summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/base/power/opp (follow)
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* PM / OPP: Move the OPP directory out of power/Viresh Kumar2017-10-036-3091/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The drivers/base/power/ directory is special and contains code related to power management core like system suspend/resume, hibernation, etc. It was fine to keep the OPP code inside it when we had just one file for it, but it is growing now and already has a directory for itself. Lets move it directly under drivers/ directory, just like cpufreq and cpuidle. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Call notifier without holding opp_table->lockViresh Kumar2017-09-261-0/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The notifier callbacks may want to call some OPP helper routines which may try to take the same opp_table->lock again and cause a deadlock. One such usecase was reported by Chanwoo Choi, where calling dev_pm_opp_disable() leads us to the devfreq's OPP notifier handler, which further calls dev_pm_opp_find_freq_floor() and it deadlocks. We don't really need the opp_table->lock to be held across the notifier call though, all we want to make sure is that the 'opp' doesn't get freed while being used from within the notifier chain. We can do it with help of dev_pm_opp_get/put() as well. Let's do it. Cc: 4.11+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.11+ Fixes: 5b650b388844 "PM / OPP: Take kref from _find_opp_table()" Reported-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> Tested-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Fix get sharing CPUs when hotplug is usedWaldemar Rymarkiewicz2017-08-011-12/+17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We fail dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus() when possible CPU device does not exist. This can happen on platforms where not all possible CPUs are available at start up ie. hotplugged out. The CPU device is not registered in the system so we are not able to check struct device to set the sharing CPUs bitmask properly. Example (real use case): 2 physical MIPS cores, 4 VPE, cpu0/2 run Linux and cpu1/3 are not available for Linux at boot up. cpufreq-dt driver + OPP v2 fail to register opp_table due to the fact there is no struct device for cpu1 (remains offline at bootup). To solve the bug, stop using device struct to check device_node. Instead get CPU device_node directly from device tree with of_get_cpu_node(). Signed-off-by: Waldemar Rymarkiewicz <waldemarx.rymarkiewicz@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: OF: Use pr_debug() instead of pr_err() while adding OPP tableViresh Kumar2017-07-161-2/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Some platforms add the OPPs dynamically from platform specific drivers instead of getting them statically from DT. The cpufreq-dt driver already ignores the return value of dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table() to not error out for such cases, but we still end up printing error message from that routine. That's not nice. Convert the print message to use pr_debug() instead. Reported-by: Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_{set|put}_clkname()Viresh Kumar2017-06-241-0/+67
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In order to support OPP switching, OPP layer needs to get pointer to the clock for the device. Simple cases work fine without using the routines added by this patch (i.e. by passing connection-id as NULL), but for a device with multiple clocks available, the OPP core needs to know the exact name of the clk to use. Add a new set of APIs to get that done. Tested-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Don't create debugfs "supply-0" directory unnecessarilyViresh Kumar2017-06-221-4/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | We create "supply-0" debugfs directory even if the device doesn't do voltage scaling. That looks confusing, as if the regulator is found but we never managed to get voltage levels for it. Avoid creating such a directory unnecessarily. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: opp-microvolt is not optional if regulators are setViresh Kumar2017-06-221-2/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | If dev_pm_opp_set_regulators() is called for a device and its regulators are set in the OPP core, the OPP nodes for the device must contain the "opp-microvolt" property, otherwise there is something wrong and we better error out. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Don't create copy of regulators unnecessarilyViresh Kumar2017-06-221-11/+3
| | | | | | | | | This code was required while the OPP core was managed with help of RCUs, but not anymore. Get rid of unnecessary alloc/memcpy operations. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Reorganize _generic_set_opp_regulator()Viresh Kumar2017-06-221-39/+34
