summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/s390/include/asm/stacktrace.h (follow)
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* s390/vdso: Introduce and use struct stack_frame_vdso_wrapperHeiko Carstens2024-05-141-0/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Introduce and use struct stack_frame_vdso_wrapper within vdso user wrapper code. With this structure it is possible to automatically generate an asm-offset define which can be used to save and restore the return address of the calling function. Also use STACK_FRAME_USER_OVERHEAD instead of STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD to document that the code works with user space stack frames with the standard stack frame layout. Fixes: aa44433ac4ee ("s390: add USER_STACKTRACE support") Reviewed-by: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
* s390/stacktrace: Merge perf_callchain_user() and arch_stack_walk_user()Heiko Carstens2024-05-141-0/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | The two functions perf_callchain_user() and arch_stack_walk_user() are nearly identical. Reduce code duplication and add a common helper which can be called by both functions. Fixes: aa44433ac4ee ("s390: add USER_STACKTRACE support") Reviewed-by: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
* s390/switch_to: use generic header fileHeiko Carstens2024-02-121-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Move the switch_to() implementation to process.c and use the generic switch_to.h header file instead, like some other architectures. This addresses also the oddity that the old switch_to() implementation assigns the return value of __switch_to() to 'prev' instead of 'last', like it should. Remove also all includes of switch_to.h from C files, except process.c. Acked-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
* s390/perf: implement perf_callchain_user()Heiko Carstens2023-11-051-0/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Daan De Meyer and Neal Gompa reported that s390 does not support perf user stack unwinding. This was never implemented since this requires user space to be compiled with the -mbackchain compile option, which until now no distribution did. However this is going to change with Fedora. Therefore provide a perf_callchain_user() implementation. Note that due to the way s390 sets up stack frames the provided call chains can contain invalid values. This is especially true for the first stack frame, where it is not possible to tell if the return address has been written to the stack already or not. Reported-by: Daan De Meyer <daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com> Reported-by: Neal Gompa <ngompa@fedoraproject.org> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAO8sHcn3+_qrnvp0580aK7jN0Wion5F7KYeBAa4MnCY4mqABPA@mail.gmail.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231030123558.10816-A-hca@linux.ibm.com Reviewed-by: Neal Gompa <ngompa@fedoraproject.org> Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
* s390/kdump: remove nodat stack restriction for calling nodat functionsAlexander Gordeev2023-04-191-1/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | To allow calling of DAT-off code from kernel the stack needs to be switched to nodat_stack (or other stack mapped as 1:1). Before call_nodat() macro was introduced that was necessary to provide the very same memory address for STNSM and STOSM instructions. If the kernel would stay on a random stack (e.g. a virtually mapped one) then a virtual address provided for STNSM instruction could differ from the physical address needed for the corresponding STOSM instruction. After call_nodat() macro is introduced the kernel stack does not need to be mapped 1:1 anymore, since the macro stores the physical memory address of return PSW in a register before entering DAT-off mode. This way the return LPSWE instruction is able to pick the correct memory location and restore the DAT-on mode. That however might fail in case the 16-byte return PSW happened to cross page boundary: PSW mask and PSW address could end up in two separate non-contiguous physical pages. Align the return PSW on 16-byte boundary so it always fits into a single physical page. As result any stack (including the virtually mapped one) could be used for calling DAT-off code and prior switching to nodat_stack becomes unnecessary. Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
* s390/kdump: rework invocation of DAT-off codeAlexander Gordeev2023-04-191-0/+47
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Calling kdump kernel is a two-step process that involves invocation of the purgatory code: first time - to verify the new kernel checksum and second time - to call the new kernel itself. The purgatory code operates on real addresses and does not expect any memory protection. Therefore, before the purgatory code is entered the DAT mode is always turned off. However, it is only restored upon return from the new kernel checksum verification. In case the purgatory was called to start the new kernel and failed the control is returned to the old kernel, but the DAT mode continues staying off. The new kernel start failure is unlikely and leads to the disabled wait state anyway. Still that poses a risk, since the kernel code in general is not DAT-off safe and even calling the disabled_wait() function might crash. Introduce call_nodat() macro that allows entering DAT-off mode, calling an arbitrary function and restoring DAT mode back on. Switch all invocations of DAT-off code to that macro and avoid the above described scenario altogether. Name the call_nodat() macro in small letters after the already existing call_on_stack() and put it to the same header file. Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> [hca@linux.ibm.com: some small modifications to call_nodat() macro] Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
