| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The K210 mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-15-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The K210 ACLK clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-14-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The K210 PLL clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-13-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The K210 clock driver depends on SOC_CANAAN, which is only selectable
when !MMU on RISC-V. !MMU is not possible on 32-bit yet, but patches
have been sent for its enabling. The kernel test robot reported this
implicit 64-bit division there.
Replace the implicit division with an explicit one.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/202301201538.zNlqgE4L-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Taube <Mr.Bossman075@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301002657.352637-2-Mr.Bossman075@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In k210_clk_set_parent(), add missing writel() call to update the mux
register of a clock to change its parent. This also fixes a compilation
warning with clang when compiling with W=1.
Fixes: c6ca7616f7d5 ("clk: Add RISC-V Canaan Kendryte K210 clock driver")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210622064502.14841-1-damien.lemoal@wdc.com
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
|
|
|
Add a clock provider driver for the Canaan Kendryte K210 RISC-V SoC.
This new driver with the compatible string "canaan,k210-clk" implements
support for the full clock structure of the K210 SoC. Since it is
required for the correct operation of the SoC, this driver is
selected by default for compilation when the SOC_CANAAN option is
selected.
With this change, the k210-sysctl driver is turned into a simple
platform driver which enables its power bus clock and triggers
populating its child nodes. The sysctl driver retains the SOC early
initialization code, but the implementation now relies on the new
function k210_clk_early_init() provided by the new clk-k210 driver.
The clock structure implemented and many of the coding ideas for the
driver come from the work by Sean Anderson on the K210 support for the
U-Boot project.
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
|
