diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/security.h | 3 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/core.c | 7 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 8 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 13 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | net/bpf/test_run.c | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | security/security.c | 3 |
7 files changed, 27 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h index 8b77d08d4b47..6c9b10d82c80 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h @@ -201,8 +201,8 @@ static inline void bpf_cgroup_storage_unset(void) { int i; - for (i = 0; i < BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_NEST_MAX; i++) { - if (unlikely(this_cpu_read(bpf_cgroup_storage_info[i].task) != current)) + for (i = BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_NEST_MAX - 1; i >= 0; i--) { + if (likely(this_cpu_read(bpf_cgroup_storage_info[i].task) != current)) continue; this_cpu_write(bpf_cgroup_storage_info[i].task, NULL); diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h index 24eda04221e9..5b7288521300 100644 --- a/include/linux/security.h +++ b/include/linux/security.h @@ -120,10 +120,11 @@ enum lockdown_reason { LOCKDOWN_MMIOTRACE, LOCKDOWN_DEBUGFS, LOCKDOWN_XMON_WR, + LOCKDOWN_BPF_WRITE_USER, LOCKDOWN_INTEGRITY_MAX, LOCKDOWN_KCORE, LOCKDOWN_KPROBES, - LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ, + LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ_KERNEL, LOCKDOWN_PERF, LOCKDOWN_TRACEFS, LOCKDOWN_XMON_RW, diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c index b1a5fc04492b..0a28a8095d3e 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c @@ -1362,11 +1362,13 @@ u64 __weak bpf_probe_read_kernel(void *dst, u32 size, const void *unsafe_ptr) } /** - * __bpf_prog_run - run eBPF program on a given context + * ___bpf_prog_run - run eBPF program on a given context * @regs: is the array of MAX_BPF_EXT_REG eBPF pseudo-registers * @insn: is the array of eBPF instructions * * Decode and execute eBPF instructions. + * + * Return: whatever value is in %BPF_R0 at program exit */ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn) { @@ -1878,6 +1880,9 @@ static void bpf_prog_select_func(struct bpf_prog *fp) * * Try to JIT eBPF program, if JIT is not available, use interpreter. * The BPF program will be executed via BPF_PROG_RUN() macro. + * + * Return: the &fp argument along with &err set to 0 for success or + * a negative errno code on failure */ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_select_runtime(struct bpf_prog *fp, int *err) { diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c index 62cf00383910..7a97b2f4747d 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c @@ -397,8 +397,8 @@ BPF_CALL_2(bpf_get_local_storage, struct bpf_map *, map, u64, flags) void *ptr; int i; - for (i = 0; i < BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_NEST_MAX; i++) { - if (unlikely(this_cpu_read(bpf_cgroup_storage_info[i].task) != current)) + for (i = BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_NEST_MAX - 1; i >= 0; i--) { + if (likely(this_cpu_read(bpf_cgroup_storage_info[i].task) != current)) continue; storage = this_cpu_read(bpf_cgroup_storage_info[i].storage[stype]); @@ -1070,12 +1070,12 @@ bpf_base_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id) case BPF_FUNC_probe_read_user: return &bpf_probe_read_user_proto; case BPF_FUNC_probe_read_kernel: - return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ) < 0 ? + return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ_KERNEL) < 0 ? NULL : &bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto; case BPF_FUNC_probe_read_user_str: return &bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto; case BPF_FUNC_probe_read_kernel_str: - return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ) < 0 ? + return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ_KERNEL) < 0 ? NULL : &bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto; case BPF_FUNC_snprintf_btf: return &bpf_snprintf_btf_proto; diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c index b4916ef388ad..fdd14072fc3b 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c @@ -990,28 +990,29 @@ bpf_tracing_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog) return &bpf_get_numa_node_id_proto; case BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read: return &bpf_perf_event_read_proto; - case BPF_FUNC_probe_write_user: - return bpf_get_probe_write_proto(); case BPF_FUNC_current_task_under_cgroup: return &bpf_current_task_under_cgroup_proto; case BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32: return &bpf_get_prandom_u32_proto; + case BPF_FUNC_probe_write_user: + return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_WRITE_USER) < 0 ? + NULL : bpf_get_probe_write_proto(); case BPF_FUNC_probe_read_user: return &bpf_probe_read_user_proto; case BPF_FUNC_probe_read_kernel: - return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ) < 0 ? + return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ_KERNEL) < 0 ? NULL : &bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto; case BPF_FUNC_probe_read_user_str: return &bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto; case BPF_FUNC_probe_read_kernel_str: - return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ) < 0 ? + return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ_KERNEL) < 0 ? NULL : &bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto; #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE case BPF_FUNC_probe_read: - return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ) < 0 ? + return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ_KERNEL) < 0 ? NULL : &bpf_probe_read_compat_proto; case BPF_FUNC_probe_read_str: - return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ) < 0 ? + return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ_KERNEL) < 0 ? NULL : &bpf_probe_read_compat_str_proto; #endif #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c index 1cc75c811e24..caa16bf30fb5 100644 --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ #include <linux/vmalloc.h> #include <linux/etherdevice.h> #include <linux/filter.h> +#include <linux/rcupdate_trace.h> #include <linux/sched/signal.h> #include <net/bpf_sk_storage.h> #include <net/sock.h> @@ -951,7 +952,10 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_syscall(struct bpf_prog *prog, goto out; } } + + rcu_read_lock_trace(); retval = bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu(prog, ctx); + rcu_read_unlock_trace(); if (copy_to_user(&uattr->test.retval, &retval, sizeof(u32))) { err = -EFAULT; diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c index 09533cbb7221..9ffa9e9c5c55 100644 --- a/security/security.c +++ b/security/security.c @@ -58,10 +58,11 @@ const char *const lockdown_reasons[LOCKDOWN_CONFIDENTIALITY_MAX+1] = { [LOCKDOWN_MMIOTRACE] = "unsafe mmio", [LOCKDOWN_DEBUGFS] = "debugfs access", [LOCKDOWN_XMON_WR] = "xmon write access", + [LOCKDOWN_BPF_WRITE_USER] = "use of bpf to write user RAM", [LOCKDOWN_INTEGRITY_MAX] = "integrity", [LOCKDOWN_KCORE] = "/proc/kcore access", [LOCKDOWN_KPROBES] = "use of kprobes", - [LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ] = "use of bpf to read kernel RAM", + [LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ_KERNEL] = "use of bpf to read kernel RAM", [LOCKDOWN_PERF] = "unsafe use of perf", [LOCKDOWN_TRACEFS] = "use of tracefs", [LOCKDOWN_XMON_RW] = "xmon read and write access", |