summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/sched (follow)
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* sched/fair: Fix unthrottle_cfs_rq() for leaf_cfs_rq listVincent Guittot2020-05-191-12/+30
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Although not exactly identical, unthrottle_cfs_rq() and enqueue_task_fair() are quite close and follow the same sequence for enqueuing an entity in the cfs hierarchy. Modify unthrottle_cfs_rq() to use the same pattern as enqueue_task_fair(). This fixes a problem already faced with the latter and add an optimization in the last for_each_sched_entity loop. Fixes: fe61468b2cb (sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning) Reported-by Tao Zhou <zohooouoto@zoho.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200513135528.4742-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
* sched/debug: Fix requested task uclamp values shown in procfsPavankumar Kondeti2020-05-191-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The intention of commit 96e74ebf8d59 ("sched/debug: Add task uclamp values to SCHED_DEBUG procfs") was to print requested and effective task uclamp values. The requested values printed are read from p->uclamp, which holds the last effective values. Fix this by printing the values from p->uclamp_req. Fixes: 96e74ebf8d59 ("sched/debug: Add task uclamp values to SCHED_DEBUG procfs") Signed-off-by: Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1589115401-26391-1-git-send-email-pkondeti@codeaurora.org
* sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair() warning some morePhil Auld2020-05-191-0/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning some more The recent patch, fe61468b2cb (sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning) did not fully resolve the issues with the rq->tmp_alone_branch != &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list warning in enqueue_task_fair. There is a case where the first for_each_sched_entity loop exits due to on_rq, having incompletely updated the list. In this case the second for_each_sched_entity loop can further modify se. The later code to fix up the list management fails to do what is needed because se does not point to the sched_entity which broke out of the first loop. The list is not fixed up because the throttled parent was already added back to the list by a task enqueue in a parallel child hierarchy. Address this by calling list_add_leaf_cfs_rq if there are throttled parents while doing the second for_each_sched_entity loop. Fixes: fe61468b2cb ("sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning") Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200512135222.GC2201@lorien.usersys.redhat.com
* sched/core: Fix reset-on-fork from RT with uclampQuentin Perret2020-04-221-7/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | uclamp_fork() resets the uclamp values to their default when the reset-on-fork flag is set. It also checks whether the task has a RT policy, and sets its uclamp.min to 1024 accordingly. However, during reset-on-fork, the task's policy is lowered to SCHED_NORMAL right after, hence leading to an erroneous uclamp.min setting for the new task if it was forked from RT. Fix this by removing the unnecessary check on rt_task() in uclamp_fork() as this doesn't make sense if the reset-on-fork flag is set. Fixes: 1a00d999971c ("sched/uclamp: Set default clamps for RT tasks") Reported-by: Chitti Babu Theegala <ctheegal@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@matbug.net> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200416085956.217587-1-qperret@google.com
* sched/vtime: Work around an unitialized variable warningBorislav Petkov2020-04-151-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Work around this warning: kernel/sched/cputime.c: In function ‘kcpustat_field’: kernel/sched/cputime.c:1007:6: warning: ‘val’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] because GCC can't see that val is used only when err is 0. Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200327214334.GF8015@zn.tnic
* sched/isolation: Allow "isolcpus=" to skip unknown sub-parametersPeter Xu2020-04-151-2/+19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The "isolcpus=" parameter allows sub-parameters before the cpulist is specified, and if the parser detects an unknown sub-parameters the whole parameter will be ignored. This design is incompatible with itself when new sub-parameters are added. An older kernel will not recognize the new sub-parameter and will invalidate the whole parameter so the CPU isolation will not take effect. It emits a warning: isolcpus: Error, unknown flag The better and compatible way is to allow "isolcpus=" to skip unknown sub-parameters, so that even if new sub-parameters are added an older kernel will still be able to behave as usual even if with the new sub-parameter specified on the command line. Ideally this should have been there when the first sub-parameter for "isolcpus=" was introduced. Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200403223517.406353-1-peterx@redhat.com
* sched/debug: Add task uclamp values to SCHED_DEBUG procfsValentin Schneider2020-04-081-0/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | Requested and effective uclamp values can be a bit tricky to decipher when playing with cgroup hierarchies. Add them to a task's procfs when SCHED_DEBUG is enabled. Reviewed-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200226124543.31986-4-valentin.schneider@arm.com
* sched/debug: Factor out printing formats into common macrosValentin Schneider2020-04-081-14/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | The printing macros in debug.c keep redefining the same output format. Collect each output format in a single definition, and reuse that definition in the other macros. While at it, add a layer of parentheses and replace printf's with the newly introduced macros. Reviewed-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200226124543.31986-3-valentin.schneider@arm.com
