresh(struct gfn_to_pfn_cache *gpc, gpa_t gpa, unsigned long uhva) { unsigned long page_offset; bool unmap_old = false; @@ -260,9 +259,6 @@ static int __kvm_gpc_refresh(struct gfn_to_pfn_cache *gpc, gpa_t gpa, unsigned l if (WARN_ON_ONCE(kvm_is_error_gpa(gpa) == kvm_is_error_hva(uhva))) return -EINVAL; - if (!kvm_gpc_is_valid_len(gpa, uhva, len)) - return -EINVAL; - lockdep_assert_held(&gpc->refresh_lock); write_lock_irq(&gpc->lock); @@ -365,6 +361,9 @@ int kvm_gpc_refresh(struct gfn_to_pfn_cache *gpc, unsigned long len) guard(mutex)(&gpc->refresh_lock); + if (!kvm_gpc_is_valid_len(gpc->gpa, gpc->uhva, len)) + return -EINVAL; + /* * If the GPA is valid then ignore the HVA, as a cache can be GPA-based * or HVA-based, not both. For GPA-based caches, the HVA will be @@ -372,7 +371,7 @@ int kvm_gpc_refresh(struct gfn_to_pfn_cache *gpc, unsigned long len) */ uhva = kvm_is_error_gpa(gpc->gpa) ? gpc->uhva : KVM_HVA_ERR_BAD; - return __kvm_gpc_refresh(gpc, gpc->gpa, uhva, len); + return __kvm_gpc_refresh(gpc, gpc->gpa, uhva); } void kvm_gpc_init(struct gfn_to_pfn_cache *gpc, struct kvm *kvm) @@ -392,6 +391,9 @@ static int __kvm_gpc_activate(struct gfn_to_pfn_cache *gpc, gpa_t gpa, unsigned { struct kvm *kvm = gpc->kvm; + if (!kvm_gpc_is_valid_len(gpa, uhva, len)) + return -EINVAL; + guard(mutex)(&gpc->refresh_lock); if (!gpc->active) { @@ -411,7 +413,7 @@ static int __kvm_gpc_activate(struct gfn_to_pfn_cache *gpc, gpa_t gpa, unsigned gpc->active = true; write_unlock_irq(&gpc->lock); } - return __kvm_gpc_refresh(gpc, gpa, uhva, len); + return __kvm_gpc_refresh(gpc, gpa, uhva); } int kvm_gpc_activate(struct gfn_to_pfn_cache *gpc, gpa_t gpa, unsigned long len) |