| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The object-size sanitizer is redundant to -Warray-bounds, and
inappropriately performs its checks at run-time when all information
needed for the evaluation is available at compile-time, making it quite
difficult to use:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214861
With -Warray-bounds almost enabled globally, it doesn't make sense to
keep this around.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211203235346.110809-1-keescook@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Until recent versions of GCC and Clang, it was not possible to disable
KCOV instrumentation via a function attribute. The relevant function
attribute was introduced in 540540d06e9d9 ("kcov: add
__no_sanitize_coverage to fix noinstr for all architectures").
x86 was the first architecture to want a working noinstr, and at the
time no compiler support for the attribute existed yet. Therefore,
commit 0f1441b44e823 ("objtool: Fix noinstr vs KCOV") introduced the
ability to NOP __sanitizer_cov_*() calls in .noinstr.text.
However, this doesn't work for other architectures like arm64 and s390
that want a working noinstr per ARCH_WANTS_NO_INSTR.
At the time of 0f1441b44e823, we didn't yet have ARCH_WANTS_NO_INSTR,
but now we can move the Kconfig dependency checks to the generic KCOV
option. KCOV will be available if:
- architecture does not care about noinstr, OR
- we have objtool support (like on x86), OR
- GCC is 12.0 or newer, OR
- Clang is 13.0 or newer.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211201152604.3984495-1-elver@google.com
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Commit b05fbcc36be1 ("btrfs: disable build on platforms having page size
256K") disabled btrfs for configurations that used a 256kB page size.
However, it did not fully solve the problem because CONFIG_TEST_KMOD
selects CONFIG_BTRFS, which does not account for the dependency. This
results in a Kconfig warning and the failed BUILD_BUG_ON error
returning.
WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for BTRFS_FS
Depends on [n]: BLOCK [=y] && !PPC_256K_PAGES && !PAGE_SIZE_256KB [=y]
Selected by [m]:
- TEST_KMOD [=m] && RUNTIME_TESTING_MENU [=y] && m && MODULES [=y] && NETDEVICES [=y] && NET_CORE [=y] && INET [=y] && BLOCK [=y]
To resolve this, add CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_LESS_THAN_256KB as a dependency of
CONFIG_TEST_KMOD so there is no more invalid configuration or build
errors.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211129230141.228085-4-nathan@kernel.org
Fixes: b05fbcc36be1 ("btrfs: disable build on platforms having page size 256K")
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Use the newly introduced CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_LESS_THAN_256KB to describe
the dependency introduced by commit b05fbcc36be1 ("btrfs: disable build
on platforms having page size 256K").
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211129230141.228085-3-nathan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Patch series "Fix CONFIG_TEST_KMOD with 256kB page size".
The kernel test robot reported a build error [1] from a failed assertion
in fs/btrfs/inode.c with a hexagon randconfig that includes
CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_256KB. This error is the same one that was addressed
by commit b05fbcc36be1 ("btrfs: disable build on platforms having page
size 256K") but CONFIG_TEST_KMOD selects CONFIG_BTRFS without having the
"page size less than 256kB dependency", which results in the error
reappearing.
The first patch introduces CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_LESS_THAN_256KB by splitting
it off from CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_LESS_THAN_64KB, which was introduced in
commit 1f0e290cc5fd ("arch: Add generic Kconfig option indicating page
size smaller than 64k") for a similar reason in 5.16-rc3.
The second patch uses that configuration option for CONFIG_BTRFS to
reduce duplication.
The third patch resolves the build error by adding
CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_LESS_THAN_256KB as a dependency to CONFIG_TEST_KMOD so
that CONFIG_BTRFS does not get enabled under that invalid configuration.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202111270255.UYOoN5VN-lkp@intel.com/
This patch (of 3):
btrfs requires a page size smaller than 256kB. To use that dependency
in other places, introduce CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_LESS_THAN_256KB and reuse
that dependency in CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_LESS_THAN_64KB.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211129230141.228085-1-nathan@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211129230141.228085-2-nathan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