* s390/stacktrace: remove call_on_stack_noreturn()Heiko Carstens2023-04-041-13/+0
| | | | | | | | There is no user left of call_on_stack_noreturn() - remove it. Reviewed-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
* s390/entry: sort out physical vs virtual pointers usage in sie64aNico Boehr2022-10-261-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Fix virtual vs physical address confusion (which currently are the same). sie_block is accessed in entry.S and passed it to hardware, which is why both its physical and virtual address are needed. To avoid every caller having to do the virtual-physical conversion, add a new function sie64a() which converts the virtual address to physical. Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221020143159.294605-3-nrb@linux.ibm.com Message-Id: <20221020143159.294605-3-nrb@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
* s390/stack: add union to reflect kvm stack slot usagesHeiko Carstens2022-06-011-1/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | Add a union which describes how the empty stack slots are being used by kvm and perf. This should help to avoid another bug like the one which was fixed with commit c9bfb460c3e4 ("s390/perf: obtain sie_block from the right address"). Reviewed-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
* s390/stack: merge empty stack frame slotsHeiko Carstens2022-06-011-2/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | Merge empty1 and empty2 arrays within the stack frame to one single array. This is possible since with commit 42b01a553a56 ("s390: always use the packed stack layout") the alternative stack frame layout is gone. Reviewed-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
* s390: current_stack_pointer shouldn't be a functionSven Schnelle2022-04-121-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | s390 defines current_stack_pointer as function while all other architectures use 'register unsigned long asm("<stackptr reg>"). This make codes like the following from check_stack_object() fail: if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP)) { if ((void *)current_stack_pointer < obj + len) return BAD_STACK; } else { if (obj < (void *)current_stack_pointer) return BAD_STACK; } because this would compare the address of current_stack_pointer() and not the stackpointer value. Reported-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com> Fixes: 2792d84e6da5 ("usercopy: Check valid lifetime via stack depth") Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
* s390: always use the packed stack layoutVasily Gorbik2022-03-011-9/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | -mpacked-stack option has been supported by both minimum gcc and clang versions for a while. With commit e2bc3e91d91e ("scripts/min-tool-version.sh: Raise minimum clang version to 13.0.0 for s390") minimum clang version now also supports a combination of flags -mpacked-stack -mbackchain -pg -mfentry and fulfills all requirements to always enable the packed stack layout. Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
* s390/unwind: use current_frame_address() to unwind current taskVasily Gorbik2021-09-071-10/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | current_stack_pointer() simply returns current value of %r15. If current_stack_pointer() caller allocates stack (which is the case in unwind code) %r15 points to a stack frame allocated for callees, meaning current_stack_pointer() caller (e.g. stack_trace_save) will end up in the stacktrace. This is not expected by stack_trace_save*() callers and causes problems. current_frame_address() on the other hand returns function stack frame address, which matches %r15 upon function invocation. Using it in get_stack_pointer() makes it more aligned with x86 implementation (according to BACKTRACE_SELF_TEST output) and meets stack_trace_save*() caller's expectations, notably KCSAN. Also make sure unwind_start is always inlined. Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Suggested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/patch.git-04dd26be3043.your-ad-here.call-01630504868-ext-6188@work.hours Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
* s390: rename CALL_ON_STACK_NORETURN() to call_on_stack_noreturn()Heiko Carstens2021-07-081-1/+1
| | | | | | | | Lower case matches the call_on_stack() macro and is easier to read. Reviewed-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
* s390: add type checking to CALL_ON_STACK_NORETURN() macroHeiko Carstens2021-07-081-1/+3
| | | | | | | | | Make sure the to be called function takes no arguments (and returns void). Otherwise usage of CALL_ON_STACK_NORETURN() would generate broken code. Reviewed-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
* s390: remove old CALL_ON_STACK() macroHeiko Carstens2021-07-081-37/+0
| | | | | | Reviewed-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
* s390: introduce proper type handling call_on_stack() macroHeiko Carstens2021-07-081-0/+97
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The existing CALL_ON_STACK() macro allows for subtle bugs: - There is no type checking of the function that is being called. That is: missing or too many arguments do not cause any compile error or warning. The same is true if the return type of the called function changes. This can lead to quite random bugs. - Sign and zero extension of arguments is missing. Given that the s390 C ABI requires that the caller of a function performs proper sign and zero extension this can also lead to subtle bugs. - If arguments to the CALL_ON_STACK() macros contain functions calls register corruption can happen due to register asm constructs being used. Therefore introduce a new call_on_stack() macro which is supposed to fix all these problems. Reviewed-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
