summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/pci/setup-irq.c (follow)
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* PCI: use dev_printk when possibleBjorn Helgaas2008-06-261-2/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Convert printks to use dev_printk(). I converted pr_debug() to dev_dbg(). Both use KERN_DEBUG and are enabled only when DEBUG is defined. I converted printk(KERN_DEBUG) to dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG), not to dev_dbg(), because dev_dbg() is only enabled when DEBUG is defined. I converted DBG(KERN_INFO) (only in setup-bus.c) to dev_info(). The DBG() name makes it sound like debug, but it's been enabled forever, so dev_info() preserves the previous behavior. I tried to make the resource assignment formats more consistent, e.g., "BAR %d: got res [%#llx-%#llx] bus [%#llx-%#llx] flags %#lx\n" instead of sometimes using "start-end" and sometimes using "size@start". I'm not attached to one or the other; I'd just like them consistent. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
* kobjects: fix up improper use of the kobject name fieldGreg Kroah-Hartman2007-10-121-1/+1
| | | | | | | A number of different drivers incorrect access the kobject name field directly. This is not correct as the name might not be in the array. Use the proper accessor function instead.
* PCI: PCI devices get assigned redundant IRQsAndreas Block2007-02-171-8/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I'm currently working on a port to a CPCI board with a MPC5200. When testing the PCI interrupt routing, I discovered the following: Even devices which don't use interrupts (-> PCI Spec.: Interrupt Pin Register is zero), get an interrupt assigned (this is at least true for most of the PPC-targets I looked at). The cause is pretty obvious in drivers/pci/setup-irq.c. I guess at least in an ideal world with correctly designed hardware, the code should rather look as in the patch below. Of course it doesn't hurt anybody to have an unuseable IRQ assigned to a PCI-to-PCI-bridge (or something alike), but to me it seems a bit strange. Please correct me, if I'm mislead. The patch below is tested on the above mentioned CPCI-MPC5200 board and is compiler tested with the latest git-repository kernel on x86. Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
* Linux-2.6.12-rc2v2.6.12-rc2Linus Torvalds2005-04-171-0/+64
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!