| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When the support for polling drivers was initially added, it only
considered Input Queue 0. But as QDIO interrupts are actually for the
full device and not a single queue, this doesn't really fit for
configurations where multiple Input Queues are used.
Rework the qdio code so that interrupts for a polling driver are not
split up into actions for each queue. Instead deliver the interrupt as
a single event, and let the driver decide which queue needs what action.
When re-enabling the QDIO interrupt via qdio_start_irq(), this means
that the qdio code needs to
(1) put _all_ eligible queues back into a state where they raise IRQs,
(2) and afterwards check _all_ eligible queues for new work to bridge
the race window.
On the qeth side of things (as the only qdio polling driver), we can now
add CQ polling support to the main NAPI poll routine. It doesn't consume
NAPI budget, and to avoid hogging the CPU we yield control after
completing one full queue worth of buffers.
The subsequent qdio_start_irq() will check for any additional work, and
have us re-schedule the NAPI instance accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Whenever all completed RX buffers have been processed
(ie. rx->b_count == 0), we call down to the HW layer to scan for
additional buffers. If no further buffers are available, the code
breaks out of the while-loop.
So we never reach the 'process an RX buffer' step with rx->b_count == 0,
eliminate that check and one level of indentation.
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The main NAPI poll routine should eventually handle more types of work,
beyond just the RX ring.
Split off the RX poll logic into a separate function, and simplify the
nested while-loop.
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since RX buffers may contain multiple packets, qeth's NAPI poll code can
exhaust its budget in the middle of an RX buffer. Thus we keep track of
our current position within the active RX buffer, so we can resume
processing here in the next NAPI poll period.
Clean up that code by tracking the index of the active buffer element,
instead of a pointer to it.
Also simplify the code that advances to the next RX buffer when the
current buffer has been fully processed.
v2: - remove QDIO_ELEMENT_NO() macro (davem)
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TCP recvmsg() calls skb_copy_datagram_iter(), which
calls an indirect function (cb pointing to simple_copy_to_iter())
for every MSS (fragment) present in the skb.
CONFIG_RETPOLINE=y forces a very expensive operation
that we can avoid thanks to indirect call wrappers.
This patch gives a 13% increase of performance on
a single flow, if the bottleneck is the thread reading
the TCP socket.
Fixes: 950fcaecd5cc ("datagram: consolidate datagram copy to iter helpers")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_filter.c: In function cxgb4_get_free_ftid:
drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_filter.c:547:23:
warning: variable tab set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
commit 8d174351f285 ("cxgb4: rework TC filter rule insertion across regions")
involved this, remove it.
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We are having multiple review cycles with all vendors trying
to implement devlink-info. Let's expand the documentation with
more information about what's implemented and motivation behind
this interface in an attempt to make the implementations easier.
Describe what each info section is supposed to contain, and make
some references to other HW interfaces (PCI caps).
Document how firmware management is expected to look, to make
it clear how devlink-info and devlink-flash work in concert.
Name some future work.
v2: - improve wording
v3: - improve wording
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It looks like the VSC8584 PHY driver is rolling its own RGMII delay
configuration code, despite the fact that the logic is mostly the same.
In fact only the register layout and position for the RGMII controls has
changed. So we need to adapt and parameterize the PHY-dependent bit
fields when calling the new generic function.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Tested-by: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Andre Przywara says:
====================
net: axienet: Update error handling and add 64-bit DMA support
a minor update, fixing the 32-bit build breakage, and brightening up
Dave's christmas tree. Rebased against latest net-next/master.
This series is based on net-next as of today (9970de8b013a), which
includes Russell's fixes [1], solving the SGMII issues I have had.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/E1j6trA-0003GY-N1@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk/
Changelog v2 .. v3:
- Use two "left-shifts by 16" to fix builds with 32-bit phys_addr_t
- reorder variable declarations
Changelog v1 .. v2:
- Add Reviewed-by: tags from Radhey
- Extend kerndoc documentation
- Convert DMA error handler tasklet to work queue
- log DMA mapping errors
- mark DMA mapping error checks as unlikely (in "hot" paths)
- return NETDEV_TX_OK on TX DMA mapping error (increasing TX drop counter)
- Request eth IRQ as an optional IRQ
- Remove no longer needed MDIO IRQ register names
- Drop DT propery check for address width, assume full 64 bit
This series updates the Xilinx Axienet driver to work on our board
here. One big issue was broken SGMII support, which Russell fixed already
(in net-next).