* sched/debug: Remove redundant macro defineValentin Schneider2020-04-081-12/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Most printing macros for procfs are defined globally in debug.c, and they are re-defined (to the exact same thing) within proc_sched_show_task(). Get rid of the duplicate defines. Reviewed-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200226124543.31986-2-valentin.schneider@arm.com
* sched/core: Remove unused rq::last_load_update_tickVincent Donnefort2020-04-082-2/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The following commit: 5e83eafbfd3b ("sched/fair: Remove the rq->cpu_load[] update code") eliminated the last use case for rq->last_load_update_tick, so remove the field as well. Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1584710495-308969-1-git-send-email-vincent.donnefort@arm.com
* workqueue: Remove the warning in wq_worker_sleeping()Sebastian Andrzej Siewior2020-04-081-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The kernel test robot triggered a warning with the following race: task-ctx A interrupt-ctx B worker -> process_one_work() -> work_item() -> schedule(); -> sched_submit_work() -> wq_worker_sleeping() -> ->sleeping = 1 atomic_dec_and_test(nr_running) __schedule(); *interrupt* async_page_fault() -> local_irq_enable(); -> schedule(); -> sched_submit_work() -> wq_worker_sleeping() -> if (WARN_ON(->sleeping)) return -> __schedule() -> sched_update_worker() -> wq_worker_running() -> atomic_inc(nr_running); -> ->sleeping = 0; -> sched_update_worker() -> wq_worker_running() if (!->sleeping) return In this context the warning is pointless everything is fine. An interrupt before wq_worker_sleeping() will perform the ->sleeping assignment (0 -> 1 > 0) twice. An interrupt after wq_worker_sleeping() will trigger the warning and nr_running will be decremented (by A) and incremented once (only by B, A will skip it). This is the case until the ->sleeping is zeroed again in wq_worker_running(). Remove the WARN statement because this condition may happen. Document that preemption around wq_worker_sleeping() needs to be disabled to protect ->sleeping and not just as an optimisation. Fixes: 6d25be5782e48 ("sched/core, workqueues: Distangle worker accounting from rq lock") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200327074308.GY11705@shao2-debian
* sched/fair: Fix negative imbalance in imbalance calculationAubrey Li2020-04-081-0/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A negative imbalance value was observed after imbalance calculation, this happens when the local sched group type is group_fully_busy, and the average load of local group is greater than the selected busiest group. Fix this problem by comparing the average load of the local and busiest group before imbalance calculation formula. Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1585201349-70192-1-git-send-email-aubrey.li@intel.com
* sched/fair: Fix race between runtime distribution and assignmentHuaixin Chang2020-04-081-20/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, there is a potential race between distribute_cfs_runtime() and assign_cfs_rq_runtime(). Race happens when cfs_b->runtime is read, distributes without holding lock and finds out there is not enough runtime to charge against after distribution. Because assign_cfs_rq_runtime() might be called during distribution, and use cfs_b->runtime at the same time. Fibtest is the tool to test this race. Assume all gcfs_rq is throttled and cfs period timer runs, slow threads might run and sleep, returning unused cfs_rq runtime and keeping min_cfs_rq_runtime in their local pool. If all this happens sufficiently quickly, cfs_b->runtime will drop a lot. If runtime distributed is large too, over-use of runtime happens. A runtime over-using by about 70 percent of quota is seen when we test fibtest on a 96-core machine. We run fibtest with 1 fast thread and 95 slow threads in test group, configure 10ms quota for this group and see the CPU usage of fibtest is 17.0%, which is far more than the expected 10%. On a smaller machine with 32 cores, we also run fibtest with 96 threads. CPU usage is more than 12%, which is also more than expected 10%. This shows that on similar workloads, this race do affect CPU bandwidth control. Solve this by holding lock inside distribute_cfs_runtime(). Fixes: c06f04c70489 ("sched: Fix potential near-infinite distribute_cfs_runtime() loop") Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com> Signed-off-by: Huaixin Chang <changhuaixin@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200325092602.22471-1-changhuaixin@linux.alibaba.com/
* sched/fair: Align rq->avg_idle and rq->avg_scan_costValentin Schneider2020-04-083-11/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | sched/core.c uses update_avg() for rq->avg_idle and sched/fair.c uses an open-coded version (with the exact same decay factor) for rq->avg_scan_cost. On top of that, select_idle_cpu() expects to be able to compare these two fields. The only difference between the two is that rq->avg_scan_cost is computed using a pure division rather than a shift. Turns out it actually matters, first of all because the shifted value can be negative, and the standard has this to say about it: """ The result of E1 >> E2 is E1 right-shifted E2 bit positions. [...] If E1 has a signed type and a negative value, the resulting value is implementation-defined. """ Not only this, but (arithmetic) right shifting a negative value (using 2's complement) is *not* equivalent to dividing it by the corresponding power of 2. Let's look at a few examples: -4 -> 0xF..FC -4 >> 3 -> 0xF..FF == -1 != -4 / 8 -8 -> 0xF..F8 -8 >> 3 -> 0xF..FF == -1 == -8 / 8 -9 -> 0xF..F7 -9 >> 3 -> 0xF..FE == -2 != -9 / 8 Make update_avg() use a division, and export it to the private scheduler header to reuse it where relevant. Note that this still lets compilers use a shift here, but should prevent any unwanted surprise. The disassembly of select_idle_cpu() remains unchanged on arm64, and ttwu_do_wakeup() gains 2 instructions; the diff sort of looks like this: - sub x1, x1, x0 + subs x1, x1, x0 // set condition codes + add x0, x1, #0x7 + csel x0, x0, x1, mi // x0 = x1 < 0 ? x0 : x1 add x0, x3, x0, asr #3 which does the right thing (i.e. gives us the expected result while still using an arithmetic shift) Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200330090127.16294-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com
