| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This architecture received only generic maintenance since December 2009
when it was originally submitted, and no actual additional support since
then. It has no defconfig entry either, meaning that it was never built
by the ARM KAutobuild. Incidentally it currently doesn't build either
when CONFIG_MACH_NUC932EVB is selected which is the only possible config
choice.
This is therefore dead code and should be removed. If someone wants to
revive this code, it could be retrieved from the Git repository, and
ideally be merged in mach-w90x900/ instead.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Cc: Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since we're now using addruart to establish the debug mapping, we can
remove the io_pg_offst and phys_io members of struct machine_desc.
The various declarations were removed using the following script:
grep -rl MACHINE_START arch/arm | xargs \
sed -i '/MACHINE_START/,/MACHINE_END/ { /\.\(phys_io\|io_pg_offst\)/d }'
[ Initial patch was from Jeremy Kerr, example script from Russell King ]
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao at canonical.com>
|
|
The previous nuc932 support patches have been discarded by me and because it belongs to
another SoCs series named nuc93x,at present, which included nuc931 and nuc932, I think it is
better to create a new mach-nuc93x,So I made the patch,and request your advice.Thanks!
Signed-off-by: Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|