While debugging and understanding the driver, I found several problems
in the error handling and cleanup paths, which patches 2-7 address.
Patch 8 removes a annoying error message, patch 9 paves the way for newer
revisions of the IP. The next patch adds mii-tool support, just for good
measure.
The next four patches add support for 64-bit DMA. This is an integration
option on newer IP revisions (>= v7.1), and expects MSB bits in formerly
reserved registers. Without writing to those MSB registers, the state
machine won't trigger, so it's mandatory to access them, even if they
are zero. Patches 11 and 12 prepare the code by adding accessors, to
wrap this properly and keep it working on older IP revisions.
Patch 13 enables access to the MSB registers, by trying to write a
non-zero value to them and checking if that sticks. Older IP revisions
always read those registers as zero.
Patch 14 then adjusts the DMA mask, based on the autodetected MSB
feature. It uses the full 64 bits in this case, the rest of the system
(actual physical addresses in use) should provide a natural limit if the
chip has connected fewer address lines. If not, the parent DT node can
use a dma-range property.
The Xilinx PG138 and PG021 documents (in versions 7.1 in both cases)
were used for this series.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
With all DMA address accesses wrapped, we can actually support 64-bit
DMA if this option was chosen at IP integration time.
If the IP has been configured for an address width greater than 32 bits,
we assume the full 64 bit DMA width is working. In practise this will be
limited by the actual system address bus width, which will ideally be the
same as the DMA IP address width.
If this is not the case, the actual width can still be configured using a
dma-ranges property in the parent of the MAC node.
This increases the DMA mask on those systems to let the kernel choose
buffers from memory at higher addresses.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
When newer revisions of the Axienet IP are configured for a 64-bit bus,
we *need* to write to the MSB part of the an address registers,
otherwise the IP won't recognise this as a DMA start condition.
This is even true when the actual DMA address comes from the lower 4 GB.
To autodetect this configuration, at probe time we write all 1's to such
an MSB register, and see if any bits stick. If this is configured for a
32-bit bus, those MSB registers are RES0, so reading back 0 indicates
that no MSB writes are necessary.
On the other hands reading anything other than 0 indicated the need to
write the MSB registers, so we set the respective flag.
The actual DMA mask stays at 32-bit for now. To help bisecting, a
separate patch will enable allocations from higher addresses.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Newer revisions of the AXI DMA IP (>= v7.1) support 64-bit addresses,
both for the descriptors itself, as well as for the buffers they are
pointing to.
This is realised by adding "MSB" words for the next and phys pointer
right behind the existing address word, now named "LSB". These MSB words
live in formerly reserved areas of the descriptor.
If the hardware supports it, write both words when setting an address.
The buffer address is handled by two wrapper functions, the two
occasions where we set the next pointers are open coded.
For now this is guarded by a flag which we don't set yet.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Newer versions of the Xilink DMA IP support busses with more than 32
address bits, by introducing an MSB word for the registers holding DMA
pointers (tail/current, RX/TX descriptor addresses).
On IP configured for more than 32 bits, it is also *required* to write
both words, to let the IP recognise this as a start condition for an
MM2S request, for instance.
Wrap the DMA pointer writes with a separate function, to add this
functionality later. For now we stick to the lower 32 bits.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
mii-tool is useful for debugging, and all it requires to work is to wire
up the ioctl ops function pointer.
Add this to the axienet driver to enable mii-tool.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Newer revisions of the IP don't have these registers. Since we don't
really use them, just drop them from the ethtools dump.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
According to the DT binding, the Ethernet core interrupt is optional.
Use platform_get_irq_optional() to avoid the error message when the
IRQ is not specified.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Especially with the default 32-bit DMA mask, DMA buffers are a limited
resource, so their allocation can fail.
So as the DMA API documentation requires, add error checking code after
dma_map_single() calls to catch the case where we run out of "low" memory.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Factor out the code that cleans up a number of connected TX descriptors,
as we will need it to properly roll back a failed _xmit() call.
There are subtle differences between cleaning up a successfully sent
chain (unknown number of involved descriptors, total data size needed)
and a chain that was about to set up (number of descriptors known), so
cater for those variations with some extra parameters.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Since 0 is a valid DMA address, we cannot use the physical address to
check whether a TX descriptor is valid and is holding a DMA mapping.