* mm/vma: make vma_is_accessible() available for general useAnshuman Khandual2020-04-071-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Lets move vma_is_accessible() helper to include/linux/mm.h which makes it available for general use. While here, this replaces all remaining open encodings for VMA access check with vma_is_accessible(). Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Acked-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Paul Burton <paulburton@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1582520593-30704-3-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* Merge tag 'smp-core-2020-03-30' of ↵Linus Torvalds2020-03-312-8/+2
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull core SMP updates from Thomas Gleixner: "CPU (hotplug) updates: - Support for locked CSD objects in smp_call_function_single_async() which allows to simplify callsites in the scheduler core and MIPS - Treewide consolidation of CPU hotplug functions which ensures the consistency between the sysfs interface and kernel state. The low level functions cpu_up/down() are now confined to the core code and not longer accessible from random code" * tag 'smp-core-2020-03-30' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (22 commits) cpu/hotplug: Ignore pm_wakeup_pending() for disable_nonboot_cpus() cpu/hotplug: Hide cpu_up/down() cpu/hotplug: Move bringup of secondary CPUs out of smp_init() torture: Replace cpu_up/down() with add/remove_cpu() firmware: psci: Replace cpu_up/down() with add/remove_cpu() xen/cpuhotplug: Replace cpu_up/down() with device_online/offline() parisc: Replace cpu_up/down() with add/remove_cpu() sparc: Replace cpu_up/down() with add/remove_cpu() powerpc: Replace cpu_up/down() with add/remove_cpu() x86/smp: Replace cpu_up/down() with add/remove_cpu() arm64: hibernate: Use bringup_hibernate_cpu() cpu/hotplug: Provide bringup_hibernate_cpu() arm64: Use reboot_cpu instead of hardconding it to 0 arm64: Don't use disable_nonboot_cpus() ARM: Use reboot_cpu instead of hardcoding it to 0 ARM: Don't use disable_nonboot_cpus() ia64: Replace cpu_down() with smp_shutdown_nonboot_cpus() cpu/hotplug: Create a new function to shutdown nonboot cpus cpu/hotplug: Add new {add,remove}_cpu() functions sched/core: Remove rq.hrtick_csd_pending ...
| * sched/core: Remove rq.hrtick_csd_pendingPeter Xu2020-03-062-8/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Now smp_call_function_single_async() provides the protection that we'll return with -EBUSY if the csd object is still pending, then we don't need the rq.hrtick_csd_pending any more. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191216213125.9536-4-peterx@redhat.com
* | Merge branch 'sched-core-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds2020-03-3114-460/+1011
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull scheduler updates from Ingo Molnar: "The main changes in this cycle are: - Various NUMA scheduling updates: harmonize the load-balancer and NUMA placement logic to not work against each other. The intended result is better locality, better utilization and fewer migrations. - Introduce Thermal Pressure tracking and optimizations, to improve task placement on thermally overloaded systems. - Implement frequency invariant scheduler accounting on (some) x86 CPUs. This is done by observing and sampling the 'recent' CPU frequency average at ~tick boundaries. The CPU provides this data via the APERF/MPERF MSRs. This hopefully makes our capacity estimates more precise and keeps tasks on the same CPU better even if it might seem overloaded at a lower momentary frequency. (As usual, turbo mode is a complication that we resolve by observing the maximum frequency and renormalizing to it.) - Add asymmetric CPU capacity wakeup scan to improve capacity utilization on asymmetric topologies. (big.LITTLE systems) - PSI fixes and optimizations. - RT scheduling capacity awareness fixes & improvements. - Optimize the CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED constraints code. - Misc fixes, cleanups and optimizations - see the changelog for details" * 'sched-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (62 commits) threads: Update PID limit comment according to futex UAPI change sched/fair: Fix condition of avg_load calculation sched/rt: cpupri_find: Trigger a full search as fallback kthread: Do not preempt current task if it is going to call schedule() sched/fair: Improve spreading of utilization sched: Avoid scale real weight down to zero psi: Move PF_MEMSTALL out of task->flags MAINTAINERS: Add maintenance information for psi psi: Optimize switching tasks inside shared cgroups psi: Fix cpu.pressure for cpu.max and competing cgroups sched/core: Distribute tasks within affinity masks sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning thermal/cpu-cooling, sched/core: Move the arch_set_thermal_pressure() API to generic scheduler code sched/rt: Remove unnecessary push for unfit tasks sched/rt: Allow pulling unfitting task sched/rt: Optimize cpupri_find() on non-heterogenous systems sched/rt: Re-instate old behavior in select_task_rq_rt() sched/rt: cpupri_find: Implement fallback mechanism for !fit case sched/fair: Fix reordering of enqueue/dequeue_task_fair() sched/fair: Fix runnable_avg for throttled cfs ...
