summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h (follow)
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* ACPI: CPPC: Add auto select register read/write supportWyes Karny2023-03-171-0/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | For some AMD shared memory based systems, the autonomous selection bit needed to be set explicitly. Add autonomous selection register related APIs to acpi driver, which amd_pstate driver uses later. Acked-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name> Signed-off-by: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@amd.com> [ rjw: Fixed up kerneldoc comments, white space adjustment, subject edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* ACPI: CPPC: Add AMD pstate energy performance preference cppc controlPerry Yuan2023-02-031-0/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add support for setting and querying EPP preferences to the generic CPPC driver. This enables downstream drivers such as amd-pstate to discover and use these values. Downstream drivers that want to use the new symbols cppc_get_epp_caps and cppc_set_epp_perf for querying and setting EPP preferences will need to call cppc_set_epp_perf to enable the EPP function firstly. Acked-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@amd.com> Tested-by: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <Perry.Yuan@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* ACPI: CPPC: Disable FIE if registers in PCC regionsJeremy Linton2022-09-241-0/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PCC regions utilize a mailbox to set/retrieve register values used by the CPPC code. This is fine as long as the operations are infrequent. With the FIE code enabled though the overhead can range from 2-11% of system CPU overhead (ex: as measured by top) on Arm based machines. So, before enabling FIE assure none of the registers used by cppc_get_perf_ctrs() are in the PCC region. Finally, add a module parameter which can override the PCC region detection at boot or module reload. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* ACPI: CPPC: Do not prevent CPPC from working in the futureRafael J. Wysocki2022-07-261-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There is a problem with the current revision checks in is_cppc_supported() that they essentially prevent the CPPC support from working if a new _CPC package format revision being a proper superset of the v3 and only causing _CPC to return a package with more entries (while retaining the types and meaning of the entries defined by the v3) is introduced in the future and used by the platform firmware. In that case, as long as the number of entries in the _CPC return package is at least CPPC_V3_NUM_ENT, it should be perfectly fine to use the v3 support code and disregard the additional package entries added by the new package format revision. For this reason, drop is_cppc_supported() altogether, put the revision checks directly into acpi_cppc_processor_probe() so they are easier to follow and rework them to take the case mentioned above into account. Fixes: 4773e77cdc9b ("ACPI / CPPC: Add support for CPPC v3") Cc: 4.18+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.18+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* ACPI: CPPC: Don't require _OSC if X86_FEATURE_CPPC is supportedMario Limonciello2022-07-051-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | commit 72f2ecb7ece7 ("ACPI: bus: Set CPPC _OSC bits for all and when CPPC_LIB is supported") added support for claiming to support CPPC in _OSC on non-Intel platforms. This unfortunately caused a regression on a vartiety of AMD platforms in the field because a number of AMD platforms don't set the `_OSC` bit 5 or 6 to indicate CPPC or CPPC v2 support. As these AMD platforms already claim CPPC support via a dedicated MSR from `X86_FEATURE_CPPC`, use this enable this feature rather than requiring the `_OSC` on platforms with a dedicated MSR. If there is additional breakage on the shared memory designs also missing this _OSC, additional follow up changes may be needed. Fixes: 72f2ecb7ece7 ("Set CPPC _OSC bits for all and when CPPC_LIB is supported") Reported-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* cpufreq: CPPC: Enable fast_switchPierre Gondois2022-05-191-0/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The communication mean of the _CPC desired performance can be PCC, System Memory, System IO, or Functional Fixed Hardware. commit b7898fda5bc7 ("cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching") fast_switching is 'for switching CPU frequencies from interrupt context'. Writes to SystemMemory and SystemIo are fast and suitable this. This is not the case for PCC and might not be the case for FFH. Enable fast_switching for the cppc_cpufreq driver in above cases. Add cppc_allow_fast_switch() to check the desired performance register address space and set fast_switching accordingly. Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* ACPI: CPPC: Add CPPC enable register functionJinzhou Su2021-12-301-0/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add a new function to enable CPPC feature. This function will write Continuous Performance Control package EnableRegister field on the processor. CPPC EnableRegister register described in section 8.4.7.1 of ACPI 6.4: This element is optional. If supported, contains a resource descriptor with a single Register() descriptor that describes a register to which OSPM writes a One to enable CPPC on this processor. Before this register is set, the processor will be controlled by legacy mechanisms (ACPI Pstates, firmware, etc.). This register will be used for AMD processors to enable AMD P-State function instead of legacy ACPI P-States. Signed-off-by: Jinzhou Su <Jinzhou.Su@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* ACPI: CPPC: Introduce cppc_get_nominal_perf()Rafael J. Wysocki2021-09-071-0/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | On some systems the nominal_perf value retrieved via CPPC is just a constant and fetching it doesn't require accessing any registers, so if it is the only CPPC capability that's needed, it is wasteful to run cppc_get_perf_caps() in order to get just that value alone, especially when this is done for CPUs other than the one running the code. For this reason, introduce cppc_get_nominal_perf() allowing nominal_perf to be obtained individually, by generalizing the existing cppc_get_desired_perf() (and renaming it) so it can be used to retrieve any specific CPPC capability value. While at it, clean up the cppc_get_desired_perf() kerneldoc comment a bit. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* ACPI: CPPC: Add emtpy stubs of functions for CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB unsetRafael J. Wysocki2021-03-231-0/+40
| | | | | | | | | | | | For convenience, add empty stubs of library functions defined in cppc_acpi.c for the CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB unset case. Because one of them needs to return CPUFREQ_ETERNAL, include linux/cpufreq.h into the CPPC library header file and drop the direct inclusion of it from cppc_acpi.c. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
* ACPI: CPPC: remove __iomem annotation for cpc_reg's addressIonela Voinescu2021-01-221-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The cpc_reg address does not represent either an I/O virtual address, nor a field located in iomem. This address is used as an address offset which eventually is given as physical address argument to ioremap or PCC space offset to GET_PCC_VADDR. Therefore, having the __iomem annotation does not make sense. Fix the following sparse warnings by removing the __iomem annotation for cpc_reg's address. drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:762:37: warning: dereference of noderef expression drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:765:48: warning: dereference of noderef expression drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:948:25: warning: dereference of noderef expression drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:954:67: warning: dereference of noderef expression drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:987:25: warning: dereference of noderef expression drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:993:68: warning: dereference of noderef expression drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:1120:13: warning: dereference of noderef expression drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:1134:13: warning: dereference of noderef expression drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:1137:13: warning: dereference of noderef expression drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:1182:14: warning: dereference of noderef expression drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:1212:13: warning: dereference of noderef expression Suggested-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* cppc_cpufreq: replace per-cpu data array with a listIonela Voinescu2020-12-151-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The cppc_cpudata per-cpu storage was inefficient (1) additional to causing functional issues (2) when CPUs are hotplugged out, due to per-cpu data being improperly initialised. (1) The amount of information needed for CPPC performance control in its cpufreq driver depends on the domain (PSD) coordination type: ANY: One set of CPPC control and capability data (e.g desired performance, highest/lowest performance, etc) applies to all CPUs in the domain. ALL: Same as ANY. To be noted that this type is not currently supported. When supported, information about which CPUs belong to a domain is needed in order for frequency change requests to be sent to each of them. HW: It's necessary to store CPPC control and capability information for all the CPUs. HW will then coordinate the performance state based on their limitations and requests. NONE: Same as HW. No HW coordination is expected. Despite this, the previous initialisation code would indiscriminately allocate memory for all CPUs (all_cpu_data) and unnecessarily duplicate