Use the "cntrl" member of the descriptor to make this decision, as it
contains at least the length of the buffer, so 0 points to an
uninitialised buffer.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
When axienet_dma_bd_init() bails out during the initialisation process,
it might do so with parts of the structure already allocated and
initialised, while other parts have not been touched yet. Before
returning in this case, we call axienet_dma_bd_release(), which does not
take care of this corner case.
This is most obvious by the first loop happily dereferencing
lp->rx_bd_v, which we actually check to be non NULL *afterwards*.
Make sure we only unmap or free already allocated structures, by:
- directly returning with -ENOMEM if nothing has been allocated at all
- checking for lp->rx_bd_v to be non-NULL *before* using it
- only unmapping allocated DMA RX regions
This avoids NULL pointer dereferences when initialisation fails.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
When we fail allocating the DMA buffers in axienet_dma_bd_init(), we
report this error, but carry on with initialisation nevertheless.
This leads to a kernel panic when the driver later wants to send a
packet, as it uses uninitialised data structures.
Make the axienet_device_reset() routine return an error value, as it
contains the DMA buffer initialisation. Make sure we propagate the error
up the chain and eventually fail the driver initialisation, to avoid
relying on non-initialised buffers.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The DMA error handler routine is currently a tasklet, scheduled to run
after the DMA error IRQ was handled.
However it needs to take the MDIO mutex, which is not allowed to do in a
tasklet. A kernel (with debug options) complains consequently:
[ 614.050361] net eth0: DMA Tx error 0x174019
[ 614.064002] net eth0: Current BD is at: 0x8f84aa0ce
[ 614.080195] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:935
[ 614.109484] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 40, name: kworker/u4:4
[ 614.135428] 3 locks held by kworker/u4:4/40:
[ 614.149075] #0: ffff000879863328 ((wq_completion)rpciod){....}, at: process_one_work+0x1f0/0x6a8
[ 614.177528] #1: ffff80001251bdf8 ((work_completion)(&task->u.tk_work)){....}, at: process_one_work+0x1f0/0x6a8
[ 614.209033] #2: ffff0008784e0110 (sk_lock-AF_INET-RPC){....}, at: tcp_sendmsg+0x24/0x58
[ 614.235429] CPU: 0 PID: 40 Comm: kworker/u4:4 Not tainted 5.6.0-rc3-00926-g4a165a9d5921 #26
[ 614.260854] Hardware name: ARM Test FPGA (DT)
[ 614.274734] Workqueue: rpciod rpc_async_schedule
[ 614.289022] Call trace:
[ 614.296871] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1a0
[ 614.308311] show_stack+0x14/0x20
[ 614.318751] dump_stack+0xbc/0x100
[ 614.329403] ___might_sleep+0xf0/0x140
[ 614.341018] __might_sleep+0x4c/0x80
[ 614.352201] __mutex_lock+0x5c/0x8a8
[ 614.363348] mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x28
[ 614.375654] axienet_dma_err_handler+0x38/0x388
[ 614.389999] tasklet_action_common.isra.15+0x160/0x1a8
[ 614.405894] tasklet_action+0x24/0x30
[ 614.417297] efi_header_end+0xe0/0x494
[ 614.429020] irq_exit+0xd0/0xd8
[ 614.439047] __handle_domain_irq+0x60/0xb0
[ 614.451877] gic_handle_irq+0xdc/0x2d0
[ 614.463486] el1_irq+0xcc/0x180
[ 614.473451] __tcp_transmit_skb+0x41c/0xb58
[ 614.486513] tcp_write_xmit+0x224/0x10a0
[ 614.498792] __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x38/0xc8
[ 614.513126] tcp_rcv_established+0x41c/0x820
[ 614.526301] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x8c/0x218
[ 614.537784] __release_sock+0x5c/0x108
[ 614.549466] release_sock+0x34/0xa0
[ 614.560318] tcp_sendmsg+0x40/0x58
[ 614.571053] inet_sendmsg+0x40/0x68
[ 614.582061] sock_sendmsg+0x18/0x30
[ 614.593074] xs_sendpages+0x218/0x328
[ 614.604506] xs_tcp_send_request+0xa0/0x1b8
[ 614.617461] xprt_transmit+0xc8/0x4f0
[ 614.628943] call_transmit+0x8c/0xa0
[ 614.640028] __rpc_execute+0xbc/0x6f8
[ 614.651380] rpc_async_schedule+0x28/0x48
[ 614.663846] process_one_work+0x298/0x6a8
[ 614.676299] worker_thread+0x40/0x490
[ 614.687687] kthread+0x134/0x138
[ 614.697804] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
[ 614.717319] xilinx_axienet 7fe00000.ethernet eth0: Link is Down
[ 615.748343] xilinx_axienet 7fe00000.ethernet eth0: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full - flow control off
Since tasklets are not really popular anymore anyway, lets convert this
over to a work queue, which can sleep and thus can take the MDIO mutex.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Similar to axienet, the temac driver is now architecture agnostic, and
can be at least compiled for several architectures.
