diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt | 19 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt b/Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt index db0cb228d64a..e0d042af386c 100644 --- a/Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt +++ b/Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ need to use volatile as well. If volatile is still necessary, there is almost certainly a bug in the code somewhere. In properly-written kernel code, volatile can only serve to slow things down. -Consider a typical block of kernel code: +Consider a typical block of kernel code:: spin_lock(&the_lock); do_something_on(&shared_data); @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ optimization, so, once again, volatile is unnecessary. Another situation where one might be tempted to use volatile is when the processor is busy-waiting on the value of a variable. The right -way to perform a busy wait is: +way to perform a busy wait is:: while (my_variable != what_i_want) cpu_relax(); @@ -103,17 +103,20 @@ they come with a justification which shows that the concurrency issues have been properly thought through. -NOTES ------ +References +========== [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/233481/ + [2] http://lwn.net/Articles/233482/ -CREDITS -------- +Credits +======= Original impetus and research by Randy Dunlap + Written by Jonathan Corbet + Improvements via comments from Satyam Sharma, Johannes Stezenbach, Jesper - Juhl, Heikki Orsila, H. Peter Anvin, Philipp Hahn, and Stefan - Richter. +Juhl, Heikki Orsila, H. Peter Anvin, Philipp Hahn, and Stefan +Richter. |