summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/cxl (follow)
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* cxl/mem: Fix memory device capacity probingDan Williams2021-04-171-2/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | The CXL Identify Memory Device output payload emits capacity in 256MB units. The driver is treating the capacity field as bytes. This was missed because QEMU reports bytes when it should report bytes / 256MB. Fixes: 8adaf747c9f0 ("cxl/mem: Find device capabilities") Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161862021044.3259705.7008520073059739760.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
* cxl/mem: Fix register block offset calculationBen Widawsky2021-04-161-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The "Register Offset Low" register of a "DVSEC Register Locator" contains the 64K aligned offset for the registers along with the BAR indicator and an id. The implementation was treating the "Register Block Offset Low" field a value rather than as a pre-aligned component of the 64-bit offset. So, just mask, don't mask and shift (FIELD_GET). The user visible result of this bug is that the driver fails to bind to the device after none of the required blocks are found. This was missed earlier because the primary development done in the QEMU environment only uses 0 offsets, i.e. 0 shifted is still 0. Fixes: 8adaf747c9f0 ("cxl/mem: Find device capabilities") Reported-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210415232610.603273-1-ben.widawsky@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
* cxl/mem: Force array size of mem_commands[] to CXL_MEM_COMMAND_ID_MAXRobert Richter2021-04-061-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Typically the mem_commands[] array is in sync with 'enum { CXL_CMDS }'. Current code works well. However, the array size of mem_commands[] may not strictly be the same as CXL_MEM_COMMAND_ID_MAX. E.g. if a new CXL_CMD() is added that is guarded by #ifdefs, the array could be shorter. This could lead then further to an out-of-bounds array access in cxl_validate_cmd_from_user(). Fix this by forcing the array size to CXL_MEM_COMMAND_ID_MAX. This also adds range checks for array items in mem_commands[] at compile time. Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210324141635.22335-1-rrichter@amd.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
* cxl/mem: Disable cxl device power managementDan Williams2021-04-061-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | There is no power management of cxl virtual devices, disable device-power-management and runtime-power-management to prevent userspace from growing expectations of those attributes appearing. They can be added back in the future if needed. Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161728761025.2474381.808344500111924819.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
* cxl/mem: Do not rely on device_add() side effects for dev_set_name() failuresDan Williams2021-04-061-10/+29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | While device_add() will happen to catch dev_set_name() failures it is a broken pattern to follow given that the core may try to fall back to a different name. Add explicit checking for dev_set_name() failures to be cleaned up by put_device(). Skip cdev_device_add() and proceed directly to put_device() if the name set fails. This type of bug is easier to see if 'alloc' is split from 'add' operations that require put_device() on failure. So cxl_memdev_alloc() is split out as a result. Fixes: b39cb1052a5c ("cxl/mem: Register CXL memX devices") Reported-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161728760514.2474381.1163928273337158134.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
* cxl/mem: Fix synchronization mechanism for device removal vs ioctl operationsDan Williams2021-04-061-47/+50
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The percpu_ref to gate whether cxl_memdev_ioctl() is free to use the driver context (@cxlm) to issue I/O is overkill, implemented incorrectly (missing a device reference before accessing the percpu_ref), and the complexities of shutting down a percpu_ref contributed to a bug in the error unwind in cxl_mem_add_memdev() (missing put_device() to be fixed separately). Use an rwsem to explicitly synchronize the usage of cxlmd->cxlm, and add the missing reference counting for cxlmd in cxl_memdev_open() and cxl_memdev_release_file(). Fixes: b39cb1052a5c ("cxl/mem: Register CXL memX devices") Reported-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161728759948.2474381.17481500816783671817.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
* cxl/mem: Use sysfs_emit() for attribute show routinesDan Williams2021-04-061-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | While none the CXL sysfs attributes are threatening to overrun a PAGE_SIZE of output, it is good form to use the recommended helpers. Fixes: b39cb1052a5c ("cxl/mem: Register CXL memX devices") Reported-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161728759424.2474381.11231441014951343463.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
* cxl/mem: Fix potential memory leakBen Widawsky2021-02-221-1/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When submitting a command for userspace, input and output payload bounce buffers are allocated. For a given command, both input and output buffers may exist and so when allocation of the input buffer fails, the output buffer must be freed too. As far as I can tell, userspace can't easily exploit the leak to OOM a machine unless the machine was already near OOM state. Fixes: 583fa5e71cae ("cxl/mem: Add basic IOCTL interface") Reported-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210221035846.680145-1-ben.widawsky@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
* cxl/mem: Return -EFAULT if copy_to_user() failsDan Carpenter2021-02-191-1/+4
| | | | | | | | | | The copy_to_user() function returns the number of bytes remaining to be copied, but we want to return -EFAULT if the copy doesn't complete. Fixes: b754ffbbc0ee ("cxl/mem: Add basic IOCTL interface") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YC+K3kgzqm20zCWY@mwanda Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
* cxl/mem: Add set of informational commandsBen Widawsky2021-02-171-0/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | Add initial set of formal commands beyond basic identify and command enumeration. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> (v2) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210217040958.1354670-8-ben.widawsky@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
* cxl/mem: Enable commands via CELBen Widawsky2021-02-172-7/+218