| * | sched/fair: Fix condition of avg_load calculationTao Zhou2020-03-201-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In update_sg_wakeup_stats(), the comment says: Computing avg_load makes sense only when group is fully busy or overloaded. But, the code below this comment does not check like this. From reading the code about avg_load in other functions, I confirm that avg_load should be calculated in fully busy or overloaded case. The comment is correct and the checking condition is wrong. So, change that condition. Fixes: 57abff067a08 ("sched/fair: Rework find_idlest_group()") Signed-off-by: Tao Zhou <ouwen210@hotmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Message-ID:
| * | sched/rt: cpupri_find: Trigger a full search as fallbackQais Yousef2020-03-201-23/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If we failed to find a fitting CPU, in cpupri_find(), we only fallback to the level we found a hit at. But Steve suggested to fallback to a second full scan instead as this could be a better effort. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200304135404.146c56eb@gandalf.local.home/ We trigger the 2nd search unconditionally since the argument about triggering a full search is that the recorded fall back level might have become empty by then. Which means storing any data about what happened would be meaningless and stale. I had a humble try at timing it and it seemed okay for the small 6 CPUs system I was running on https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200305124324.42x6ehjxbnjkklnh@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com/ On large system this second full scan could be expensive. But there are no users outside capacity awareness for this fitness function at the moment. Heterogeneous systems tend to be small with 8cores in total. Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200310142219.syxzn5ljpdxqtbgx@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com
| * | sched/fair: Improve spreading of utilizationVincent Guittot2020-03-201-0/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | During load_balancing, a group with spare capacity will try to pull some utilizations from an overloaded group. In such case, the load balance looks for the runqueue with the highest utilization. Nevertheless, it should also ensure that there are some pending tasks to pull otherwise the load balance will fail to pull a task and the spread of the load will be delayed. This situation is quite transient but it's possible to highlight the effect with a short run of sysbench test so the time to spread task impacts the global result significantly. Below are the average results for 15 iterations on an arm64 octo core: sysbench --test=cpu --num-threads=8 --max-requests=1000 run tip/sched/core +patchset total time: 172ms 158ms per-request statistics: avg: 1.337ms 1.244ms max: 21.191ms 10.753ms The average max doesn't fully reflect the wide spread of the value which ranges from 1.350ms to more than 41ms for the tip/sched/core and from 1.350ms to 21ms with the patch. Other factors like waiting for an idle load balance or cache hotness can delay the spreading of the tasks which explains why we can still have up to 21ms with the patch. Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200312165429.990-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
| * | sched: Avoid scale real weight down to zeroMichael Wang2020-03-201-1/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | During our testing, we found a case that shares no longer working correctly, the cgroup topology is like: /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/A (shares=102400) /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/A/B (shares=2) /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/A/B/C (shares=1024) /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/D (shares=1024) /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/D/E (shares=1024) /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/D/E/F (shares=1024) The same benchmark is running in group C & F, no other tasks are running, the benchmark is capable to consumed all the CPUs. We suppose the group C will win more CPU resources since it could enjoy all the shares of group A, but it's F who wins much more. The reason is because we have group B with shares as 2, since A->cfs_rq.load.weight == B->se.load.weight == B->shares/nr_cpus, so A->cfs_rq.load.weight become very small. And in calc_group_shares() we calculate shares as: load = max(scale_load_down(cfs_rq->load.weight), cfs_rq->avg.load_avg); shares = (tg_shares * load) / tg_weight; Since the 'cfs_rq->load.weight' is too small, the load become 0 after scale down, although 'tg_shares' is 102400, shares of the se which stand for group A on root cfs_rq become 2. While the se of D on root cfs_rq is far more bigger than 2, so it wins the battle. Thus when scale_load_down() scale real weight down to 0, it's no longer telling the real story, the caller will have the wrong information and the calculation will be buggy. This patch add check in scale_load_down(), so the real weight will be >= MIN_SHARES after scale, after applied the group C wins as expected. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/38e8e212-59a1-64b2-b247-b6d0b52d8dc1@linux.alibaba.com
| * | psi: Move PF_MEMSTALL out of task->flagsYafang Shao2020-03-202-11/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The task->flags is a 32-bits flag, in which 31 bits have already been consumed. So it is hardly to introduce other new per process flag. Currently there're still enough spaces in the bit-field section of task_struct, so we can define the memstall state as a single bit in task_struct instead. This patch also removes an out-of-date comment pointed by Matthew. Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1584408485-1921-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com
