diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 23 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 3fb50757e812..315798037d6c 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -1772,16 +1772,21 @@ static int __mark_chain_precision(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, bitmap_from_u64(mask, stack_mask); for_each_set_bit(i, mask, 64) { if (i >= func->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE) { - /* This can happen if backtracking - * is propagating stack precision where - * caller has larger stack frame - * than callee, but backtrack_insn() should - * have returned -ENOTSUPP. + /* the sequence of instructions: + * 2: (bf) r3 = r10 + * 3: (7b) *(u64 *)(r3 -8) = r0 + * 4: (79) r4 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8) + * doesn't contain jmps. It's backtracked + * as a single block. + * During backtracking insn 3 is not recognized as + * stack access, so at the end of backtracking + * stack slot fp-8 is still marked in stack_mask. + * However the parent state may not have accessed + * fp-8 and it's "unallocated" stack space. + * In such case fallback to conservative. */ - verbose(env, "BUG spi %d stack_size %d\n", - i, func->allocated_stack); - WARN_ONCE(1, "verifier backtracking bug"); - return -EFAULT; + mark_all_scalars_precise(env, st); + return 0; } if (func->stack[i].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) { |