performance capabilities and the domain sharing mask and type for each possible CPU. (2) With the current per-cpu structure, when having ANY coordination, the cppc_cpudata cpu information is not initialised (will remain 0) for all CPUs in a policy, other than policy->cpu. When policy->cpu is hotplugged out, the driver will incorrectly use the uninitialised (0) value of the other CPUs when making frequency changes. Additionally, the previous values stored in the perf_ctrls.desired_perf will be lost when policy->cpu changes. Therefore replace the array of per cpu data with a list. The memory for each structure is allocated at policy init, where a single structure can be allocated per policy, not per cpu. In order to accommodate the struct list_head node in the cppc_cpudata structure, the now unused cpu and cur_policy variables are removed. For example, on a arm64 Juno platform with 6 CPUs: (0, 1, 2, 3) in PSD1, (4, 5) in PSD2 - ANY coordination, the memory allocation comparison shows: Before patch: - ANY coordination: total slack req alloc/free caller 0 0 0 0/1 _kernel_size_le_hi32+0x0xffff800008ff7810 0 0 0 0/6 _kernel_size_le_hi32+0x0xffff800008ff7808 128 80 48 1/0 _kernel_size_le_hi32+0x0xffff800008ffc070 768 0 768 6/0 _kernel_size_le_hi32+0x0xffff800008ffc0e4 After patch: - ANY coordination: total slack req alloc/free caller 256 0 256 2/0 _kernel_size_le_hi32+0x0xffff800008fed410 0 0 0 0/2 _kernel_size_le_hi32+0x0xffff800008fed274 Additional notes: - A pointer to the policy's cppc_cpudata is stored in policy->driver_data - Driver registration is skipped if _CPC entries are not present. Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Tested-by: Mian Yousaf Kaukab <ykaukab@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 441Thomas Gleixner2019-06-051-5/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation version 2 of the license extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-only has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 315 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Reviewed-by: Armijn Hemel <armijn@tjaldur.nl> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190531190115.503150771@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
* ACPI / CPPC: Add a helper to get desired performanceXiongfeng Wang2019-02-181-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | This patch add a helper to get the value of desired performance register. Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> [ rjw: More white space ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* x86/kernel: Fix more -Wmissing-prototypes warningsBorislav Petkov2018-12-081-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ... with the goal of eventually enabling -Wmissing-prototypes by default. At least on x86. Make functions static where possible, otherwise add prototypes or make them visible through includes. asm/trace/ changes courtesy of Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> # ACPI + cpufreq bits Cc: Andrew Banman <andrew.banman@hpe.com> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com> Cc: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
* ACPI / CPPC: Add support for guaranteed performanceSrinivas Pandruvada2018-10-161-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | The Continuous Performance Control package may contain an optional guaranteed performance field. Add support to read guaranteed performance from _CPC. Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* ACPI / CPPC: Add support for CPPC v3Prashanth Prakash2018-04-241-4/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | CPPC V3 introduces two new entries to make it easier to convert between abstract processor performance and frequency. The two new entries are lowest frequency and nominal frequency. These are the frequencies corresponding to lowest and nominal abstract performance. Add support to read the new entries and populate them as part of the CPPC performance capabilities which can be used by cpufreq drivers Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs entries for CPPC perf capabilitiesPrakash, Prashanth2017-04-181-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Computed delivered performance using CPPC feedback counters are in the CPPC abstract scale, whereas cppc_cpufreq driver operates in KHz scale. Exposing the CPPC performance capabilities (highest,lowest, nominal, lowest non-linear) will allow userspace to figure out the conversion factor from CPPC abstract scale to KHz. Also rename ctr_wrap_time to wraparound_time so that show_cppc_data() macro will work with it. Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* ACPI / CPPC: Read lowest nonlinear perf in cppc_get_perf_caps()Prakash, Prashanth2017-04-181-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | Read lowest non linear perf in cppc_get_perf_caps so that it can be exposed via sysfs to the usespace. Lowest non linear perf is the lowest performance level at which nonlinear power savings are achieved. Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* ACPI / CPPC: Add prefix cppc to cpudata structure nameSrinivas Pandruvada2016-09-081-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | Since struct cpudata is defined in a header file, add prefix cppc_ to make it not a generic name. Otherwise it causes compile issue in locally define structure with the same name. Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* ACPI / CPPC: check for error bit in PCC status fieldPrakash, Prashanth2016-08-311-1/+3
