diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 630 |
1 files changed, 569 insertions, 61 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index f8eac4a544f4..33f7d38849b8 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ #define MAX_INSNS BPF_MAXINSNS #define MAX_FIXUPS 8 #define MAX_NR_MAPS 13 +#define MAX_TEST_RUNS 8 #define POINTER_VALUE 0xcafe4all #define TEST_DATA_LEN 64 @@ -76,7 +77,7 @@ struct bpf_test { int fixup_percpu_cgroup_storage[MAX_FIXUPS]; const char *errstr; const char *errstr_unpriv; - uint32_t retval, retval_unpriv; + uint32_t retval, retval_unpriv, insn_processed; enum { UNDEF, ACCEPT, @@ -86,6 +87,14 @@ struct bpf_test { uint8_t flags; __u8 data[TEST_DATA_LEN]; void (*fill_helper)(struct bpf_test *self); + uint8_t runs; + struct { + uint32_t retval, retval_unpriv; + union { + __u8 data[TEST_DATA_LEN]; + __u64 data64[TEST_DATA_LEN / 8]; + }; + } retvals[MAX_TEST_RUNS]; }; /* Note we want this to be 64 bit aligned so that the end of our array is @@ -721,8 +730,18 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_0, 5), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "unknown opcode c4", + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 0, + }, + { + "arsh32 on imm 2", + .insns = { + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, 0x1122334485667788), + BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_0, 7), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = -16069393, }, { "arsh32 on reg", @@ -732,8 +751,19 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "unknown opcode cc", + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 0, + }, + { + "arsh32 on reg 2", + .insns = { + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, 0xffff55667788), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 15), + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 43724, }, { "arsh64 on imm", @@ -980,15 +1010,45 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_1, -8), /* mess up with R1 pointer on stack */ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_10, -7, 0x23), - /* fill back into R0 should fail */ + /* fill back into R0 is fine for priv. + * R0 now becomes SCALAR_VALUE. + */ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_10, -8), + /* Load from R0 should fail. */ + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 8), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .errstr_unpriv = "attempt to corrupt spilled", - .errstr = "corrupted spill", + .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv", .result = REJECT, }, { + "check corrupted spill/fill, LSB", + .insns = { + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0xcafe), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_10, -8), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr_unpriv = "attempt to corrupt spilled", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = POINTER_VALUE, + }, + { + "check corrupted spill/fill, MSB", + .insns = { + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, -4, 0x12345678), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_10, -8), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr_unpriv = "attempt to corrupt spilled", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = POINTER_VALUE, + }, + { "invalid src register in STX", .insns = { BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_10, -1, -1), @@ -1792,10 +1852,20 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, }, { - "invalid 64B read of family in SK_MSG", + "valid access size in SK_MSG", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, size)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG, + }, + { + "invalid 64B read of size in SK_MSG", .insns = { BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, - offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, family)), + offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, size)), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", @@ -1806,10 +1876,10 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { "invalid read past end of SK_MSG", .insns = { BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, - offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_port) + 4), + offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, size) + 4), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "R0 !read_ok", + .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG, }, @@ -1823,6 +1893,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "direct packet read for SK_MSG", @@ -2026,29 +2097,27 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = ACCEPT, }, { - "check skb->hash byte load not permitted 1", + "check skb->hash byte load permitted 1", .insns = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, hash) + 1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", - .result = REJECT, + .result = ACCEPT, }, { - "check skb->hash byte load not permitted 2", + "check skb->hash byte load permitted 2", .insns = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, hash) + 2), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", - .result = REJECT, + .result = ACCEPT, }, { - "check skb->hash byte load not permitted 3", + "check skb->hash byte load permitted 3", .insns = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), #if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN @@ -2060,8 +2129,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { #endif BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", - .result = REJECT, + .result = ACCEPT, }, { "check cb access: byte, wrong type", @@ -2173,7 +2241,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = ACCEPT, }, { - "check skb->hash half load not permitted", + "check skb->hash half load permitted 2", .insns = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), #if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN @@ -2185,8 +2253,41 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { #endif BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .result = ACCEPT, + }, + { + "check skb->hash half load not permitted, unaligned 1", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), +#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, hash) + 1), +#else + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, hash) + 3), +#endif + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", + .result = REJECT, + }, + { + "check skb->hash half load not permitted, unaligned 3", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), +#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, hash) + 3), +#else + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, hash) + 1), +#endif + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", .result = REJECT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "check cb access: half, wrong type", @@ -2418,6 +2519,10 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_index)), BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[3])), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tstamp)), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tstamp)), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .errstr_unpriv = "", @@ -2904,6 +3009,19 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = ACCEPT, }, { + "alu32: mov u32 const", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_7, 0), + BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_7, 1), + BPF_MOV32_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 0, + }, + { "unpriv: partial copy of pointer", .insns = { BPF_MOV32_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10), @@ -3249,6 +3367,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = REJECT, .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "raw_stack: skb_load_bytes, spilled regs corruption 2", @@ -3279,6 +3398,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = REJECT, .errstr = "R3 invalid mem access 'inv'", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "raw_stack: skb_load_bytes, spilled regs + data", @@ -3778,6 +3898,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R2 invalid mem access 'inv'", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "direct packet access: test16 (arith on data_end)", @@ -3880,6 +4001,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = ACCEPT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "direct packet access: test21 (x += pkt_ptr, 2)", @@ -3905,6 +4027,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = ACCEPT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "direct packet access: test22 (x += pkt_ptr, 3)", @@ -3935,6 +4058,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = ACCEPT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "direct packet access: test23 (x += pkt_ptr, 4)", @@ -3961,6 +4085,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid access to packet, off=0 size=8, R5(id=1,off=0,r=0)", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "direct packet access: test24 (x += pkt_ptr, 5)", @@ -3986,6 +4111,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = ACCEPT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "direct packet access: test25 (marking on <, good access)", @@ -5117,6 +5243,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=64 off=-2 size=4", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "invalid cgroup storage access 5", @@ -5233,6 +5360,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=64 off=-2 size=4", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "invalid per-cpu cgroup storage access 5", @@ -5270,6 +5398,31 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB, }, { + "write tstamp from CGROUP_SKB", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tstamp)), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .errstr_unpriv = "invalid bpf_context access off=152 size=8", + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB, + }, + { + "read tstamp from CGROUP_SKB", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tstamp)), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB, + }, + { "multiple registers share map_lookup_elem result", .insns = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 10), @@ -7149,6 +7302,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "invalid mem access 'inv'", .result = REJECT, .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "map element value illegal alu op, 5", @@ -7171,6 +7325,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 }, .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", .result = REJECT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "map element value is preserved across register spilling", @@ -7664,6 +7819,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .retval = 0 /* csum_diff of 64-byte packet */, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "helper access to variable memory: size = 0 not allowed on NULL (!ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL)", @@ -9626,6 +9782,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' > pkt_end, bad access 1", @@ -9663,6 +9820,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_end > pkt_data', good access", @@ -9701,6 +9859,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_end > pkt_data', bad access 2", @@ -9719,6 +9878,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' < pkt_end, good access", @@ -9757,6 +9917,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' < pkt_end, bad access 2", @@ -9775,6 +9936,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_end < pkt_data', good access", @@ -9792,6 +9954,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_end < pkt_data', bad access 1", @@ -9829,6 +9992,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' >= pkt_end, good access", @@ -9865,6 +10029,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' >= pkt_end, bad access 2", @@ -9902,6 +10067,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_end >= pkt_data', bad access 1", @@ -9940,6 +10106,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' <= pkt_end, good access", @@ -9958,6 +10125,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' <= pkt_end, bad access 1", @@ -9996,6 +10164,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_end <= pkt_data', good access", @@ -10032,6 +10201,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_end <= pkt_data', bad access 2", @@ -10068,6 +10238,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' > pkt_data, bad access 1", @@ -10105,6 +10276,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data > pkt_meta', good access", @@ -10143,6 +10315,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data > pkt_meta', bad access 2", @@ -10161,6 +10334,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' < pkt_data, good access", @@ -10199,6 +10373,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' < pkt_data, bad access 2", @@ -10217,6 +10392,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data < pkt_meta', good access", @@ -10234,6 +10410,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data < pkt_meta', bad access 1", @@ -10271,6 +10448,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' >= pkt_data, good access", @@ -10307,6 +10485,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' >= pkt_data, bad access 2", @@ -10344,6 +10523,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data >= pkt_meta', bad access 1", @@ -10382,6 +10562,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' <= pkt_data, good access", @@ -10400,6 +10581,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' <= pkt_data, bad access 1", @@ -10438,6 +10620,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', good access", @@ -10474,6 +10657,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', bad access 2", @@ -10578,6 +10762,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "dereference of modified ctx ptr", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "check deducing bounds from const, 8", @@ -10591,6 +10776,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "dereference of modified ctx ptr", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "check deducing bounds from const, 9", @@ -11065,6 +11251,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = REJECT, .errstr = "R6 invalid mem access 'inv'", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "calls: two calls with args", @@ -11930,6 +12117,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 12, 22 }, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=8 off=2 size=8", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "calls: two calls that receive map_value via arg=ptr_stack_of_caller. test2", @@ -12073,6 +12261,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 12, 22 }, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=8 off=2 size=8", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "calls: two calls that receive map_value_ptr_or_null via arg. test1", @@ -12244,6 +12433,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .retval = POINTER_VALUE, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 2", @@ -12275,6 +12465,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .errstr = "invalid access to packet", .result = REJECT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 3", @@ -12310,6 +12501,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 1, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 4", @@ -12344,6 +12536,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 1, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 5", @@ -12377,6 +12570,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .errstr = "same insn cannot be used with different", .result = REJECT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 6", @@ -12412,6 +12606,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .errstr = "R4 invalid mem access", .result = REJECT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 7", @@ -12446,6 +12641,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .errstr = "R4 invalid mem access", .result = REJECT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 8", @@ -12486,6 +12682,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = ACCEPT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 9", @@ -12527,6 +12724,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .errstr = "invalid access to packet", .result = REJECT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "calls: caller stack init to zero or map_value_or_null", @@ -12892,6 +13090,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = REJECT, .errstr = "BPF_XADD stores into R2 pkt is not allowed", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "xadd/w check whether src/dst got mangled, 1", @@ -13378,6 +13577,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .errstr = "Unreleased reference", .result = REJECT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "reference tracking: alloc, check, free in both subbranches", @@ -13406,6 +13606,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = ACCEPT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "reference tracking in call: free reference in subprog", @@ -13496,6 +13697,28 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = ACCEPT, }, { + "allocated_stack", + .insns = { + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 5), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_6, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_10, -8), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_7, -9), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_10, -9), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .result_unpriv = ACCEPT, + .insn_processed = 15, + }, + { "reference tracking in call: free reference in subprog and outside", .insns = { BPF_SK_LOOKUP, @@ -13916,6 +14139,38 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = ACCEPT, }, { + "check wire_len is not readable by sockets", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, wire_len)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", + .result = REJECT, + }, + { + "check wire_len is readable by tc classifier", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, wire_len)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + }, + { + "check wire_len is not writable by tc classifier", + .insns = { + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, wire_len)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 leaks addr", + .result = REJECT, + }, + { "calls: cross frame pruning", .insns = { /* r8 = !!random(); @@ -13939,10 +14194,200 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, .errstr_unpriv = "function calls to other bpf functions are allowed for root only", + .errstr = "!read_ok", + .result = REJECT, + }, + { + "jset: functional", + .insns = { + /* r0 = 0 */ + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + /* prep for direct packet access via r2 */ + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_4, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_2, 0), + + /* reg, bit 63 or bit 0 set, taken */ + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_8, 0x8000000000000001), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_8, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + + /* reg, bit 62, not taken */ + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_8, 0x4000000000000000), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_8, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + + /* imm, any bit set, taken */ + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_7, -1, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + + /* imm, bit 31 set, taken */ + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_7, 0x80000000, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + + /* all good - return r0 == 2 */ + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .runs = 7, + .retvals = { + { .retval = 2, + .data64 = { (1ULL << 63) | (1U << 31) | (1U << 0), } + }, + { .retval = 2, + .data64 = { (1ULL << 63) | (1U << 31), } + }, + { .retval = 2, + .data64 = { (1ULL << 31) | (1U << 0), } + }, + { .retval = 2, + .data64 = { (__u32)-1, } + }, + { .retval = 2, + .data64 = { ~0x4000000000000000ULL, } + }, + { .retval = 0, + .data64 = { 0, } + }, + { .retval = 0, + .data64 = { ~0ULL, } + }, + }, + }, + { + "jset: sign-extend", + .insns = { + /* r0 = 0 */ + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + /* prep for direct packet access via r2 */ + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_4, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_2, 0), + + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_7, 0x80000000, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 2, + .data = { 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, }, + }, + { + "jset: known const compare", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_0, 1, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, + .retval_unpriv = 1, + .result_unpriv = ACCEPT, + .retval = 1, + .result = ACCEPT, + }, + { + "jset: known const compare bad", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_0, 1, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, + .errstr_unpriv = "!read_ok", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .errstr = "!read_ok", + .result = REJECT, + }, + { + "jset: unknown const compare taken", + .insns = { + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_0, 1, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, + .errstr_unpriv = "!read_ok", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .errstr = "!read_ok", .result = REJECT, }, + { + "jset: unknown const compare not taken", + .insns = { + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_0, 1, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, + .errstr_unpriv = "!read_ok", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .errstr = "!read_ok", + .result = REJECT, + }, + { + "jset: half-known const compare", + .insns = { + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_0, 2), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_0, 3, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, + .result_unpriv = ACCEPT, + .result = ACCEPT, + }, + { + "jset: range", + .insns = { + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, 0xff), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_1, 0xf0, 3), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_1, 0x10, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_1, 