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CXL devices identified by the memory-device class code must implement the Device Command Interface (described in 8.2.9 of the CXL 2.0 spec). While the driver already maintains a list of commands it supports, there is still a need to be able to distinguish between commands that the driver knows about from commands that are optionally supported by the hardware. The Command Effects Log (CEL) is specified in the CXL 2.0 specification. The CEL is one of two types of logs, the other being vendor specific. They are distinguished in hardware/spec via UUID. The CEL is useful for 2 things: 1. Determine which optional commands are supported by the CXL device. 2. Enumerate any vendor specific commands The CEL is used by the driver to determine which commands are available in the hardware and therefore which commands userspace is allowed to execute. The set of enabled commands might be a subset of commands which are advertised in UAPI via CXL_MEM_SEND_COMMAND IOCTL. With the CEL enabling comes a internal flag to indicate a base set of commands that are enabled regardless of CEL. Such commands are required for basic interaction with the hardware and thus can be useful in debug cases, for example if the CEL is corrupted. The implementation leaves the statically defined table of commands and supplements it with a bitmap to determine commands that are enabled. This organization was chosen for the following reasons: - Smaller memory footprint. Doesn't need a table per device. - Reduce memory allocation complexity. - Fixed command IDs to opcode mapping for all devices makes development and debugging easier. - Certain helpers are easily achievable, like cxl_for_each_cmd(). Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> (v2) Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> (v3) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210217040958.1354670-7-ben.widawsky@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
* cxl/mem: Add a "RAW" send commandBen Widawsky2021-02-172-0/+150
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The CXL memory device send interface will have a number of supported commands. The raw command is not such a command. Raw commands allow userspace to send a specified opcode to the underlying hardware and bypass all driver checks on the command. The primary use for this command is to [begrudgingly] allow undocumented vendor specific hardware commands. While not the main motivation, it also allows prototyping new hardware commands without a driver patch and rebuild. While this all sounds very powerful it comes with a couple of caveats: 1. Bug reports using raw commands will not get the same level of attention as bug reports using supported commands (via taint). 2. Supported commands will be rejected by the RAW command. With this comes new debugfs knob to allow full access to your toes with your weapon of choice. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> (v2) Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Cc: Ariel Sibley <Ariel.Sibley@microchip.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210217040958.1354670-6-ben.widawsky@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
* cxl/mem: Add basic IOCTL interfaceBen Widawsky2021-02-171-1/+282
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add a straightforward IOCTL that provides a mechanism for userspace to query the supported memory device commands. CXL commands as they appear to userspace are described as part of the UAPI kerneldoc. The command list returned via this IOCTL will contain the full set of commands that the driver supports, however, some of those commands may not be available for use by userspace. Memory device commands first appear in the CXL 2.0 specification. They are submitted through a mailbox mechanism specified in the CXL 2.0 specification. The send command allows userspace to issue mailbox commands directly to the hardware. The list of available commands to send are the output of the query command. The driver verifies basic properties of the command and possibly inspect the input (or output) payload to determine whether or not the command is allowed (or might taint the kernel). Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> # bug in earlier revision Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> (v2) Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210217040958.1354670-5-ben.widawsky@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
* cxl/mem: Register CXL memX devicesDan Williams2021-02-174-2/+318
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Create the /sys/bus/cxl hierarchy to enumerate: * Memory Devices (per-endpoint control devices) * Memory Address Space Devices (platform address ranges with interleaving, performance, and persistence attributes) * Memory Regions (active provisioned memory from an address space device that is in use as System RAM or delegated to libnvdimm as Persistent Memory regions). For now, only the per-endpoint control devices are registered on the 'cxl' bus. However, going forward it will provide a mechanism to coordinate cross-device interleave. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> (v2) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210217040958.1354670-4-ben.widawsky@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
* cxl/mem: Find device capabilitiesBen Widawsky2021-02-173-2/+679
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Provide enough functionality to utilize the mailbox of a memory device. The mailbox is used to interact with the firmware running on the memory device. The flow is proven with one implemented command, "identify". Because the class code has already told the driver this is a memory device and the identify command is mandatory. CXL devices contain an array of capabilities that describe the interactions software can have with the device or firmware running on the device. A CXL compliant device must implement the device status and the mailbox capability. Additionally, a CXL compliant memory device must implement the memory device capability. Each of the capabilities can [will] provide an offset within the MMIO region for interacting with the CXL device. The capabilities tell the driver how to find and map the register space for CXL Memory Devices. The registers are required to utilize the CXL spec defined mailbox interface. The spec outlines two mailboxes, primary and secondary. The secondary mailbox is earmarked for system firmware, and not handled in this driver. Primary mailboxes are capable of generating an interrupt when submitting a background command. That implementation is saved for a later time. Reported-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> (coverity) Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> (smatch) Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> (v2) Link: https://www.computeexpresslink.org/download-the-specification Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210217040958.1354670-3-ben.widawsky@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
* cxl/mem: Introduce a driver for CXL-2.0-Type-3 endpointsDan Williams2021-02-174-0/+118
The CXL.mem protocol allows a device to act as a provider of "System RAM" and/or "Persistent Memory" that is fully coherent as if the memory was attached to the typical CPU memory controller. With the CXL-2.0 specification a PCI endpoint can implement a "Type-3" device interface and give the operating system control over "Host Managed Device Memory". See section 2.3 Type 3 CXL Device. The memory range exported by the device may optionally be described by the platform firmware memory map, or by infrastructure like LIBNVDIMM to provision persistent memory capacity from one, or more, CXL.mem devices. A pre-requisite for Linux-managed memory-capacity provisioning is this cxl_mem driver that can speak the mailbox protocol defined in section 8.2.8.4 Mailbox Registers. For now just land the initial driver boiler-plate and Documentation/ infrastructure. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> (v1) Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Link: https://www.computeexpresslink.org/download-the-specification Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210217040958.1354670-2-ben.widawsky@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>