| * | psi: Optimize switching tasks inside shared cgroupsJohannes Weiner2020-03-202-28/+68
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When switching tasks running on a CPU, the psi state of a cgroup containing both of these tasks does not change. Right now, we don't exploit that, and can perform many unnecessary state changes in nested hierarchies, especially when most activity comes from one leaf cgroup. This patch implements an optimization where we only update cgroups whose state actually changes during a task switch. These are all cgroups that contain one task but not the other, up to the first shared ancestor. When both tasks are in the same group, we don't need to update anything at all. We can identify the first shared ancestor by walking the groups of the incoming task until we see TSK_ONCPU set on the local CPU; that's the first group that also contains the outgoing task. The new psi_task_switch() is similar to psi_task_change(). To allow code reuse, move the task flag maintenance code into a new function and the poll/avg worker wakeups into the shared psi_group_change(). Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200316191333.115523-3-hannes@cmpxchg.org
| * | psi: Fix cpu.pressure for cpu.max and competing cgroupsJohannes Weiner2020-03-203-5/+37
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For simplicity, cpu pressure is defined as having more than one runnable task on a given CPU. This works on the system-level, but it has limitations in a cgrouped reality: When cpu.max is in use, it doesn't capture the time in which a task is not executing on the CPU due to throttling. Likewise, it doesn't capture the time in which a competing cgroup is occupying the CPU - meaning it only reflects cgroup-internal competitive pressure, not outside pressure. Enable tracking of currently executing tasks, and then change the definition of cpu pressure in a cgroup from NR_RUNNING > 1 to NR_RUNNING > ON_CPU which will capture the effects of cpu.max as well as competition from outside the cgroup. After this patch, a cgroup running `stress -c 1` with a cpu.max setting of 5000 10000 shows ~50% continuous CPU pressure. Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200316191333.115523-2-hannes@cmpxchg.org
| * | sched/core: Distribute tasks within affinity masksPaul Turner2020-03-201-1/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, when updating the affinity of tasks via either cpusets.cpus, or, sched_setaffinity(); tasks not currently running within the newly specified mask will be arbitrarily assigned to the first CPU within the mask. This (particularly in the case that we are restricting masks) can result in many tasks being assigned to the first CPUs of their new masks. This: 1) Can induce scheduling delays while the load-balancer has a chance to spread them between their new CPUs. 2) Can antogonize a poor load-balancer behavior where it has a difficult time recognizing that a cross-socket imbalance has been forced by an affinity mask. This change adds a new cpumask interface to allow iterated calls to distribute within the intersection of the provided masks. The cases that this mainly affects are: - modifying cpuset.cpus - when tasks join a cpuset - when modifying a task's affinity via sched_setaffinity(2) Signed-off-by: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> Signed-off-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> Tested-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200311010113.136465-1-joshdon@google.com
| * | sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warningVincent Guittot2020-03-201-4/+22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When a cfs rq is throttled, the latter and its child are removed from the leaf list but their nr_running is not changed which includes staying higher than 1. When a task is enqueued in this throttled branch, the cfs rqs must be added back in order to ensure correct ordering in the list but this can only happens if nr_running == 1. When cfs bandwidth is used, we call unconditionnaly list_add_leaf_cfs_rq() when enqueuing an entity to make sure that the complete branch will be added. Similarly unthrottle_cfs_rq() can stop adding cfs in the list when a parent is throttled. Iterate the remaining entity to ensure that the complete branch will be added in the list. Reported-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Tested-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v5.1+ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200306135257.25044-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
| * | thermal/cpu-cooling, sched/core: Move the arch_set_thermal_pressure() API to ↵Ingo Molnar2020-03-061-0/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | generic scheduler code drivers/base/arch_topology.c is only built if CONFIG_GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY=y, resulting in such build failures: cpufreq_cooling.c:(.text+0x1e7): undefined reference to `arch_set_thermal_pressure' Move it to sched/core.c instead, and keep it enabled on x86 despite us not having a arch_scale_thermal_pressure() facility there, to build-test this thing. Cc: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