Especially the fact that this is a soft IP for implementing in FPGAs
makes the current restriction rather pointless, as it could literally
appear on any architecture, as long as an FPGA is connected to the bus.
The driver hasn't been actually tried on any hardware, it is just a
drive-by patch when doing the same for axienet (a similar patch for
axienet is already merged).
This (temac and axienet) have been compile-tested for:
alpha hppa64 microblaze mips64 powerpc powerpc64 riscv64 s390 sparc64
(using kernel.org cross compilers).
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently, ethtool feature mask for checksum command is ORed with
NETIF_F_FCOE_CRC_BIT, which is bit's position number, instead of the
actual feature bit - NETIF_F_FCOE_CRC.
The invalid bitmask here might affect unrelated features when toggling
TX checksumming. For example, TX checksumming is always mistakenly
reported as enabled on the netdevs tested (mlx5, virtio_net).
Fixes: f70bb06563ed ("ethtool: update mapping of features to legacy ioctl requests")
Signed-off-by: Vladyslav Tarasiuk <vladyslavt@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
use readl_poll_timeout() to replace the poll codes for simplify
iproc_mdio_wait_for_idle() function
Signed-off-by: Dejin Zheng <zhengdejin5@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/wireless-drivers-next
Kalle Valo says:
====================
wireless-drivers-next patches for v5.7
Second set of patches for v5.7. Lots of cleanup patches this time, but
of course various new features as well fixes.
When merging with wireless-drivers this pull request has a conflict in:
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/drv.c
To solve that just drop the changes from commit cf52c8a776d1 in
wireless-drivers and take the hunk from wireless-drivers-next as is.
The list of specific subsystem device IDs are not necessary after
commit d6f2134a3831 (in wireless-drivers-next) anymore, the detection
is based on other characteristics of the devices.
Major changes:
qtnfmac
* support WPA3 SAE and OWE in AP mode
ath10k
* support for getting btcoex settings from Device Tree
* support QCA9377 SDIO device
ath11k
* add HE rate accounting
* add thermal sensor and cooling devices
mt76
* MT7663 support for the MT7615 driver
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix the warning reported by sparse as:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c:4819:17: sparse: sparse: cast from restricted __le16
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c:4892:17: sparse: sparse: cast from restricted __le16
Signed-off-by: Chris Chiu <chiu@endlessm.com>
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jes Sorensen <jes@trained-monkey.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319064341.49500-1-chiu@endlessm.com
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Add mt7615_mcu_wait_response declaration in mt7615.h since it will be
reused adding usb support to mt7615 driver
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Fixes: 044a43256a35 ("mt76: mt7615: introduce mt7615_mcu_wait_response")
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d341335a636b6ccd088dd2cfeec2d296eb4dc8c7.1584534454.git.lorenzo@kernel.org
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix cid field endianness in unified mt7615_uni_txd header
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Fixes: 323d7daad363 ("mt76: mt7615: introduce uni cmd command types")
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2447b399d3c63885d43f65ba988c057fa96f5236.1584534454.git.lorenzo@kernel.org
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Convert fields in mt7663_fw_trailer and mt7663_fw_buf to little-endian
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Fixes: f40ac0f3d3c0 ("mt76: mt7615: introduce mt7663e support")
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d14dfd7cd91a4dda8c5dcd03e8a70ff11314182e.1584534454.git.lorenzo@kernel.org
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
After MAC switched power, the hardware's RF registers will have
its default value, but the default value for path B is incorrect.
So, load RF path B first, to decrease the period between MAC on
and RF path B config.
By test, if we load path A first, then there's ~300ms that the
path B is incorrect, it could lead to BT coex's A2DP glitch.
But if we configure path B first, there will only have ~3ms,
significantly lower possibility to have A2DP sound glitch.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200318095224.12940-1-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Driver used to kick off every TX packets, that will waste some
time while we can do better to kick off the TX packets once after
they are all prepared to be transmitted.
