| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
On sparc, if we have an alloca() like situation, as is the case with
SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK(), we can end up referencing deallocated stack
memory. The result can be that the value is clobbered if a trap
or interrupt arrives at just the right instruction.
It only occurs if the function ends returning a value from that
alloca() area and that value can be placed into the return value
register using a single instruction.
For example, in lib/libcrc32c.c:crc32c() we end up with a return
sequence like:
return %i7+8
lduw [%o5+16], %o0 ! MEM[(u32 *)__shash_desc.1_10 + 16B],
%o5 holds the base of the on-stack area allocated for the shash
descriptor. But the return released the stack frame and the
register window.
So if an intererupt arrives between 'return' and 'lduw', then
the value read at %o5+16 can be corrupted.
Add a data compiler barrier to work around this problem. This is
exactly what the gcc fix will end up doing as well, and it absolutely
should not change the code generated for other cpus (unless gcc
on them has the same bug :-)
With crucial insight from Eric Sandeen.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Reported-by: Anatoly Pugachev <matorola@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since several architectures support hardware-accelerated crc32c
calculation, it would be nice to confirm that btrfs is actually using it.
We can see an elevated use count for the module, but it doesn't actually
show who the users are. This patch simply prints the name of the driver
after successfully initializing the shash.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
[ added a helper and used in module load-time message ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Replaced the use of a Variable Length Array In Struct (VLAIS) with a C99
compliant equivalent. This patch instead allocates the appropriate amount of
memory using a char array using the SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK macro.
The new code can be compiled with both gcc and clang.
Signed-off-by: Vinícius Tinti <viniciustinti@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan-Simon Möller <dl9pf@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Mark Charlebois <charlebm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Behan Webster <behanw@converseincode.com>
Acked-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
replace IS_ERR/PTR_ERR
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
|
|
After the change titled "Btrfs: add support for inode properties", if
btrfs was built-in the kernel (i.e. not as a module), it would cause a
kernel panic, as reported recently by Fengguang:
[ 2.024722] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
[ 2.027814] IP: [<ffffffff81501594>] crc32c+0xc/0x6b
[ 2.028684] PGD 0
[ 2.028684] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
[ 2.028684] Modules linked in:
[ 2.028684] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.13.0-rc7-04795-ga7b57c2 #1
[ 2.028684] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
[ 2.028684] task: ffff88000edba100 ti: ffff88000edd6000 task.ti: ffff88000edd6000
[ 2.028684] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81501594>] [<ffffffff81501594>] crc32c+0xc/0x6b
[ 2.028684] RSP: 0000:ffff88000edd7e58 EFLAGS: 00010246
[ 2.028684] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff82295550 RCX: 0000000000000000
[ 2.028684] RDX: 0000000000000011 RSI: ffffffff81efe393 RDI: 00000000fffffffe
[ 2.028684] RBP: ffff88000edd7e60 R08: 0000000000000003 R09: 0000000000015d20
[ 2.028684] R10: ffffffff81ef225e R11: ffffffff811b0222 R12: ffffffffffffffff
[ 2.028684] R13: 0000000000000239 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
[ 2.028684] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88000fa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 2.028684] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
[ 2.028684] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 000000000220c000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
[ 2.028684] Stack:
[ 2.028684] ffffffff82295550 ffff88000edd7e80 ffffffff8238af62 ffffffff8238ac05
[ 2.028684] 0000000000000000 ffff88000edd7e98 ffffffff8238ac0f ffffffff8238ac05
[ 2.028684] ffff88000edd7f08 ffffffff810002ba ffff88000edd7f00 ffffffff810e2404
[ 2.028684] Call Trace:
[ 2.028684] [<ffffffff8238af62>] btrfs_props_init+0x4f/0x96
[ 2.028684] [<ffffffff8238ac05>] ? ftrace_define_fields_btrfs_space_reservation+0x145/0x145
[ 2.028684] [<ffffffff8238ac0f>] init_btrfs_fs+0xa/0xf0
[ 2.028684] [<ffffffff8238ac05>] ? ftrace_define_fields_btrfs_space_reservation+0x145/0x145
[ 2.028684] [<ffffffff810002ba>] do_one_initcall+0xa4/0x13a
[ 2.028684] [<ffffffff810e2404>] ? parse_args+0x25f/0x33d
[ 2.028684] [<ffffffff8234cf75>] kernel_init_freeable+0x1aa/0x230
[ 2.028684] [<ffffffff8234c785>] ? do_early_param+0x88/0x88
[ 2.028684] [<ffffffff819f61b5>] ? rest_init+0x89/0x89
[ 2.028684] [<ffffffff819f61c3>] kernel_init+0xe/0x109
The issue here is that the initialization function of btrfs (super.c:init_btrfs_fs)
started using crc32c (from lib/libcrc32c.c). But when it needs to call crc32c (as
part of the properties initialization routine), the libcrc32c is not yet initialized,
so crc32c derreferenced a NULL pointer (lib/libcrc32c.c:tfm), causing the kernel
panic on boot.
The approach to fix this is to use crypto component directly to use its crc32c (which
is basically what lib/libcrc32c.c is, a wrapper around crypto). This is what ext4 is
doing as well, it uses crypto directly to get crc32c functionality.
Verified this works both when btrfs is built-in and when it's loadable kernel module.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
