| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Get rid of this warning:
drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/cq.c: In function ‘rvt_cq_exit’:
drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/cq.c:542:2: warning: ‘worker’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
kthread_destroy_worker(worker);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
by fixing the function to actually work.
Fixes: 6efaf10f163d ("IB/rdmavt: Avoid queuing work into a destroyed cq kthread worker")
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Update the MAINTAINERS file for AFS and AF_RXRPC to include a website
pointer.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
[ This resurrects commit 53855d10f456, which was reverted in
2b41226b39b6. It depended on commit d544abd5ff7d ("lib/radix-tree:
Convert to hotplug state machine") so now it is correct to apply ]
Patch "lib/radix-tree: Convert to hotplug state machine" breaks the test
suite as it adds a call to cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls() which is not
currently emulated in the test suite. Add it, and delete the emulation
of the old CPU hotplug mechanism.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1480369871-5271-36-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.com
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
If CONFIG_PRINTK=n:
kernel/printk/printk.c:1893: warning: ‘cont’ defined but not used
Note that there are actually two different struct cont definitions and
objects: the first one is used if CONFIG_PRINTK=y, the second one became
unused by removing console_cont_flush().
Fixes: 5c2992ee7fd8 ("printk: remove console flushing special cases for partial buffered lines")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Acked-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
[ I do the occasional "allnoconfig" builds, but apparently not often
enough - Linus ]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
It actively hurts proper merging, and makes for a lot of special cases.
There was a good(ish) reason for doing it originally, but it's getting
too painful to maintain. And most of the original reasons for it are
long gone.
So instead of having special code to flush partial lines to the console
(as opposed to the record buffers), do _all_ the console writing from
the record buffer, and be done with it.
If an oops happens (or some other synchronous event), we will flush the
partial lines due to the oops printing activity, so this does not affect
that. It does mean that if you have a completely hung machine, a
partial preceding line may not have been printed out.
That was some of the original reason for this complexity, in fact, back
when we used to test for the historical i386 "halt" instruction problem
by doing
pr_info("Checking 'hlt' instruction... ");
if (!boot_cpu_data.hlt_works_ok) {
pr_cont("disabled\n");
return;
}
halt();
halt();
halt();
halt();
pr_cont("OK\n");
and that model no longer works (it the 'hlt' instruction kills the
machine, the partial line won't have been flushed, so you won't even see
it).
Of course, that was also back in the days when people actually had
textual console output rather than a graphical splash-screen at bootup.
How times change..
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Tested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
The record logging code looks at the previous record flags in various
ways, and they are all wrong.
You can't use the previous record flags to determine anything about the
next record, because they may simply not be related. In particular, the
reason the previous record was a continuation record may well be exactly
_because_ the new record was printed by a different process, which is
why the previous record was flushed.
So all those games are simply wrong, and make the code hard to
understand (because the code fundamentally cdoes not make sense).
So remove it.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|