summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation/pwm.txt (follow)
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* pwm: Add sysfs interfaceH Hartley Sweeten2013-06-211-0/+37
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add a simple sysfs interface to the generic PWM framework. /sys/class/pwm/ `-- pwmchipN/ for each PWM chip |-- export (w/o) ask the kernel to export a PWM channel |-- npwm (r/o) number of PWM channels in this PWM chip |-- pwmX/ for each exported PWM channel | |-- duty_cycle (r/w) duty cycle (in nanoseconds) | |-- enable (r/w) enable/disable PWM | |-- period (r/w) period (in nanoseconds) | `-- polarity (r/w) polarity of PWM (normal/inversed) `-- unexport (w/o) return a PWM channel to the kernel Based on work by Lars Poeschel. Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Cc: Lars Poeschel <poeschel@lemonage.de> Cc: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@gmail.com> Cc: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
* pwm: add devm_pwm_get() and devm_pwm_put()Alexandre Courbot2012-09-101-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | Add resource managed variants of pwm_get() and pwm_put() for convenience. Code is largely inspired by the equivalent devm functions of the regulator framework. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
* pwm: Add table-based lookup for static mappingsThierry Reding2012-06-151-4/+23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In order to get rid of the global namespace for PWM devices, this commit provides an alternative method, similar to that of the regulator or clock frameworks, for registering a static mapping for PWM devices. This works by providing a table with a provider/consumer map in the board setup code. With the new pwm_get() and pwm_put() functions available, usage of pwm_request() and pwm_free() becomes deprecated. Reviewed-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
* pwm: Allow chips to support multiple PWMsThierry Reding2012-06-151-3/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Many PWM controllers provide access to more than a single PWM output and may even share some resource among them. Allowing a PWM chip to provide multiple PWM devices enables better sharing of those resources. As a side-effect this change allows easy integration with the device tree where a given PWM can be looked up based on the PWM chip's phandle and a corresponding index. This commit modifies the PWM core to support multiple PWMs per struct pwm_chip. It achieves this in a similar way to how gpiolib works, by allowing PWM ranges to be requested dynamically (pwm_chip.base == -1) or starting at a given offset (pwm_chip.base >= 0). A chip specifies how many PWMs it controls using the npwm member. Each of the functions in the pwm_ops structure gets an additional argument that specified the PWM number (it can be converted to a per-chip index by subtracting the chip's base). The total maximum number of PWM devices is currently fixed to 1024 while the data is actually stored in a radix tree, thus saving resources if not all of them are used. Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Reviewed-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> [eric@eukrea.com: fix error handling in pwmchip_add] Signed-off-by: Eric BĂ©nard <eric@eukrea.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
* pwm: Add PWM framework supportSascha Hauer2012-06-151-0/+54
This patch adds framework support for PWM (pulse width modulation) devices. The is a barebone PWM API already in the kernel under include/linux/pwm.h, but it does not allow for multiple drivers as each of them implements the pwm_*() functions. There are other PWM framework patches around from Bill Gatliff. Unlike his framework this one does not change the existing API for PWMs so that this framework can act as a drop in replacement for the existing API. Why another framework? Several people argue that there should not be another framework for PWMs but they should be integrated into one of the existing frameworks like led or hwmon. Unlike these frameworks the PWM framework is agnostic to the purpose of the PWM. In fact, a PWM can drive a LED, but this makes the LED framework a user of a PWM, like already done in leds-pwm.c. The gpio framework also is not suitable for PWMs. Every gpio could be turned into a PWM using timer based toggling, but on the other hand not every PWM hardware device can be turned into a gpio due to the lack of hardware capabilities. This patch does not try to improve the PWM API yet, this could be done in subsequent patches. Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Kurt Van Dijck <kurt.van.dijck@eia.be> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias@kaehlcke.net> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Reviewed-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> [thierry.reding@avionic-design.de: fixup typos, kerneldoc comments] Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>