Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | [PATCH] s390: in_interrupt vs. in_atomic | Martin Schwidefsky | 2005-06-05 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | The condition for no context in do_exception checks for hard and soft interrupts by using in_interrupt() but not for preemption. This is bad for the users of __copy_from/to_user_inatomic because the fault handler might call schedule although the preemption count is != 0. Use in_atomic() instead in_interrupt(). Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> | ||||
* | Linux-2.6.12-rc2v2.6.12-rc2 | Linus Torvalds | 2005-04-17 | 1 | -0/+586 |
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip! |