| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After m68k's task_thread_info() doesn't refer to current,
it's possible to remove sched.h from interrupt.h and not break m68k!
Many thanks to Heiko Carstens for allowing this.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When an aead constructed through crypto_nivaead_default fails
its selftest, we'll loop forever trying to construct new aead
objects but failing because it already exists.
The crux of the issue is that once an aead fails the selftest,
we'll ignore it on the next run through crypto_aead_lookup and
attempt to construct a new aead.
We should instead return an error to the caller if we find an
an that has failed the test.
This bug hasn't manifested itself yet because we don't have any
test vectors for the existing nivaead algorithms. They're tested
through the underlying algorithms only.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds an async field to /proc/crypto for ablkcipher and aead
algorithms.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch makes crypto_alloc_aead always return algorithms that is
capable of generating their own IVs through givencrypt and givdecrypt.
All existing AEAD algorithms already do. New ones must either supply
their own or specify a generic IV generator with the geniv field.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch creates the infrastructure to help the construction of IV
generator templates that wrap around AEAD algorithms by adding an IV
generator to them. This is useful for AEAD algorithms with no built-in
IV generator or to replace their built-in generator.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some algorithms always require manual IV construction. For instance,
the generic CCM algorithm requires the first byte of the IV to be manually
constructed. Such algorithms are always used by other algorithms equipped
with their own IV generators and do not need IV generation per se.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds the underlying givcrypt operations for aead and associated
support elements. The rationale is identical to that of the skcipher
givcrypt operations, i.e., sometimes only the algorithm knows how the
IV should be generated.
A new request type aead_givcrypt_request is added which contains an
embedded aead_request structure with two new elements to support this
operation. The new elements are seq and giv. The seq field should
contain a strictly increasing 64-bit integer which may be used by
certain IV generators as an input value. The giv field will be used
to store the generated IV. It does not need to obey the alignment
requirements of the algorithm because it's not used during the operation.
The existing iv field must still be available as it will be used to store
intermediate IVs and the output IV if chaining is desired.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As it is authsize is an algorithm paramter which cannot be changed at
run-time. This is inconvenient because hardware that implements such
algorithms would have to register each authsize that they support
separately.
Since authsize is a property common to all AEAD algorithms, we can add
a function setauthsize that sets it at run-time, just like setkey.
This patch does exactly that and also changes authenc so that authsize
is no longer a parameter of its template.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
|
This patch adds crypto_aead which is the interface for AEAD
(Authenticated Encryption with Associated Data) algorithms.
AEAD algorithms perform authentication and encryption in one
step. Traditionally users (such as IPsec) would use two
different crypto algorithms to perform these. With AEAD
this comes down to one algorithm and one operation.
Of course if traditional algorithms were used we'd still
be doing two operations underneath. However, real AEAD
algorithms may allow the underlying operations to be
optimised as well.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
