summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation/device-mapper/dm-raid.txt (follow)
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* MD: Remember the last sync operation that was performedJonathan Brassow2013-06-261-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | MD: Remember the last sync operation that was performed This patch adds a field to the mddev structure to track the last sync operation that was performed. This is especially useful when it comes to what is recorded in mismatch_cnt in sysfs. If the last operation was "data-check", then it reports the number of descrepancies found by the user-initiated check. If it was a "repair" operation, then it is reporting the number of descrepancies repaired. etc. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
* DM RAID: Add ability to restore transiently failed devices on resumeJonathan Brassow2013-06-141-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | DM RAID: Add ability to restore transiently failed devices on resume This patch adds code to the resume function to check over the devices in the RAID array. If any are found to be marked as failed and their superblocks can be read, an attempt is made to reintegrate them into the array. This allows the user to refresh the array with a simple suspend and resume of the array - rather than having to load a completely new table, allocate and initialize all the structures and throw away the old instantiation. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
* DM RAID: Add message/status support for changing sync actionJonathan Brassow2013-04-241-17/+67
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | DM RAID: Add message/status support for changing sync action This patch adds a message interface to dm-raid to allow the user to more finely control the sync actions being performed by the MD driver. This gives the user the ability to initiate "check" and "repair" (i.e. scrubbing). Two additional fields have been appended to the status output to provide more information about the type of sync action occurring and the results of those actions, specifically: <sync_action> and <mismatch_cnt>. These new fields will always be populated. This is essentially the device-mapper way of doing what MD controls through the 'sync_action' sysfs file and shows through the 'mismatch_cnt' sysfs file. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
* DM RAID: Add support for MD's RAID10 "far" and "offset" algorithmsJonathan Brassow2013-02-261-7/+37
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | DM RAID: Add support for MD's RAID10 "far" and "offset" algorithms Until now, dm-raid.c only supported the "near" algorthm of MD's RAID10 implementation. This patch adds support for the "far" and "offset" algorithms, but only with the improved redundancy that is brought with the introduction of the 'use_far_sets' bit, which shifts copied stripes according to smaller sets vs the entire array. That is, the 17th bit of the 'layout' variable that defines the RAID10 implementation will always be set. (More information on how the 'layout' variable selects the RAID10 algorithm can be found in the opening comments of drivers/md/raid10.c.) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
* DM-RAID: Fix RAID10's check for sufficient redundancyJonathan Brassow2013-01-241-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Before attempting to activate a RAID array, it is checked for sufficient redundancy. That is, we make sure that there are not too many failed devices - or devices specified for rebuild - to undermine our ability to activate the array. The current code performs this check twice - once to ensure there were not too many devices specified for rebuild by the user ('validate_rebuild_devices') and again after possibly experiencing a failure to read the superblock ('analyse_superblocks'). Neither of these checks are sufficient. The first check is done properly but with insufficient information about the possible failure state of the devices to make a good determination if the array can be activated. The second check is simply done wrong in the case of RAID10 because it doesn't account for the independence of the stripes (i.e. mirror sets). The solution is to use the properly written check ('validate_rebuild_devices'), but perform the check after the superblocks have been read and we know which devices have failed. This gives us one check instead of two and performs it in a location where it can be done right. Only RAID10 was affected and it was affected in the following ways: - the code did not properly catch the condition where a user specified a device for rebuild that already had a failed device in the same mirror set. (This condition would, however, be caught at a deeper level in MD.) - the code triggers a false positive and denies activation when devices in independent mirror sets have failed - counting the failures as though they were all in the same set. The most likely place this error was introduced (or this patch should have been included) is in commit 4ec1e369 - first introduced in v3.7-rc1. Consequently this fix should also go in v3.7.y, however there is a small conflict on the .version in raid_target, so I'll submit a separate patch to -stable. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
* DM RAID: Add rebuild capability for RAID10Jonathan Brassow2012-10-111-0/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | DM RAID: Add code to validate replacement slots for RAID10 arrays RAID10 can handle 'copies - 1' failures for each mirror group. This code ensures the user has provided a valid array - one whose devices specified for rebuild do not exceed the amount of redundancy available. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
