| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
the free software foundation either version 2 of the license
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-only
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 24 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Winslow <swinslow@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190528170026.162703968@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Regarding the .request case: The consumer might be interested in taking
over the configured state from the boot loader. So the initially
configured state should be retained.
For the free case the PWM consumer is responsible for disabling the PWM
before calling pwm_put() and there are three subcases to consider:
a) The PWM is already off. Then there is no gain in disabling the PWM
once more.
b) The PWM is still running and there is a good reason for that. (Not
sure this is a valid case, I cannot imagine such a good reason.)
Then it is counterproductive to disable the PWM.
c) The PWM is still running because the consumer failed to disable the
PWM. Then the consumer needs fixing and there is little incentive to
paper over the problem in the backend driver.
This aligns the lpc18xx-sct driver to the other PWM drivers that also
don't reconfigure the hardware in .request and .free.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The lpc-18xx driver currently manipulates the pwm_device struct directly
rather than using the pwm_set_chip_data() function. While the current
method may save a clock cycle or two, using the explicit function call
makes it more obvious that data is set to the local chip data pointer.
Signed-off-by: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl>
Reviewed-by: Ariel D'Alessandro <ariel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use pwm_get/set_xxx() helpers instead of directly accessing the pwm->xxx
field. Doing that will ease adaptation of the PWM framework to support
atomic update.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The clk API may return 0 on clk_get_rate(), so we should check the
result before using it as a divisor.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Acked-by: Joachim Eastwood <manabian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
|
This commit adds support for NXP LPC18xx PWM/SCT.
NXP LPC SoCs family, which includes LPC18xx/LPC43xx, provides a State
Configurable Timer (SCT) which can be configured as a Pulse Width
Modulator. Other SoCs in that family may share the same hardware.
The PWM supports a total of 16 channels, but only 15 can be simultaneously
requested. There's only one period, global to all the channels, thus PWM
driver will refuse setting different values to it, unless there's only one
channel requested.
Signed-off-by: Ariel D'Alessandro <ariel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
[thierry.reding@gmail.com: remove excessive padding of fields]
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
