| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-40-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-39-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-38-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-37-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-36-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-35-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-34-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-33-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-32-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-31-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-30-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-29-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-28-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-27-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-26-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
returning void
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-25-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
returning void
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-24-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
returning void
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-23-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-22-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-21-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-20-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-19-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-18-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-17-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-16-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-15-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-14-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-13-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-12-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
callback returning void
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-11-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-10-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-9-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
void
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-8-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-7-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-6-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-5-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-4-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-3-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Olivier Dautricourt <olivierdautricourt@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919133207.1400430-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Pull drm ci scripts from Dave Airlie:
"This is a bunch of ci integration for the freedesktop gitlab instance
where we currently do upstream userspace testing on diverse sets of
GPU hardware. From my perspective I think it's an experiment worth
going with and seeing how the benefits/noise playout keeping these
files useful.
Ideally I'd like to get this so we can do pre-merge testing on PRs
eventually.
Below is some info from danvet on why we've ended up making the
decision and how we can roll it back if we decide it was a bad plan.
Why in upstream?
- like documentation, testcases, tools CI integration is one of these
things where you can waste endless amounts of time if you
accidentally have a version that doesn't match your source code
- but also like the above, there's a balance, this is the initial cut
of what we think makes sense to keep in sync vs out-of-tree,
probably needs adjustment
- gitlab supports out-of-repo gitlab integration and that's what's
been used for the kernel in drm, but it results in per-driver
fragmentation and lots of duplicated effort. the simple act of
smashing an arbitrary winner into a topic branch already started
surfacing patches on dri-devel and sparking good cross driver team
discussions
Why gitlab?
- it's not any more shit than any of the other CI
- drm userspace uses it extensively for everything in userspace, we
have a lot of people and experience with this, including
integration of hw testing labs
- media userspace like gstreamer is also on gitlab.fd.o, and there's
discussion to extend this to the media subsystem in some fashion
Can this be shared?
- there's definitely a pile of code that could move to scripts/ if
other subsystem adopt ci integration in upstream kernel git. other
bits are more drm/gpu specific like the igt-gpu-tests/tools
integration
- docker images can be run locally or in other CI runners
Will we regret this?
- it's all in one directory, intentionally, for easy deletion
- probably 1-2 years in upstream to see whether this is worth it or a
Big Mistake. that's roughly what it took to _really_ roll out solid
CI in the bigger userspace projects we have on gitlab.fd.o like
mesa3d"
* tag 'topic/drm-ci-2023-08-31-1' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm:
drm: ci: docs: fix build warning - add missing escape
drm: Add initial ci/ subdirectory
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix the following warning:
Documentation/gpu/automated_testing.rst:55: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Helen Koike <helen.koike@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230824164230.48470-1-helen.koike@collabora.com
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Developers can easily execute several tests on different devices
by just pushing their branch to their fork in a repository hosted
on gitlab.freedesktop.org which has an infrastructure to run jobs
in several runners and farms with different devices.
There are also other automated tools that uprev dependencies,
monitor the infra, and so on that are already used by the Mesa
project, and we can reuse them too.
Also, store expectations about what the DRM drivers are supposed
to pass in the IGT test suite. By storing the test expectations
along with the code, we can make sure both stay in sync with each
other so we can know when a code change breaks those expectations.
Also, include a configuration file that points to the out-of-tree
CI scripts.
This will allow all contributors to drm to reuse the infrastructure
already in gitlab.freedesktop.org to test the driver on several
generations of the hardware.
Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Helen Koike <helen.koike@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
[sima: Remove top-level empty file test, spotted by sfr]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230811171953.176431-1-helen.koike@collabora.com
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull x86 fixes from Ingo Molnar:
"Fix preemption delays in the SGX code, remove unnecessarily
UAPI-exported code, fix a ld.lld linker (in)compatibility quirk and
make the x86 SMP init code a bit more conservative to fix kexec()
lockups"
* tag 'x86-urgent-2023-09-10' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
x86/sgx: Break up long non-preemptible delays in sgx_vepc_release()
x86: Remove the arch_calc_vm_prot_bits() macro from the UAPI
x86/build: Fix linker fill bytes quirk/incompatibility for ld.lld
x86/smp: Don't send INIT to non-present and non-booted CPUs
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
On large enclaves we hit the softlockup warning with following call trace:
xa_erase()
sgx_vepc_release()
__fput()
task_work_run()
do_exit()
The latency issue is similar to the one fixed in:
8795359e35bc ("x86/sgx: Silence softlockup detection when releasing large enclaves")
The test system has 64GB of enclave memory, and all is assigned to a single VM.