* DM RAID: Add support for MD RAID10Jonathan Brassow2012-08-011-0/+26
| | | | | | | Support the MD RAID10 personality through dm-raid.c Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
* Documentation: Fix multiple typo in DocumentationMasanari Iida2012-03-071-1/+1
| | | | | | Signed-off-by: Masanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
* dm raid: support metadata devicesJonathan Brassow2011-08-021-6/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add the ability to parse and use metadata devices to dm-raid. Although not strictly required, without the metadata devices, many features of RAID are unavailable. They are used to store a superblock and bitmap. The role, or position in the array, of each device must be recorded in its superblock. This is to help with fault handling, array reshaping, and sanity checks. RAID 4/5/6 devices must be loaded in a specific order: in this way, the 'array_position' field helps validate the correctness of the mapping when it is loaded. It can be used during reshaping to identify which devices are added/removed. Fault handling is impossible without this field. For example, when a device fails it is recorded in the superblock. If this is a RAID1 device and the offending device is removed from the array, there must be a way during subsequent array assembly to determine that the failed device was the one removed. This is done by correlating the 'array_position' field and the bit-field variable 'failed_devices'. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
* dm raid: add write_mostly parameterJonathan Brassow2011-08-021-1/+3
| | | | | | | | | | Add the write_mostly parameter to RAID1 dm-raid tables. This allows the user to set the WriteMostly flag on a RAID1 device that should normally be avoided for read I/O. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
* dm raid: add region_size parameterJonathan Brassow2011-08-021-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | Allow the user to specify the region_size. Ensures that the supplied value meets md's constraints, viz. the number of regions does not exceed 2^21. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
* dm raid: improve table parameters documentationJonathan Brassow2011-08-021-46/+78
| | | | | | | | Add more information about some dm-raid table parameters and clarify how parameters are printed when 'dmsetup table' is issued. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
* dm: raid456 basic supportNeilBrown2011-01-131-0/+70
This patch is the skeleton for the DM target that will be the bridge from DM to MD (initially RAID456 and later RAID1). It provides a way to use device-mapper interfaces to the MD RAID456 drivers. As with all device-mapper targets, the nominal public interfaces are the constructor (CTR) tables and the status outputs (both STATUSTYPE_INFO and STATUSTYPE_TABLE). The CTR table looks like the following: 1: <s> <l> raid \ 2: <raid_type> <#raid_params> <raid_params> \ 3: <#raid_devs> <meta_dev1> <dev1> .. <meta_devN> <devN> Line 1 contains the standard first three arguments to any device-mapper target - the start, length, and target type fields. The target type in this case is "raid". Line 2 contains the arguments that define the particular raid type/personality/level, the required arguments for that raid type, and any optional arguments. Possible raid types include: raid4, raid5_la, raid5_ls, raid5_rs, raid6_zr, raid6_nr, and raid6_nc. (again, raid1 is planned for the future.) The list of required and optional parameters is the same for all the current raid types. The required parameters are positional, while the optional parameters are given as key/value pairs. The possible parameters are as follows: <chunk_size> Chunk size in sectors. [[no]sync] Force/Prevent RAID initialization [rebuild <idx>] Rebuild the drive indicated by the index [daemon_sleep <ms>] Time between bitmap daemon work to clear bits [min_recovery_rate <kB/sec/disk>] Throttle RAID initialization [max_recovery_rate <kB/sec/disk>] Throttle RAID initialization [max_write_behind <value>] See '-write-behind=' (man mdadm) [stripe_cache <sectors>] Stripe cache size for higher RAIDs Line 3 contains the list of devices that compose the array in metadata/data device pairs. If the metadata is stored separately, a '-' is given for the metadata device position. If a drive has failed or is missing at creation time, a '-' can be given for both the metadata and data drives for a given position. Examples: # RAID4 - 4 data drives, 1 parity # No metadata devices specified to hold superblock/bitmap info # Chunk size of 1MiB # (Lines separated for easy reading) 0 1960893648 raid \ raid4 1 2048 \ 5 - 8:17 - 8:33 - 8:49 - 8:65 - 8:81 # RAID4 - 4 data drives, 1 parity (no metadata devices) # Chunk size of 1MiB, force RAID initialization, # min recovery rate at 20 kiB/sec/disk 0 1960893648 raid \ raid4 4 2048 min_recovery_rate 20 sync\ 5 - 8:17 - 8:33 - 8:49 - 8:65 - 8:81 Performing a 'dmsetup table' should display the CTR table used to construct the mapping (with possible reordering of optional parameters). Performing a 'dmsetup status' will yield information on the state and health of the array. The output is as follows: 1: <s> <l> raid \ 2: <raid_type> <#devices> <1 health char for each dev> <resync_ratio> Line 1 is standard DM output. Line 2 is best shown by example: 0 1960893648 raid raid4 5 AAAAA 2/490221568 Here we can see the RAID type is raid4, there are 5 devices - all of which are 'A'live, and the array is 2/490221568 complete with recovery. Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>