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The code was overly complicated here because of the limitations that we had with RCUs (Couldn't use opp-table and OPPs outside RCU protected section and can't call sleep-able routines from within that). But that is long gone now. Reorganize _generic_set_opp_regulator() in order to avoid using "struct dev_pm_set_opp_data" and copying data into it for the case where opp_table->set_opp is not set. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: fix off-by-one bug in dev_pm_opp_get_max_volt_latency loopAndrzej Hajda2017-02-231-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | Reading array at given index before checking if index is valid results in illegal memory access. The bug was detected using KASAN framework. Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Expose _of_get_opp_desc_node as dev_pm_opp APIDave Gerlach2017-02-091-4/+5
| | | | | | | | | | Rename _of_get_opp_desc_node to dev_pm_opp_of_get_opp_desc_node and add it to include/linux/pm_opp.h to allow other drivers, such as platform OPP and cpufreq drivers, to make use of it. Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Make _find_opp_table_unlocked() staticWei Yongjun2017-02-071-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | Fixes the following sparse warning: drivers/base/power/opp/core.c:49:18: warning: symbol '_find_opp_table_unlocked' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Simplify dev_pm_opp_get_max_volt_latency()Viresh Kumar2017-01-301-25/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | dev_pm_opp_get_max_volt_latency() calls _find_opp_table() two times effectively. Merge _get_regulator_count() into dev_pm_opp_get_max_volt_latency() to avoid that. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Simplify _opp_set_availability()Viresh Kumar2017-01-301-22/+5
| | | | | | | | | As we don't use RCU locking anymore, there is no need to replace an earlier OPP node with a new one. Just update the existing one. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Move away from RCU lockingViresh Kumar2017-01-304-294/+80
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The RCU locking isn't well suited for the OPP core. The RCU locking fits better for reader heavy stuff, while the OPP core have at max one or two readers only at a time. Over that, it was getting very confusing the way RCU locking was used with the OPP core. The individual OPPs are mostly well handled, i.e. for an update a new structure was created and then that replaced the older one. But the OPP tables were updated directly all the time from various parts of the core. Though they were mostly used from within RCU locked region, they didn't had much to do with RCU and were governed by the mutex instead. And that mixed with the 'opp_table_lock' has made the core even more confusing. Now that we are already managing the OPPs and the OPP tables with kernel reference infrastructure, we can get rid of RCU locking completely and simplify the code a lot. Remove all RCU references from code and comments. Acquire opp_table->lock while parsing the list of OPPs though. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Take kref from _find_opp_table()Viresh Kumar2017-01-302-122/+95
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Take reference of the OPP table from within _find_opp_table(). Also update the callers of _find_opp_table() to call dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table() after they have used the OPP table. Note that _find_opp_table() increments the reference under the opp_table_lock. Now that the OPP table wouldn't get freed until the callers of _find_opp_table() call dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(), there is no need to take the opp_table_lock or rcu_read_lock() around it. Drop them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Update OPP users to put referenceViresh Kumar2017-01-302-67/+69
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch updates dev_pm_opp_find_freq_*() routines to get a reference to the OPPs returned by them. Also updates the users of dev_pm_opp_find_freq_*() routines to call dev_pm_opp_put() after they are done using the OPPs. As it is guaranteed the that OPPs wouldn't get freed while being used, the RCU read side locking present with the users isn't required anymore. Drop it as well. This patch also updates all users of devfreq_recommended_opp() which was returning an OPP received from the OPP core. Note that some of the OPP core routines have gained rcu_read_{lock|unlock}() calls, as those still use RCU specific APIs within them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> [Devfreq] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Add 'struct kref' to struct dev_pm_oppViresh Kumar2017-01-302-15/+15
| | | | | | | | | | Add kref to struct dev_pm_opp for easier accounting of the OPPs. Note that the OPPs are freed under the opp_table->lock mutex only. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() instead of _add_opp_table()Viresh Kumar2017-01-303-89/+29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Migrate all users of _add_opp_table() to use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to guarantee that the OPP table doesn't get freed while being used. Also update _managed_opp() to get the reference to the OPP table. Now that the OPP table wouldn't get freed while these routines are executing after dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() is called, there is no need to take opp_table_lock. Drop them as well. Now that _add_opp_table(), _remove_opp_table() and the unlocked release routines aren't used anymore, remove them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Take reference of the OPP table while adding/removing OPPsViresh Kumar2017-01-301-5/+4
