| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
net/wireless/nl80211.c
b27f07c50a73 ("wifi: nl80211: fix puncturing bitmap policy")
cbbaf2bb829b ("wifi: nl80211: add a command to enable/disable HW timestamping")
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230314105421.3608efae@canb.auug.org.au
tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile
62199e3f1658 ("selftests: net: Add VXLAN MDB test")
13715acf8ab5 ("selftest: Add test for bind() conflicts.")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
I relicensed Netlink spec code to GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause but
we still put a slightly different license on the uAPI header
than the rest of the code. Use the Linux-syscall-note on all
the specs and all generated code. It's moot for kernel code,
but should not hurt. This way the licenses match everywhere.
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Fixes: 37d9df224d1e ("ynl: re-license uniformly under GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause")
Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Chuck wanted to put the UAPI header in linux/net/ which seems
reasonable, allow genetlink families to choose the location.
It doesn't really matter for non-C-like languages.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I was intending to make all the Netlink Spec code BSD-3-Clause
to ease the adoption but it appears that:
- I fumbled the uAPI and used "GPL WITH uAPI note" there
- it gives people pause as they expect GPL in the kernel
As suggested by Chuck re-license under dual. This gives us benefit
of full BSD freedom while fulfilling the broad "kernel is under GPL"
expectations.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230304120108.05dd44c5@kernel.org/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230306200457.3903854-1-kuba@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I had a (bright?) idea of introducing the concept of enum-models
to account for all the weird ways families enumerate their messages.
I've never finished it because generating C code for each of them
is pretty daunting. But for languages which can use ID values directly
the support is simple enough, so clean this up a bit.
"unified" model is what I recommend going forward.
"directional" model is what ethtool uses.
"notify-split" is used by the proposed DPLL code, but we can just
make them use "unified", it hasn't been merged :)
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
|
Add schemas for Netlink spec files. As described in the docs
we have 4 "protocols" or compatibility levels, and each one
comes with its own schema, but the more general / legacy
schemas are superset of more modern ones: genetlink is
the smallest followed by genetlink-c and genetlink-legacy.
There is no schema for raw netlink, yet, I haven't found the time..
I don't know enough jsonschema to do inheritance or something
but the repetition is not too bad. I hope.
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
