summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h')
-rw-r--r--tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
index 305c62817dd3..80bc0242e8dc 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ extern void bpf_iter_num_destroy(struct bpf_iter_num *it) __weak __ksym;
* I.e., it looks almost like high-level for each loop in other languages,
* supports continue/break, and is verifiable by BPF verifier.
*
- * For iterating integers, the difference betwen bpf_for_each(num, i, N, M)
+ * For iterating integers, the difference between bpf_for_each(num, i, N, M)
* and bpf_for(i, N, M) is in that bpf_for() provides additional proof to
* verifier that i is in [N, M) range, and in bpf_for_each() case i is `int
* *`, not just `int`. So for integers bpf_for() is more convenient.