| | | | | | | | | Take reference of the OPP table while adding and removing OPPs, that helps us remove special checks in _remove_opp_table(). Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Return opp_table from dev_pm_opp_set_*() routinesViresh Kumar2017-01-301-193/+50
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Now that we have proper kernel reference infrastructure in place for OPP tables, use it to guarantee that the OPP table isn't freed while being used by the callers of dev_pm_opp_set_*() APIs. Make them all return the pointer to the OPP table after taking its reference and put the reference back with dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs. Now that the OPP table wouldn't get freed while these routines are executing after dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() is called, there is no need to take opp_table_lock. Drop them as well. Remove the rcu specific comments from these routines as they aren't relevant anymore. Note that prototypes of dev_pm_opp_{set|put}_regulators() were already updated by another patch. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Add 'struct kref' to OPP tableViresh Kumar2017-01-302-2/+52
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add kref to struct opp_table for easier accounting of the OPP table. Note that the new routine dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() takes the reference from under the opp_table_lock, which guarantees that the OPP table doesn't get freed unless dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table() is called for the OPP table. Two separate release mechanisms are added: locked and unlocked. In unlocked version the routines aren't required to take/drop opp_table_lock as the callers have already done that. This is required to avoid breaking git bisect, otherwise we may get lockdeps between commits. Once all the users of OPP table are updated the unlocked version shall be removed. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Add per OPP table mutexViresh Kumar2017-01-302-4/+29
| | | | | | | | | | | | Add per OPP table lock to protect opp_table->opp_list. Note that at few places opp_list is used under the rcu_read_lock() and so a mutex can't be added there for now. This will be fixed by a later patch. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Split out part of _add_opp_table() and _remove_opp_table()Viresh Kumar2017-01-271-32/+44
| | | | | | | | | | | Split out parts of _add_opp_table() and _remove_opp_table() into separate routines. This improves readability as well. Should result in no functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Don't expose srcu_head to register notifiersViresh Kumar2017-01-271-16/+50
| | | | | | | | | | Let the OPP core provide helpers to register notifiers for any device, instead of exposing srcu_head outside of the core. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Rename dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() and return OPP rateViresh Kumar2017-01-271-14/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | There is only one user of dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() and that uses it to get the OPP rate for the suspend_opp. Rename dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() as dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp_freq() and return the rate directly from it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Don't allocate OPP table from _opp_allocate()Viresh Kumar2017-01-273-73/+78
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There is no point in trying to find/allocate the table for every OPP that is added for a device. It would be far more efficient to allocate the table only once and pass its pointer to the routines that add the OPP entry. Locking is removed from _opp_add_static_v2() and _opp_add_v1() now as the callers call them with that lock already held. Call to _remove_opp_table() routine is also removed from _opp_free() now, as opp_table isn't allocated from within _opp_allocate(). This is handled by the routines which created the OPP table in the first place. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Rename and split _dev_pm_opp_remove_table()Viresh Kumar2017-01-273-15/+24
| | | | | | | | | | | | Later patches would want to remove OPP table (and its OPPs) using the opp_table pointer instead of 'dev'. In order to prepare for that, rename _dev_pm_opp_remove_table() as _dev_pm_opp_find_and_remove_table() split out part of it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Add light weight _opp_free() routineViresh Kumar2017-01-273-11/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The OPPs which are never successfully added using _opp_add() are not required to be freed with the _opp_remove() routine, as a simple kfree() is enough for them. Introduce a new light weight routine _opp_free(), which will do that. That also helps us removing the 'notify' parameter to _opp_remove(), which isn't required anymore. Note that _opp_free() contains a call to _remove_opp_table() as the OPP table might have been added for this very OPP only. The _remove_opp_table() routine returns quickly if there are more OPPs in the table. This will be simplified in later patches though. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Error out on failing to add static OPPs for v1 bindingsViresh Kumar2017-01-271-4/+8