For PCI, it uses DMA engine to transfer the SKBs to the device,
and the transition of the state of the DMA engine could be a cost.
Driver can save some time to kick off multiple SKBs once so that
the DMA engine will have only one transition.
So, split rtw_hci_ops::tx() to rtw_hci_ops::tx_write() and
rtw_hci_ops::tx_kick_off() to explicitly kick the SKBs off after
they are written to the prepared buffer. For packets come from
ieee80211_ops::tx(), write one and then kick it off immediately.
For packets queued in TX queue, which come from
ieee80211_ops::wake_tx_queue(), we can dequeue them, write them
to the buffer, and then kick them off together.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200312080852.16684-6-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Add a macro TRX_BD_IDX_MASK for access the TX/RX BD indexes.
The hardware has only 12 bits for TX/RX BD indexes, we should not
initialize a TX/RX ring or access the TX/RX BD index with a length
that is larger than TRX_BD_IDX_MASK.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200312080852.16684-5-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Each device has only one reserved page shared with all of the
vifs, so it seems not reasonable to pass vif as one of the
arguments to rtw_fw_download_rsvd_page(). If driver is going
to run more than one vif, the content of reserved page could
not be built for all of the vifs.
To fix it, let each vif maintain its own reserved page list,
and build the final reserved page to download to the firmware
from all of the vifs. Hence driver should add reserved pages
to each vif according to the vif->type when adding the vif.
For station mode, add reserved page with rtw_add_rsvd_page_sta().
If the station mode is going to suspend in PNO (net-detect)
mode, remove the reserved pages used for normal mode, and add
new one for wowlan mode with rtw_add_rsvd_page_pno().
For beacon mode, only beacon is required to be added using
rtw_add_rsvd_page_bcn().
This would make the code flow simpler as we don't need to
add reserved pages when vif is running, just add/remove them
when ieee80211_ops::[add|remove]_interface.
When driver is going to download the reserved page, it will
collect pages from all of the vifs, this list is maintained
by rtwdev, with build_list as the pages' member. That way, we
can still build a list of reserved pages to be downloaded.
Also we can get the location of the pages from the list that
is maintained by rtwdev.
The biggest problem is that the first page should always be
beacon, if other type of reserved page is put in the first
page, the tx descriptor and offset could be wrong.
But station mode vif does not add beacon into its list, so
we need to add a dummy page in front of the list, to make
sure other pages will not be put in the first page. As the
dummy page is allocated when building the list, we must free
it before building a new list of reserved pages to firmware.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200312080852.16684-4-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Extract skb allocation routines for rsvd_page and h2c.
These routines should also be used by USB and SDIO.
This should not change the logic at all.
memset() for pkt_info is unnecessary, just declare as {0}.
Also skb_put()/memcpy() can be replaced by skb_put_data().
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200312080852.16684-3-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This driver generally only needs to ensure that
(a) it doesn't try to process TX interrupts at the same time as
power-save operations (and similar)
(b) the device interrupt gets disabled while we're still handling the
last set of interrupts
For (a), all the operations (e.g., PS transitions, packet handling)
happens in non-atomic contexts (e.g., threaded IRQ).
For (b), we only need mutual exclusion for brief sections (i.e., while
we're actually manipulating the interrupt mask/status).
So, we can introduce a separate lock for handling (b), disabling IRQs
while we do it. For (a), we can demote the locking to BH only, now that
(b) (the only steps done in atomic context) and that has its own lock.
This helps reduce the amount of time this driver spends with IRQs off.
Notably, transitioning out of power-save modes can take >3 milliseconds,
and this transition is done under the protection of 'irq_lock'.
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200312080852.16684-2-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319230617.GA15035@embeddedor.com
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319230525.GA14835@embeddedor.com
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319225133.GA29672@embeddedor.com
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319225002.GA28673@embeddedor.com
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200305111401.GA25126@embeddedor
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200305111216.GA24982@embeddedor
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Acked-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225020804.GA9428@embeddedor
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Acked-by: Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi.bhat@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225020413.GA8057@embeddedor
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225011846.GA2773@embeddedor
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225011709.GA601@embeddedor
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225011415.GA31868@embeddedor
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225011151.GA30675@embeddedor
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225003408.GA28675@embeddedor
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225002746.GA26789@embeddedor
|