* s390/stack: fix possible register corruption with stack switch helperHeiko Carstens2021-06-211-7/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The CALL_ON_STACK macro is used to call a C function from inline assembly, and therefore must consider the C ABI, which says that only registers 6-13, and 15 are non-volatile (restored by the called function). The inline assembly incorrectly marks all registers used to pass parameters to the called function as read-only input operands, instead of operands that are read and written to. This might result in register corruption depending on usage, compiler, and compile options. Fix this by marking all operands used to pass parameters as read/write operands. To keep the code simple even register 6, if used, is marked as read-write operand. Fixes: ff340d2472ec ("s390: add stack switch helper") Cc: <stable@kernel.org> # 4.20 Reviewed-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
* s390/unwind: add machine check handler stackVasily Gorbik2021-04-051-0/+1
| | | | | | Fixes: b61b1595124a ("s390: add stack for machine check handler") Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
* s390: fix register clobbering in CALL_ON_STACKVasily Gorbik2019-11-301-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | CALL_ON_STACK defines and initializes register variables. Inline assembly which follows might trigger compiler to generate memory access for "stack" argument (e.g. in case of S390_lowcore.nodat_stack). This memory access produces a function call under kasan with outline instrumentation which clobbers registers. Switch "stack" argument in CALL_ON_STACK helper to use memory reference constraint and perform load instead. Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
* s390/unwind: always inline get_stack_pointerVasily Gorbik2019-11-301-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | Always inline get_stack_pointer() to avoid potential problems due to compiler inlining decisions, i.e. getting stack pointer of get_stack_pointer() itself which is later reused. Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
* s390: avoid misusing CALL_ON_STACK for task stack setupVasily Gorbik2019-11-301-0/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CALL_ON_STACK is intended to be used for temporary stack switching with potential return to the caller. When CALL_ON_STACK is misused to switch from nodat stack to task stack back_chain information would later lead stack unwinder from task stack into (per cpu) nodat stack which is reused for other purposes. This would yield confusing unwinding result or errors. To avoid that introduce CALL_ON_STACK_NORETURN to be used instead. It makes sure that back_chain is zeroed and unwinder finishes gracefully ending up at task pt_regs. Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
* s390: correct CALL_ON_STACK back_chain savingVasily Gorbik2019-11-301-1/+14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently CALL_ON_STACK saves r15 as back_chain in the first stack frame of the stack we about to switch to. But if a function which uses CALL_ON_STACK calls other function it allocates a stack frame for a callee. In this case r15 is pointing to a callee stack frame and not a stack frame of function itself. This results in dummy unwinding entry with random sp and ip values. Introduce and utilize current_frame_address macro to get an address of actual function stack frame. Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
* s390/unwind: unify task is current checksVasily Gorbik2019-11-301-1/+1
| | | | | | | | Avoid mixture of task == NULL and task == current meaning the same thing and simply always initialize task with current in unwind_start. Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
* s390/unwind: fix get_stack_pointer(NULL, NULL)Ilya Leoshkevich2019-10-311-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | unwind_for_each_frame(NULL, NULL, 0) does not return any valid frames. The reason is that get_stack_pointer, unlike get_stack_info and show_stack, does not handle NULL argument. Fix by making get_stack_pointer treat NULL as current, like get_stack_info and show_stack do. Reviewed-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
* s390/unwind: correct stack switching during unwindVasily Gorbik2019-06-071-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | Adjust conditions in on_stack function. That fixes backchain unwinder which was unable to read pt_regs at the very bottom of the stack and hence couldn't follow stacks (e.g. from async stack to a task stack). Fixes: 78c98f907413 ("s390/unwind: introduce stack unwind API") Reported-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
* s390/unwind: introduce stack unwind APIMartin Schwidefsky2019-05-021-0/+114
Rework the dump_trace() stack unwinder interface to support different unwinding algorithms. The new interface looks like this: struct unwind_state state; unwind_for_each_frame(&state, task, regs, start_stack) do_something(state.sp, state.ip, state.reliable); The unwind_bc.c file contains the implementation for the classic back-chain unwinder. One positive side effect of the new code is it now handles ftraced functions gracefully. It prints the real name of the return function instead of 'return_to_handler'. Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>