| * | sched/rt: Remove unnecessary push for unfit tasksQais Yousef2020-03-061-5/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In task_woken_rt() and switched_to_rto() we try trigger push-pull if the task is unfit. But the logic is found lacking because if the task was the only one running on the CPU, then rt_rq is not in overloaded state and won't trigger a push. The necessity of this logic was under a debate as well, a summary of the discussion can be found in the following thread: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200226160247.iqvdakiqbakk2llz@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com/ Remove the logic for now until a better approach is agreed upon. Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Fixes: 804d402fb6f6 ("sched/rt: Make RT capacity-aware") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200302132721.8353-6-qais.yousef@arm.com
| * | sched/rt: Allow pulling unfitting taskQais Yousef2020-03-061-2/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When implemented RT Capacity Awareness; the logic was done such that if a task was running on a fitting CPU, then it was sticky and we would try our best to keep it there. But as Steve suggested, to adhere to the strict priority rules of RT class; allow pulling an RT task to unfitting CPU to ensure it gets a chance to run ASAP. LINK: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200203111451.0d1da58f@oasis.local.home/ Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Fixes: 804d402fb6f6 ("sched/rt: Make RT capacity-aware") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200302132721.8353-5-qais.yousef@arm.com
| * | sched/rt: Optimize cpupri_find() on non-heterogenous systemsQais Yousef2020-03-063-8/+31
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | By introducing a new cpupri_find_fitness() function that takes the fitness_fn as an argument and only called when asym_system static key is enabled. cpupri_find() is now a wrapper function that calls cpupri_find_fitness() passing NULL as a fitness_fn, hence disabling the logic that handles fitness by default. LINK: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c0772fca-0a4b-c88d-fdf2-5715fcf8447b@arm.com/ Reported-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Fixes: 804d402fb6f6 ("sched/rt: Make RT capacity-aware") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200302132721.8353-4-qais.yousef@arm.com
| * | sched/rt: Re-instate old behavior in select_task_rq_rt()Qais Yousef2020-03-061-0/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When RT Capacity Aware support was added, the logic in select_task_rq_rt was modified to force a search for a fitting CPU if the task currently doesn't run on one. But if the search failed, and the search was only triggered to fulfill the fitness request; we could end up selecting a new CPU unnecessarily. Fix this and re-instate the original behavior by ensuring we bail out in that case. This behavior change only affected asymmetric systems that are using util_clamp to implement capacity aware. None asymmetric systems weren't affected. LINK: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200218041620.GD28029@codeaurora.org/ Reported-by: Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Fixes: 804d402fb6f6 ("sched/rt: Make RT capacity-aware") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200302132721.8353-3-qais.yousef@arm.com
| * | sched/rt: cpupri_find: Implement fallback mechanism for !fit caseQais Yousef2020-03-061-56/+101
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When searching for the best lowest_mask with a fitness_fn passed, make sure we record the lowest_level that returns a valid lowest_mask so that we can use that as a fallback in case we fail to find a fitting CPU at all levels. The intention in the original patch was not to allow a down migration to unfitting CPU. But this missed the case where we are already running on unfitting one. With this change now RT tasks can still move between unfitting CPUs when they're already running on such CPU. And as Steve suggested; to adhere to the strict priority rules of RT, if a task is already running on a fitting CPU but due to priority it can't run on it, allow it to downmigrate to unfitting CPU so it can run. Reported-by: Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Fixes: 804d402fb6f6 ("sched/rt: Make RT capacity-aware") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200302132721.8353-2-qais.yousef@arm.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200203142712.a7yvlyo2y3le5cpn@e107158-lin/
| * | sched/fair: Fix reordering of enqueue/dequeue_task_fair()Vincent Guittot2020-03-061-8/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Even when a cgroup is throttled, the group se of a child cgroup can still be enqueued and its gse->on_rq stays true. When a task is enqueued on such child, we still have to update the load_avg and increase h_nr_running of the throttled cfs. Nevertheless, the 1st for_each_sched_entity() loop is skipped because of gse->on_rq == true and the 2nd loop because the cfs is throttled whereas we have to update both load_avg with the old h_nr_running and increase h_nr_running in such case. The same sequence can happen during dequeue when se moves to parent before breaking in the 1st loop. Note that the update of load_avg will effectively happen only once in order to sync up to the throttled time. Next call for updating load_avg will stop early because the clock stays unchanged. Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Fixes: 6d4d22468dae ("sched/fair: Reorder enqueue/dequeue_task_fair path") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200306084208.12583-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
| * | sched/fair: Fix runnable_avg for throttled cfsVincent Guittot2020-03-061-2/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When a cfs_rq is throttled, its group entity is dequeued and its running tasks are removed. We must update runnable_avg with the old h_nr_running and update group_se->runnable_weight with the new h_nr_running at each level of the hierarchy. Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Fixes: 9f68395333ad ("sched/pelt: Add a new runnable average signal") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200227154115.8332-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