0x10, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_1, 0x10, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, + .result_unpriv = ACCEPT, + .result = ACCEPT, + }, }; static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp) @@ -14225,16 +14670,43 @@ out: return ret; } +static int do_prog_test_run(int fd_prog, bool unpriv, uint32_t expected_val, + void *data, size_t size_data) +{ + __u8 tmp[TEST_DATA_LEN << 2]; + __u32 size_tmp = sizeof(tmp); + uint32_t retval; + int err; + + if (unpriv) + set_admin(true); + err = bpf_prog_test_run(fd_prog, 1, data, size_data, + tmp, &size_tmp, &retval, NULL); + if (unpriv) + set_admin(false); + if (err && errno != 524/*ENOTSUPP*/ && errno != EPERM) { + printf("Unexpected bpf_prog_test_run error "); + return err; + } + if (!err && retval != expected_val && + expected_val != POINTER_VALUE) { + printf("FAIL retval %d != %d ", retval, expected_val); + return 1; + } + + return 0; +} + static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, int *passes, int *errors) { - int fd_prog, expected_ret, reject_from_alignment; + int fd_prog, expected_ret, alignment_prevented_execution; int prog_len, prog_type = test->prog_type; struct bpf_insn *prog = test->insns; + int run_errs, run_successes; int map_fds[MAX_NR_MAPS]; const char *expected_err; - uint32_t expected_val; - uint32_t retval; + __u32 pflags; int i, err; for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_MAPS; i++) @@ -14245,69 +14717,105 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, do_test_fixup(test, prog_type, prog, map_fds); prog_len = probe_filter_length(prog); - fd_prog = bpf_verify_program(prog_type, prog, prog_len, - test->flags & F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT, + pflags = 0; + if (test->flags & F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT) + pflags |= BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT; + if (test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) + pflags |= BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT; + fd_prog = bpf_verify_program(prog_type, prog, prog_len, pflags, "GPL", 0, bpf_vlog, sizeof(bpf_vlog), 1); expected_ret = unpriv && test->result_unpriv != UNDEF ? test->result_unpriv : test->result; expected_err = unpriv && test->errstr_unpriv ? test->errstr_unpriv : test->errstr; - expected_val = unpriv && test->retval_unpriv ? - test->retval_unpriv : test->retval; - - reject_from_alignment = fd_prog < 0 && - (test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) && - strstr(bpf_vlog, "misaligned"); -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS - if (reject_from_alignment) { - printf("FAIL\nFailed due to alignment despite having efficient unaligned access: '%s'!\n", - strerror(errno)); - goto fail_log; - } -#endif + + alignment_prevented_execution = 0; + if (expected_ret == ACCEPT) { - if (fd_prog < 0 && !reject_from_alignment) { + if (fd_prog < 0) { printf("FAIL\nFailed to load prog '%s'!\n", strerror(errno)); goto fail_log; } +#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS + if (fd_prog >= 0 && + (test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)) + alignment_prevented_execution = 1; +#endif } else { if (fd_prog >= 0) { printf("FAIL\nUnexpected success to load!\n"); goto fail_log; } - if (!strstr(bpf_vlog, expected_err) && !reject_from_alignment) { + if (!strstr(bpf_vlog, expected_err)) { printf("FAIL\nUnexpected error message!\n\tEXP: %s\n\tRES: %s\n", expected_err, bpf_vlog); goto fail_log; } } - if (fd_prog >= 0) { - __u8 tmp[TEST_DATA_LEN << 2]; - __u32 size_tmp = sizeof(tmp); - - if (unpriv) - set_admin(true); - err = bpf_prog_test_run(fd_prog, 1, test->data, - sizeof(test->data), tmp, &size_tmp, - &retval, NULL); - if (unpriv) - set_admin(false); - if (err && errno != 524/*ENOTSUPP*/ && errno != EPERM) { - printf("Unexpected bpf_prog_test_run error\n"); + if (test->insn_processed) { + uint32_t insn_processed; + char *proc; + + proc = strstr(bpf_vlog, "processed "); + insn_processed = atoi(proc + 10); + if (test->insn_processed != insn_processed) { + printf("FAIL\nUnexpected insn_processed %u vs %u\n", + insn_processed, test->insn_processed); goto fail_log; } - if (!err && retval != expected_val && - expected_val != POINTER_VALUE) { - printf("FAIL retval %d != %d\n", retval, expected_val); - goto fail_log; + } + + run_errs = 0; + run_successes = 0; + if (!alignment_prevented_execution && fd_prog >= 0) { + uint32_t expected_val; + int i; + + if (!test->runs) { + expected_val = unpriv && test->retval_unpriv ? + test->retval_unpriv : test->retval; + + err = do_prog_test_run(fd_prog, unpriv, expected_val, + test->data, sizeof(test->data)); + if (err) + run_errs++; + else + run_successes++; } + + for (i = 0; i < test->runs; i++) { + if (unpriv && test->retvals[i].retval_unpriv) + expected_val = test->retvals[i].retval_unpriv; + else + expected_val = test->retvals[i].retval; + + err = do_prog_test_run(fd_prog, unpriv, expected_val, + test->retvals[i].data, + sizeof(test->retvals[i].data)); + if (err) { + printf("(run %d/%d) ", i + 1, test->runs); + run_errs++; + } else { + run_successes++; + } + } + } + + if (!run_errs) { + (*passes)++; + if (run_successes > 1) + printf("%d cases ", run_successes); + printf("OK"); + if (alignment_prevented_execution) + printf(" (NOTE: not executed due to unknown alignment)"); + printf("\n"); + } else { + printf("\n"); + goto fail_log; } - (*passes)++; - printf("OK%s\n", reject_from_alignment ? - " (NOTE: reject due to unknown alignment)" : ""); close_fds: close(fd_prog); for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_MAPS; i++) |