| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now that all drivers have been converted over to the per-plane rotation
property, we can just nuke the global rotation property.
v2: Rebase due to BIT(),__builtin_ffs() & co.
Deal with superfluous code shuffling
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1477077768-4274-4-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Not all planes on the system may support the same rotations/reflections,
so make it possible to create a separate property for each plane.
This way userspace gets told exactly which rotations/reflections are
possible for each plane.
v2: Add drm_plane_create_rotation_property() helper
v3: Drop the BIT(), __builtin_ffs(x) - 1,
Moar WARNs for bad parameters
Deal with superfluous code shuffling
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v1)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1474907460-10717-4-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We have intel_rotation_90_or_270() in i915 to check if the rotation is
90 or 270 degrees. Similar checks are elsewhere in drm, so let's move
the helper into a central place and use it everwhere.
v2: Drop the BIT()
Convert all new intel_rotation_90_or_270() calls
Deal with superfluous code shuffling
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v1)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1474907460-10717-2-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Turns out assuming that only stuff in uabi is uabi is a bit naive, and
we have a bunch of properties for which the enum values are placed in
random headers. A proper fix would be to split out uapi include
headers, but meanwhile sprinkle at least some warning over them.
Fixes: 532b36712ddf ("drm/doc: Polish for drm_plane.[hc]")
Cc: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1474612525-9488-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
|
|
|
Imo zpos, rotatation, blending eq (once we have it) and all that
should be in drm_blend.c, since those are all about how exactly the
pixels are rendered onto the CRTC's visible area. Also noticed that
one exported function accidentally ended up in drm_crtc_internal.h,
move it to the right place too.
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1474448370-32227-3-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
|