| | | | | | | | | The code adding static OPPs for V2 bindings already does so. Make the V1 bindings specific code behave the same. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Rename _allocate_opp() to _opp_allocate()Viresh Kumar2017-01-273-4/+4
| | | | | | | | Make the naming consistent with how other routines are named. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Remove useless TODOViresh Kumar2017-01-271-2/+0
| | | | | | | | | This TODO doesn't make sense anymore as we have all the information in a single OPP table. Remove it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Fix memory leak while adding duplicate OPPsViresh Kumar2017-01-272-3/+21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There are two types of duplicate OPPs that get different behavior from the core: A) An earlier OPP is marked 'available' and has same freq/voltages as the new one. B) An earlier OPP with same frequency, but is marked 'unavailable' OR doesn't have same voltages as the new one. The OPP core returns 0 for the first one, but -EEXIST for the second. While the OPP core returns 0 for the first case, its callers don't free the newly allocated OPP structure which isn't used anymore. Fix that by returning -EBUSY instead of 0, but make the callers return 0 eventually. As this isn't a critical fix, its not getting marked for stable kernel. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Don't WARN on multiple calls to dev_pm_opp_set_regulators()Viresh Kumar2016-12-061-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | If a platform specific OPP driver has called this routine first and set the regulators, then the second call from cpufreq-dt driver will hit the WARN_ON(). Remove the WARN_ON(), but continue to return error in such cases. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Allow platform specific custom set_opp() callbacksViresh Kumar2016-12-062-1/+115
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The generic set_opp() handler isn't sufficient for platforms with complex DVFS. For example, some TI platforms have multiple regulators for a CPU device. The order in which various supplies need to be programmed is only known to the platform code and its best to leave it to it. This patch implements APIs to register platform specific set_opp() callback. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Separate out _generic_set_opp()Viresh Kumar2016-12-062-53/+131
| | | | | | | | | | | Later patches would add support for custom set_opp() callbacks. This patch separates out the code for _generic_set_opp() handler in order to prepare for that. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Add infrastructure to manage multiple regulatorsViresh Kumar2016-12-064-120/+293
| | | | | | | | | | | | This patch adds infrastructure to manage multiple regulators and updates the only user (cpufreq-dt) of dev_pm_opp_set{put}_regulator(). This is preparatory work for adding full support for devices with multiple regulators. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Pass struct dev_pm_opp_supply to _set_opp_voltage()Viresh Kumar2016-12-061-27/+17
| | | | | | | | | Pass the entire supply structure instead of all of its fields. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Manage supply's voltage/current in a separate structureViresh Kumar2016-12-064-42/+39
| | | | | | | | | | This is a preparatory step for multiple regulator per device support. Move the voltage/current variables to a new structure. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Don't use OPP structure outside of rcu protected sectionViresh Kumar2016-12-061-3/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | The OPP structure must not be used out of the rcu protected section. Cache the values to be used in separate variables instead. Cc: 4.6+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.6+ Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Pass opp_table to dev_pm_opp_put_regulator()Stephen Boyd2016-11-301-16/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Joonyoung Shim reported an interesting problem on his ARM octa-core Odoroid-XU3 platform. During system suspend, dev_pm_opp_put_regulator() was failing for a struct device for which dev_pm_opp_set_regulator() is called earlier. This happened because an earlier call to dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table() function (from cpufreq-dt.c file) removed all the entries from opp_table->dev_list apart from the last CPU device in the cpumask of CPUs sharing the OPP. But both dev_pm_opp_set_regulator() and dev_pm_opp_put_regulator() routines get CPU device for the first CPU in the cpumask. And so the OPP core failed to find the OPP table for the struct device. This patch attempts to fix this problem by returning a pointer to the opp_table from dev_pm_opp_set_regulator() and using that as the parameter to dev_pm_opp_put_regulator(). This ensures that the dev_pm_opp_put_regulator() doesn't fail to find the opp table. Note that similar design problem also exists with other dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs, but those aren't used currently by anyone and so we don't need to update them for now. Cc: 4.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.4+ Reported-by: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [ Viresh: Wrote commit log and tested on exynos 5250 ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: fix debug/error messages in dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus()Masahiro Yamada2016-10-211-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | These log messages are wrong because _of_get_opp_desc_node() returns an operating-points-v2 node. Commit a6eed752f5fb ("PM / OPP: passing NULL to PTR_ERR()") fixed static checker warnings, and reworded the messages at the same time (but the latter was not mentioned in the git-log). Restore the correct messages. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: make _of_get_opp_desc_node() a static functionMasahiro Yamada2016-10-212-2/+1
