summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/platform/x86/asus_acpi.c (follow)
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* asus_acpi: convert to seq_fileAlexey Dobriyan2009-12-241-127/+194
| | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net> Cc: Karol Kozimor <sziwan@users.sourceforge.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* asus-acpi: set acpi_driver.ownerAlan Jenkins2009-12-091-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | The owner field provides the link between drivers and modules in sysfs, but no ACPI driver was setting it. After setting the owner field, we can see which module provides which driver and vice versa by looking at /sys/bus/acpi/driver/*/module and /sys/module/*/drivers/acpi:*. Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* asus-acpi: Remove uneccesary acpi_disabled checksAlan Jenkins2009-12-091-8/+4
| | | | | | | | acpi_bus_register_driver() already checks acpi_disabled, so acpi bus drivers don't need to. Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* asus-acpi: Remove redundant NULL checksAlan Jenkins2009-12-091-6/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The acpi device callbacks add, start, remove, suspend and resume can never be called with a NULL acpi_device. Each callsite in acpi/scan.c has to dereference the device in order to get the ops structure, e.g. struct acpi_device *acpi_dev = to_acpi_device(dev); struct acpi_driver *acpi_drv = acpi_dev->driver; if (acpi_drv && acpi_drv->ops.suspend) return acpi_drv->ops.suspend(acpi_dev, state); Remove all checks for acpi_dev == NULL within these callbacks. Also remove the checks for acpi_driver_data(acpi_dev) == NULL. None of these checks could fail unless the driver does something strange (which none of them do), the acpi core did something terribly wrong, or we have a memory corruption issue. If this does happen then it's best to dereference the pointer and crash noisily. Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI: asus-acpi: use .notify method instead of installing handler directlyBjorn Helgaas2009-06-181-17/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch adds a .notify() method. The presence of .notify() causes Linux/ACPI to manage event handlers and notify handlers on our behalf, so we don't have to install and remove them ourselves. This driver relies on seeing system notify events, not device-specific ones (because it used ACPI_SYSTEM_NOTIFY). We use the ACPI_DRIVER_ALL_NOTIFY_EVENTS driver flag to request all events, then just ignore any device events we get. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> CC: Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net> CC: Karol Kozimor <sziwan@users.sourceforge.net> CC: acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* proc 2/2: remove struct proc_dir_entry::ownerAlexey Dobriyan2009-03-301-3/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Setting ->owner as done currently (pde->owner = THIS_MODULE) is racy as correctly noted at bug #12454. Someone can lookup entry with NULL ->owner, thus not pinning enything, and release it later resulting in module refcount underflow. We can keep ->owner and supply it at registration time like ->proc_fops and ->data. But this leaves ->owner as easy-manipulative field (just one C assignment) and somebody will forget to unpin previous/pin current module when switching ->owner. ->proc_fops is declared as "const" which should give some thoughts. ->read_proc/->write_proc were just fixed to not require ->owner for protection. rmmod'ed directories will be empty and return "." and ".." -- no harm. And directories with tricky enough readdir and lookup shouldn't be modular. We definitely don't want such modular code. Removing ->owner will also make PDE smaller. So, let's nuke it. Kudos to Jeff Layton for reminding about this, let's say, oversight. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12454 Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
* asus_acpi: Add R1F supportCorentin Chary2009-01-201-1/+15
| | | | | | | Add R1F support Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI: move wmi, asus_acpi, toshiba_acpi to drivers/platform/x86Len Brown2008-12-191-0/+1460
These are platform specific drivers that happen to use ACPI, while drivers/acpi/ is for code that implements ACPI itself. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>