Release of 'vepc' takes a longer time and causes long latencies, which triggers
the softlockup warning.
Add cond_resched() to give other tasks a chance to run and reduce
latencies, which also avoids the softlockup detector.
[ mingo: Rewrote the changelog. ]
Fixes: 540745ddbc70 ("x86/sgx: Introduce virtual EPC for use by KVM guests")
Reported-by: Yu Zhang <yu.zhang@ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Yu Zhang <yu.zhang@ionos.com>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
The arch_calc_vm_prot_bits() macro uses VM_PKEY_BIT0 etc. which are
not part of the UAPI, so the macro is completely useless for userspace.
It is also hidden behind the CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
config switch which we shouldn't expose to userspace. Thus let's move
this macro into a new internal header instead.
Fixes: 8f62c883222c ("x86/mm/pkeys: Add arch-specific VMA protection bits")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230906162658.142511-1-thuth@redhat.com
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
With ":text =0xcccc", ld.lld fills unused text area with 0xcccc0000.
Example objdump -D output:
ffffffff82b04203: 00 00 add %al,(%rax)
ffffffff82b04205: cc int3
ffffffff82b04206: cc int3
ffffffff82b04207: 00 00 add %al,(%rax)
ffffffff82b04209: cc int3
ffffffff82b0420a: cc int3
Replace it with ":text =0xcccccccc", so we get the following instead:
ffffffff82b04203: cc int3
ffffffff82b04204: cc int3
ffffffff82b04205: cc int3
ffffffff82b04206: cc int3
ffffffff82b04207: cc int3
ffffffff82b04208: cc int3
gcc/ld doesn't seem to have the same issue. The generated code stays the
same for gcc/ld.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Fixes: 7705dc855797 ("x86/vmlinux: Use INT3 instead of NOP for linker fill bytes")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230906175215.2236033-1-song@kernel.org
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Vasant reported that kexec() can hang or reset the machine when it tries to
park CPUs via INIT. This happens when the kernel is using extended APIC,
but the present mask has APIC IDs >= 0x100 enumerated.
As extended APIC can only handle 8 bit of APIC ID sending INIT to APIC ID
0x100 sends INIT to APIC ID 0x0. That's the boot CPU which is special on
x86 and INIT causes the system to hang or resets the machine.
Prevent this by sending INIT only to those CPUs which have been booted
once.
Fixes: 45e34c8af58f ("x86/smp: Put CPUs into INIT on shutdown if possible")
Reported-by: Dheeraj Kumar Srivastava <dheerajkumar.srivastava@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87cyzwjbff.ffs@tglx
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull x86 perf event fix from Ingo Molnar:
"Work around a firmware bug in the uncore PMU driver, affecting certain
Intel systems"
* tag 'perf-urgent-2023-09-10' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
perf/x86/uncore: Correct the number of CHAs on EMR
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Starting from SPR, the basic uncore PMON information is retrieved from
the discovery table (resides in an MMIO space populated by BIOS). It is
called the discovery method. The existing value of the type->num_boxes
is from the discovery table.
On some SPR variants, there is a firmware bug that makes the value from the
discovery table incorrect. We use the value from the
SPR_MSR_UNC_CBO_CONFIG MSR to replace the one from the discovery table:
38776cc45eb7 ("perf/x86/uncore: Correct the number of CHAs on SPR")
Unfortunately, the SPR_MSR_UNC_CBO_CONFIG isn't available for the EMR
XCC (Always returns 0), but the above firmware bug doesn't impact the
EMR XCC.
Don't let the value from the MSR replace the existing value from the
discovery table.
Fixes: 38776cc45eb7 ("perf/x86/uncore: Correct the number of CHAs on SPR")
Reported-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Reported-by: Yunying Sun <yunying.sun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Yunying Sun <yunying.sun@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230905134248.496114-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
|