| | | | | | | | | | Since commit f47b72a15a96 ("PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file"), this function is defined and called only in drivers/base/power/opp/of.c . Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Don't support OPP if it provides supported-hw but platform does notDave Gerlach2016-09-261-2/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The OPP framework allows each OPP to set a opp-supported-hw property which provides values that are matched against supported_hw values provided by the platform to limit support for certain OPPs on specific hardware. Currently, if the platform does not set supported_hw values, all OPPs are interpreted as supported, even if they have provided their own opp-supported-hw values. If an OPP has provided opp-supported-hw, it is indicating that there is some specific hardware configuration it is supported by. These constraints should be honored, and if no supported_hw has been provided by the platform, there is no way to determine if that OPP is actually supported, so it should be marked as not supported. Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: avoid maybe-uninitialized warningArnd Bergmann2016-09-171-7/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING is set and we are building with -Wmaybe-uninitialized enabled, we can get a warning for the opp core driver: drivers/base/power/opp/core.c: In function 'dev_pm_opp_set_rate': drivers/base/power/opp/core.c:560:8: warning: 'ou_volt_min' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] This has only now appeared as a result of commit 797da5598f3a ("PM / devfreq: Add COMPILE_TEST for build coverage"), which makes the driver visible in some configurations that didn't have it before. The warning is a false positive that I got with gcc-6.1.1, but there is a simple workaround in removing the local variables that we get warnings for (all three are affected depending on the configuration). This also makes the code easier to read. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: optimize dev_pm_opp_set_rate() performance a bitJisheng Zhang2016-07-281-12/+19
| | | | | | | | | | | | In dev_pm_opp_set_rate(), _find_opp_table() is called 4 times: once by _get_opp_clk(), once by dev_pm_opp_set_rate() itself, and twice by dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(). If there are several opp_tables in the system, three times of opp table finding is a big waste. This patch reduced the call of _find_opp_table() to twice. Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / OPP: Add 'UNKNOWN' status for shared_opp in struct opp_tableViresh Kumar2016-06-163-6/+24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() returns 0 even in the case when the OPP core doesn't know whether or not the table is shared. It works on the majority of platforms, where the OPP table is never created before invoking the function and then -ENODEV is returned by it. But in the case of one platform (Jetson TK1) at least, the situation is a bit different. The OPP table has been created (somehow) before dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() is called and it returns 0. Its caller treats that as 'the CPUs don't share OPPs' and that leads to degraded performance. Fix this by converting 'shared_opp' in struct opp_table to an enum and making dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() return -EINVAL in case when the value of that field is "access unknown", so that the caller can handle it accordingly (cpufreq-dt considers that as 'all CPUs share the table', for example). Fixes: 6f707daa3833 "PM / OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus()" Reported-and-tested-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [ rjw : Subject & changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* Merge back new material for v4.7.Rafael J. Wysocki2016-05-065-521/+724
|\
| * PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate fileViresh Kumar2016-05-065-579/+618
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
| * PM / OPP: add non-OF versions of dev_pm_opp_{cpumask_, }remove_tableSudeep Holla2016-05-052-30/+88
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Functions dev_pm_opp_of_{cpumask_,}remove_table removes/frees all the static OPP entries associated with the device and/or all cpus(in case of cpumask) that are created from DT. However the OPP entries are populated reading from the firmware or some different method using dev_pm_opp_add are marked dynamic and can't be removed using above functions. This patch adds non DT/OF versions of dev_pm_opp_{cpumask_,}remove_table to support the above mentioned usecase. This is in preparation to make use of the same in scpi-cpufreq.c Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>