| | | | | | | | | PCC status field exposes an error bit(2) to indicate any errors during the execution of last comamnd. This patch checks the error bit before notifying success/failure to the cpufreq driver. Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performanceAshwin Chaugule2016-08-311-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The CPPC tables contain entries for per CPU feedback counters which allows us to compute the delivered performance over a given interval of time. The math for delivered performance per the CPPCv5.0+ spec is: reference perf * delta(delivered perf ctr)/delta(ref perf ctr) Maintaining deltas of the counters in the kernel is messy, as it depends on when the reads are triggered. (e.g. via the cpufreq ->get() interface). Also the ->get() interace only returns one value, so cant return raw values. So instead, leave it to userspace to keep track of raw values and do its math for CPUs it cares about. delivered and reference perf counters are exposed via the same sysfs file to avoid the potential "skid", if these values are read individually from userspace. Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* ACPI / CPPC: set a non-zero value for transition_latencyPrakash, Prashanth2016-08-311-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | Compute the expected transition latency for frequency transitions using the values from the PCCT tables when the desired perf register is in PCC. Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* ACPI / CPPC: support for batching CPPC requestsPrakash, Prashanth2016-08-311-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CPPC defined in section 8.4.7 of ACPI 6.0 specification suggests "To amortize the cost of PCC transactions, OSPM should read or write all PCC registers via a single read or write command when possible" This patch enables opportunistic batching of frequency transition requests whenever the request happen to overlap in time. Currently the access to pcc is serialized by a spin lock which does not scale well as we increase the number of cores in the system. This patch improves the scalability by allowing the differnt CPU cores to update PCC subspace in parallel and by batching requests which will reduce the certain types of operation(checking command completion bit, ringing doorbell) by a significant margin. Profiling shows significant improvement in the overall effeciency to service freq. transition requests. With this patch we observe close to 30% of the frequency transition requests being batched with other requests while running apache bench on a ARM platform with 6 independent domains(or sets of related cpus). Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* ACPI / CPPC: restructure read/writes for efficient sys mapped reg opsAshwin Chaugule2016-08-311-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | For cases where sys mapped CPC registers need to be accessed frequently, it helps immensly to pre-map them rather than map and unmap for each operation. e.g. case where feedback counters are sys mem map registers. Restructure cpc_read/write and the cpc_regs structure to allow pre-mapping the system addresses and unmap them when the CPU exits. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* mailbox: pcc: Add PCC request and free channel declarationsHoan Tran2016-06-251-6/+1
| | | | | | | | | Exports pcc_mbox_request_channel() and pcc_mbox_free_channel() declarations into a pcc.h header file. Looks-good-to: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Hoan Tran <hotran@apm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* ACPI / CPPC: remove redundant mbox_send_message() declarationTimur Tabi2016-02-031-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | Remove a redundant function declaration in cppc_acpi.h for mbox_send_message(). That function is defined in mailbox_client.h, which is already included. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPCAshwin Chaugule2015-10-121-0/+138
CPPC stands for Collaborative Processor Performance Controls and is defined in the ACPI v5.0+ spec. It describes CPU performance controls on an abstract and continuous scale allowing the platform (e.g. remote power processor) to flexibly optimize CPU performance with its knowledge of power budgets and other architecture specific knowledge. This patch adds a shim which exports commonly used functions to get and set CPPC specific controls for each CPU. This enables CPUFreq drivers to gather per CPU performance data and use with exisiting governors or even allows for customized governors which are implemented inside CPUFreq drivers. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>