| * | sched/deadline: Make two functions staticYu Chen2020-03-062-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Since commit 06a76fe08d4 ("sched/deadline: Move DL related code from sched/core.c to sched/deadline.c"), DL related code moved to deadline.c. Make the following two functions static since they're only used in deadline.c: dl_change_utilization() init_dl_rq_bw_ratio() Signed-off-by: Yu Chen <chen.yu@easystack.cn> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200228100329.16927-1-chen.yu@easystack.cn
| * | sched/topology: Don't enable EAS on SMT systemsValentin Schneider2020-03-061-2/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | EAS already requires asymmetric CPU capacities to be enabled, and mixing this with SMT is an aberration, but better be safe than sorry. Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Acked-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200227191433.31994-2-valentin.schneider@arm.com
| * | sched/numa: Acquire RCU lock for checking idle cores during NUMA balancingMel Gorman2020-03-061-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Qian Cai reported the following bug: The linux-next commit ff7db0bf24db ("sched/numa: Prefer using an idle CPU as a migration target instead of comparing tasks") introduced a boot warning, [ 86.520534][ T1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 86.520540][ T1] 5.6.0-rc3-next-20200227 #7 Not tainted [ 86.520545][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 86.520551][ T1] kernel/sched/fair.c:5914 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! [ 86.520555][ T1] [ 86.520555][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 86.520555][ T1] [ 86.520561][ T1] [ 86.520561][ T1] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 86.520567][ T1] 1 lock held by systemd/1: [ 86.520571][ T1] #0: ffff8887f4b14848 (&mm->mmap_sem#2){++++}, at: do_page_fault+0x1d2/0x998 [ 86.520594][ T1] [ 86.520594][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 86.520602][ T1] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Not tainted 5.6.0-rc3-next-20200227 #7 task_numa_migrate() checks for idle cores when updating NUMA-related statistics. This relies on reading a RCU-protected structure in test_idle_cores() via this call chain task_numa_migrate -> update_numa_stats -> numa_idle_core -> test_idle_cores While the locking could be fine-grained, it is more appropriate to acquire the RCU lock for the entire scan of the domain. This patch removes the warning triggered at boot time. Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Fixes: ff7db0bf24db ("sched/numa: Prefer using an idle CPU as a migration target instead of comparing tasks") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200227191804.GJ3818@techsingularity.net
| * | sched/fair: Fix kernel build warning in test_idle_cores() for !SMT NUMAValentin Schneider2020-03-061-5/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Building against the tip/sched/core as ff7db0bf24db ("sched/numa: Prefer using an idle CPU as a migration target instead of comparing tasks") with the arm64 defconfig (which doesn't have CONFIG_SCHED_SMT set) leads to: kernel/sched/fair.c:1525:20: warning: 'test_idle_cores' declared 'static' but never defined [-Wunused-function] static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu, bool def); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Rather than define it in its own CONFIG_SCHED_SMT #define island, bunch it up with test_idle_cores(). Reported-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> [mgorman@techsingularity.net: Edit changelog, minor style change] Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Fixes: ff7db0bf24db ("sched/numa: Prefer using an idle CPU as a migration target instead of comparing tasks") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200303110258.1092-3-mgorman@techsingularity.net
| * | sched/fair: Enable tuning of decay periodThara Gopinath2020-03-063-2/+33
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Thermal pressure follows pelt signals which means the decay period for thermal pressure is the default pelt decay period. Depending on SoC characteristics and thermal activity, it might be beneficial to decay thermal pressure slower, but still in-tune with the pelt signals. One way to achieve this is to provide a command line parameter to set a decay shift parameter to an integer between 0 and 10. Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200222005213.3873-10-thara.gopinath@linaro.org
| * | sched/fair: Update cpu_capacity to reflect thermal pressureThara Gopinath2020-03-061-0/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | cpu_capacity initially reflects the maximum possible capacity of a CPU. Thermal pressure on a CPU means this maximum possible capacity is unavailable due to thermal events. This patch subtracts the average thermal pressure for a CPU from its maximum possible capacity so that cpu_capacity reflects the remaining maximum capacity. Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200222005213.3873-8-thara.gopinath@linaro.org
| * | sched/fair: Enable periodic update of average thermal pressureThara Gopinath2020-03-062-0/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Introduce support in scheduler periodic tick and other CFS bookkeeping APIs to trigger the process of computing average thermal pressure for a CPU. Also consider avg_thermal.load_avg in others_have_blocked which allows for decay of pelt signals. Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200222005213.3873-7-thara.gopinath@linaro.org
| * | sched/pelt: Add support to track thermal pressureThara Gopinath2020-03-063-0/+65
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Extrapolating on the existing framework to track rt/dl utilization using pelt signals, add a similar mechanism to track thermal pressure. The difference here from rt/dl utilization tracking is that, instead of tracking time spent by a CPU running a RT/DL task through util_avg, the average thermal pressure is tracked through load_avg. This is because thermal pressure signal is weighted time "delta" capacity unlike util_avg which is binary. "delta capacity" here means delta between the actual capacity of a CPU and the decreased capacity a CPU due to a thermal event. In order to track average thermal pressure, a new sched_avg variable avg_thermal is introduced. Function update_thermal_load_avg can be called to do the periodic bookkeeping (accumulate, decay and average) of the thermal pressure. Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200222005213.3873-2-thara.gopinath@linaro.org
| * | sched/vtime: Prevent unstable evaluation of WARN(vtime->state)Chris Wilson2020-03-061-19/+22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | As the vtime is sampled under loose seqcount protection by kcpustat, the vtime fields may change as the code flows. Where logic dictates a field has a static value, use a READ_ONCE. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Fixes: 74722bb223d0 ("sched/vtime: Bring up complete kcpustat accessor") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200123180849.28486-1-frederic@kernel.org
| * | Merge branch 'linus' into sched/core, to pick up fixesIngo Molnar2020-03-061-0/+2
| |\| | | | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
| * | sched/numa: Stop an exhastive search if a reasonable swap candidate or idle ↵Mel Gorman2020-02-241-4/+27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CPU is found When domains are imbalanced or overloaded a search of all CPUs on the target domain is searched and compared with task_numa_compare. In some circumstances, a candidate is found that is an obvious win. o A task can move to an idle CPU and an idle CPU is found o A swap candidate is found that would move to its preferred domain This patch terminates the search when either condition is met. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Cc: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200224095223.13361-14-mgorman@techsingularity.net
| * | sched/numa: Bias swapping tasks based on their preferred nodeMel Gorman2020-02-241-6/+37
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When swapping tasks for NUMA balancing, it is preferred that tasks move to or remain on their preferred node. When considering an imbalance, encourage tasks to move to their preferred node and discourage tasks from moving away from their preferred node. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Cc: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200224095223.13361-13-mgorman@techsingularity.net
| * | sched/numa: Find an alternative idle CPU if the CPU is part of an active ↵Mel Gorman2020-02-241-18/+22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | NUMA balance Multiple tasks can attempt to select and idle CPU but fail because numa_migrate_on is already set and the migration fails. Instead of failing, scan for an alternative idle CPU. select_idle_sibling is not used because it requires IRQs to be disabled and it ignores numa_migrate_on allowing multiple tasks to stack. This scan may still fail if there are idle candidate CPUs due to races but if this occurs, it's best that a task stay on an available CPU that move to a contended one. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Cc: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200224095223.13361-12-mgorman@techsingularity.net
| * | sched/numa: Prefer using an idle CPU as a migration target instead of ↵Mel Gorman2020-02-241-17/+102
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | comparing tasks task_numa_find_cpu() can scan a node multiple times. Minimally it scans to gather statistics and later to find a suitable target. In some cases, the second scan will simply pick an idle CPU if the load is not imbalanced. This patch caches information on an idle core while gathering statistics and uses it immediately if load is not imbalanced to avoid a second scan of the node runqueues. Preference is given to an idle core rather than an idle SMT sibling to avoid packing HT siblings due to linearly scanning the node cpumask. As a side-effect, even when the second scan is necessary, the importance of using select_idle_sibling is much reduced because information on idle CPUs is cached and can be reused. Note that this patch actually makes is harder to move to an idle CPU as multiple tasks can race for the same idle CPU due to a race checking numa_migrate_on. This is addressed in the next patch. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Cc: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200224095223.13361-11-mgorman@techsingularity.net
| * | sched/fair: Take into account runnable_avg to classify groupVincent Guittot2020-02-241-1/+30
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Take into account the new runnable_avg signal to classify a group and to mitigate the volatility of util_avg in face of intensive migration or new task with random utilization. Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: "Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>" Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Cc: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200224095223.13361-10-mgorman@techsingularity.net